Author: ldrewes

No Longer Stuck in the Middle?

By now, readers likely know that large-cap equities propelled the U.S. equity market higher in 2023 and 2024, as the S&P 500 Index advanced over 20% in each of those years. Although positive performance continued for U.S. stocks to begin 2025, the often-overlooked mid-cap space ultimately led the way, with the Russell Midcap Index gaining 4.3% in January. This figure was higher than both the 3.2% and 2.6% returns notched by the Russell 1000 Index and Russell 2000 Index, respectively, during the month. Commonly underrepresented in investor portfolios, mid-cap indices provide exposure to more established business models than small-cap benchmarks but also offer potential exposure to companies growing at a faster rate than those within the large-cap universe.

As it relates to recent performance drivers, mid-cap equities were buoyed by the January CPI print, which led to a broadening out of markets. The space also benefited on a relative basis as mega-cap technology stalwarts sold off due to rhetoric surrounding trade restrictions and AI competition from China. While market concentration issues related to these mega-cap companies are a belabored topic, the theme of concentration is not isolated to the large-cap space. To that point, just two companies in the Russell Midcap Growth Index (Palantir and AppLovin) accounted for nearly 30% of the return of that benchmark last year. As of the end of last month, these two companies comprise more than 8% of the index and, with market capitalizations above $100 billion, are now outside of the typical range used to delineate the mid-cap space. Since these and similar dynamics have plagued indices across the equity spectrum, Russell will implement a second rebalance in November based on market capitalization beginning next year. This rebalance will help ensure the Russell indices provide an accurate representation of their respective asset classes and have the potential to combat historic levels of concentration. As index construction evolves, it is prudent for investors to construct diversified equity portfolios to balance the risks and rewards of each asset class.

Mexico Winning the Battle with Inflation

Like many countries in recent years, Mexico has grappled with higher-than-average inflation levels, primarily driven by elevated food and producer prices. Mexico notably began tackling its inflation problem earlier than most developed countries in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. To that point, Banxico, the central bank of Mexico, started to raise its key rate in June of 2021, roughly 9 months before the U.S. Federal Reserve began its hiking cycle. This key rate reached a peak of more than 11% in early 2023 shortly after Mexican inflation, as measured by headline CPI, achieved a record high of 8.7% on a year-over-year basis. After leaving its key rate unchanged for nearly a year, Banxico finally started to loosen its policy earlier this year given a moderation in both core and headline CPI. Indeed, the most recent reading of core CPI, which came in at a multi-year low of 3.9%, likely allows Mexican policymakers to feel confident that their battle with inflation may be coming to an end. Going forward, lower inflation could portend additional rate cuts by Banxico. This dynamic, in tandem with nearshoring trends that have led to an increase in Mexican manufacturing activity and exports, could be conducive to strong performance for equities in the region.

The Elusive Small-Cap Revival

U.S. small-cap equities have trailed their larger peers for over 13 years. Although the asset class has shown intermittent signs of strength throughout that period, including at the end of 2023 and in July of this year, a lasting shift in leadership continues to be elusive. When assessing the prospects of small-cap equities going forward, it may be helpful to analyze the high yield bond market, as the behavior of high yield spreads can serve as an indicator of small-cap strength. The primary reason for this relationship is likely that tighter spreads indicate economic strength and lower recession risk, and performance of small-cap stocks is closely tied to the health of the economy. To that point, over the last two decades when high yield spreads retreated below key levels outlined in this week’s chart, small-cap equities have tended to perform well. A recent example of this phenomenon came in late 2020, when spreads fell sharply, and the Russell 2000 Index advanced by over 22%. Spreads fell again in November of last year and remain tight to this day, and the Russell 2000 Index has advanced by roughly 36% over this period.

Although large-cap stocks continue to propel markets into the fourth quarter, there are several potential catalysts for small-cap equities that could be unlocked in the near future. First, forward valuations (e.g., price-to-earnings ratios) for small caps relative to large caps sit near historic lows. Additionally, investors may see a shift in Federal Reserve policy as a trigger for a market regime change, as small-cap equities are more negatively impacted by higher interest rates given the larger debt burdens these companies typically carry. Put simply, lower interest rates have historically been a tailwind for small-cap stock performance. Perhaps most importantly, the fundamental backdrop for small caps shows signs of improvement. Specifically, easing pressures from interest expenses and a reacceleration of sales may support earnings growth, which has fallen short of lofty expectations from the beginning of the year. Finally, the benefits of reshoring and recent government spending that will likely accrue to smaller companies have yet to be fully realized.

Despite these potential catalysts, a revival within the small-cap space remains elusive, at least for now. While a softer inflation reading in July spurred a brief rally in small-cap equities, the Russell 2000 Index has retreated by roughly 50 basis points since the Fed cut its policy rate. This figure is well below the 2.4% return notched by the S&P 500 Index since that time. Indeed, large-cap stocks may currently be perceived as a safe haven amid higher levels of market volatility, economic risk, geopolitical conflicts, and consumer weakness. Still, Marquette believes a dedicated allocation to small-cap stocks will ultimately prove beneficial to investors in the future given the diversification benefits offered by the space and the potential catalysts for stronger performance outlined above.

Lower Rates, Better Fates?

With the first Federal Reserve rate cut of the current loosening cycle in the rear-view mirror, investors are now questioning how markets will react to a new era of macroeconomic policy. While each rate cycle is unique, examining how the S&P 500 and Bloomberg Aggregate indices have responded to prior instances of rate cuts can give investors some insight on what to expect going forward. To that point, this week’s chart highlights the returns of these benchmarks following the first cut of last six periods of easing by the Federal Reserve. Although rate cuts have historically portended higher near-term equity returns, there have been two instances of negative S&P 500 Index performance in the wake of Fed easing. Specifically, the 1- and 3-year returns following rate cuts in 2001 (the Dot Com Bubble) and 2007 (the Global Financial Crisis) were both negative. That said, performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index was positive during both of those periods, as well as during the other four easing cycles shown in this week’s chart. Even during the 3-year period following July of 2019, which included six months of rate hikes in 2022, the fixed income benchmark returned 0.4% on an annualized basis. In summary, although Fed rate cuts have historically coincided with recessions in the U.S., investors can gain comfort from that fact that both equities and bonds have fared relatively well amid periods of monetary policy loosening.

A Cross Pacific Current

The pullback in global equity indices at the beginning of August left many investors racing to understand what had caused such outsized volatility. Amid this market turbulence, there were two seemingly unrelated economic events that occurred on different sides of the globe. On July 31, the Bank of Japan surprisingly announced that it would raise its benchmark interest rate from 0.10% to 0.25%, continuing its transition from the ultra-low rates that had been commonplace in recent time. Later that week, the July U.S. nonfarm payroll employment data, which many use to gauge the health of the domestic labor market, came in below estimates. This report led investors to question the strength of the U.S. economy and whether the Federal Reserve had waited too long to cut its policy rate. Simply put, equity markets reacted negatively. The Nasdaq, which is a growth-oriented U.S. large-cap stock index, exhibited a particularly sharp drop during this time, falling by roughly 7% in less than one week. The speed and severity of this sell-off left many asking if one poor labor report alone was solely to blame. As it turned out, the Bank of Japan’s interest rate decision earlier in the week may have been just as important as it relates to what had occurred in U.S. markets.

A “carry trade” is a strategy wherein an investor borrows in a low-yielding currency (in this case the Japanese yen) and invests the borrowed funds in a higher-yielding asset. While it is difficult to assess the size and scope of these trades, certain statistical relationships can emerge that may shine light on how borrowed funds are being invested. To that point, the chart above shows the year-to-date changes in level of the Nasdaq index and the value of the U.S. dollar (USD) relative to the Japanese yen (JPY). Interestingly, on a rolling 30-day basis since the start of the year, the movements of the NASDAQ and USD/JPY have been moderately correlated with a coefficient of 0.46 (a coefficient of 1 would indicate a perfectly positively correlated relationship). While indeed moderate, this relationship does indicate that as the dollar has weakened relative to the yen, the Nasdaq has weakened in a similar fashion. What might be driving this relationship?

While we cannot draw definitive conclusions based on correlation alone, the carry trade strategy may be partially responsible for the emergence of this relationship. In the first half of this year, U.S. large-cap stocks notched strong performance while the dollar steadily strengthened against the yen, which kept yen borrowing costs low. That said, when the Bank of Japan raised its policy rate (and the cost of borrowing yen) in late July, many carry trade investors were forced to sell assets to pay back the funds borrowed in yen, which was now rapidly appreciating against the dollar.  For those who had been investing borrowed funds in U.S. stocks, harvesting gains from these positions would be a logical move in order to post collateral. It is important to point out, however, that this process can snowball. Specifically, higher demand for yen drives up the value of the currency, which prompts collateral calls for more investors who have borrowed in yen, which leads to further selling of risk assets like U.S. stocks. This feedback loop can be observed in the shaded region of this week’s chart, during which the correlation coefficient between Nasdaq and USD/JPY jumped to more than 0.9.

While this chart highlights one relationship to provide insight into the recent spike in equity volatility, a broader conclusion readers should draw is that changing dynamics within global markets and the opaque nature of certain trades can make risks faced by investors difficult to identify and measure. As a result, it is important for investors to maintain well-diversified portfolios that can weather various market environments.