Bank Failures: Past and Present

March 15, 2023 | Eddie Arrieta, Associate Research Analyst

This chart description is for illustrative purposes only and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Please see full disclosures at end of PDF document in the web post. General description: Three-line chart showing bank failures and associated assets and deposits since 2001. Chart subtitle: While bank failures have been rare since the Global Financial Crisis, 2023 has already seen the shuttering of two large entities. Chart source: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, data as of March 15, 2023. Chart visual description: Left y-axis is labeled “($M)” and ranges from $0 to $400,000. X-axis in annual increments, from 2001 to 2023. Right y-axis is labeled “Bank Failures” and ranges from 0 to 180. Orange line plots Total Assets (L), dark orange line plots Total Deposits (L), and blue line plots Number of Bank Failures (R). Chart data description: Minimal data for all three lines up to 2008. Total Assets and Deposits lines peaked in 2008 at $373B and $234B, respectively, and decreased to near zero by 2012. Bank Failures line peaked in 2010 at 157, but in 2008 there were 25, 2009 there were 140, and after peaking took until 2015 to return to single digits. 2021 and 2022 had zero failures, and 2023 is currently at 2 failures with $319B in assets and $264 in deposits. End chart description. See disclosures at end of document.

Recent developments within the banking industry have revived difficult memories of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). As many will recall, hundreds of financial institutions failed during that period, including Washington Mutual (WaMu), a savings and loan organization with approximately $307 billion in assets at the time of its collapse. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) ultimately sold the banking subsidiaries of WaMu to JP Morgan for $1.9 billion, marking the largest U.S. bank failure in history. In total, 25 banks with combined assets of more than $373 billion closed their doors in 2008, with additional failures in 2009 (140 banks) and 2010 (157 banks). In response to the widespread impact of the GFC, the federal government enacted many new laws and regulations pertaining to the financial sector, which resulted in greater industry oversight and more robust stress tests of bank operations. While additional failures have occurred since the GFC, most banks have been healthy and resilient in the last decade, including during the COVID-19 pandemic. All told, a total of just eight banks with a combined $678 million in assets failed from 2018–2022.

Needless to say, dynamics within the domestic banking industry have shifted in the last several days. After a run on its deposits, Silicon Valley Bank, which had once been the 16th largest bank in the United States, failed and was placed into receivership of the FDIC on March 10. Silicon Valley Bank is now the second-largest bank to fail in American history, with approximately $209 billion in total assets and $175 billion in deposits at the time of its collapse. Signature Bank was the next domino to fall over the weekend, again due in part to a run on its deposits, and now stands as the third-largest U.S. bank failure ever ($110 billion in assets and $88.6 billion in deposits). While these two cases represent the only bank failures thus far in 2023, many regional banks have seen their share prices drop significantly amid fears of contagion.

It is important to remember that while GFC-inspired regulations were designed specifically to mitigate the fallout from these types of events, the situation related to recent bank failures is fluid and could have ongoing impacts on global markets and central bank interest rate policy. Marquette will continue to monitor dynamics within the banking industry and provide updates and counsel to clients accordingly.

Print PDF > Bank Failures: Past and Present

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Eddie Arrieta
Associate Research Analyst

Get to Know Eddie

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Stacked column chart showing income return and capital return for various infrastructure sectors. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.29.2026

Balancing Growth and Income in Infrastructure

This week’s chart highlights the varying return profiles across key infrastructure sectors by illustrating the split between income and capital…

06.25.2026

Commodities: An Overview of the Asset Class

Commodities represent a unique asset class within global financial markets. Like equities and bonds, commodity prices are influenced by the…

Two-line chart showing median and average time in years for global unicorns to exit, 2016 to 2025. The 2025 data point (9.2 years median, 9.7 years average) is the highest point charted. In 2016, the median was 6.1 years and average was 6.0. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.22.2026

The VC Convergence Era

When Benchmark, one of Silicon Valley’s most renowned early-stage venture capital firms, closed $2 billion across two new funds this…

Two-line chart showing Private Construction Spending for Data Centers and Public Construction Spending for Transportation from December 2013 to present in billions of dollars. Data Centers in 2013 were $1.6 billion and Transportation was $28.7 billion. Since 2022, Data Center spending has increased quickly; Transportation has increased overall but relatively steadily. April 30, 2026 data point for Data Centers was 50.7, while Transportation was 49.9. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.15.2026

Centers of Attention

The rapid buildout of artificial intelligence infrastructure is reshaping the U.S. investment landscape. According to recent Census Bureau data, spending…

Line chart comparing Growth of $100 and Average Sharpe Ratio for MVIS BDC Index, Cliffwater Direct Lending Index as averages. Data goes back January 2010 through March 31, 2026. Average Sharpe for MVIS US BDC 0.4, Direct Lending 3.28, Bank Loan 0.79. Current datapoint for BDC is $425 and $479 for Direct Lending. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.08.2026

How to Launder Your Volatility

Hi, James Torgerson here! Volatility can be an unsightly blemish on portfolios and lead to inferior risk-adjusted returns. Private credit…

Column chart showing weight in MSCI Emerging Market Index for Taiwan, South Korea, and China annually since 2006. Taiwan hovered around 11% up to 2021, and has increased since then, with 2026 YTD at 26.5%. South Korea has followed a similar path, averaging about 14% 2006 to 2023; 2024 dropped to 9%, but 2025 was back up to 13.3%, and its weight has jumped to 23.1% YTD. China generally increased up to 2020, peaking at 29.7% of the index, but has since mostly decreased year to year, with 2026 YTD at 19.7%. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.01.2026

The New Face of Emerging Markets

The MSCI Emerging Markets Index has undergone a significant structural transformation in recent years. For much of the past decade,…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >