Coastal COVID: Diverging State Responses

July 15, 2020

Nearly a month into summer, the tragedy of COVID-19 rages on globally and in the U.S. As of July 13th, America’s death toll sat at over 135,000 with total cases approaching 3.4 million. The good news is that a number of virus hot spots have largely been tamed, most notably New York. To maintain this progress, Governor Cuomo implemented a mandatory quarantine period for travelers arriving from a number of other states. Elected officials in other once hard-hit locations, including Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot, have followed suit. Yet, despite the progress in some parts of the country, others are going in the opposite direction.

Two of the most populous states, California and Florida, have made headlines recently for their surging cases but differing responses. As of July 13th, California had 336,508 positive COVID-19 cases. Accelerating this grim total was a notable increase in the infection rate during June, which has continued into July. In response, Governor Newsom announced renewed restrictions this past Monday, and although not as wide-ranging as the initial spring lockdown, they are effectively a statewide ban on indoor activity with 80% of California residents affected. Also newsworthy was the announcement by both the Los Angeles and San Diego school districts that the school year will begin fully online.

Facing just as significant a problem, Florida’s case count sat at 291,629 on July 13th. Despite the rising cases and recently deemed “epicenter”¹ of Miami, Florida’s Commissioner of the Department of Education issued an order on July 7th that all of the state’s schools open for full-time in-person learning next month. After another week of surging cases, support for this directive was offered by Senator Marco Rubio on Monday, noting that “additional measures” be taken in hot spot locations. And, in the Sunshine State, it’s not just schools that are heading towards a return to normalcy. Disney World opened its doors for the first time since March last weekend.

The divergence in responses between these two coastal states highlights the differences in opinion witnessed since the start of the pandemic and helps explain the inconsistent success rates across states in controlling the outbreak. Though progress has been notable in the U.S., this most recent pattern suggests that a more uniform approach to battling the pandemic could help reduce the spread of COVID-19. The coming months will be telling for financial markets: the longer that the pandemic surges, the more volatility and headwinds will dominate the headlines and investor returns. On the other hand, if a more uniform and consistent approach can be embraced, the curve is sure to be shortened and a return to normalcy should be expected sooner rather than later.

Print PDF > Coastal COVID: Diverging State Responses

¹Dr. Lillian Abbo, University of Miami, via NPR

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

05.07.2026

The Fed Tackles Succession Planning

The leadership structure of the Federal Reserve is intentionally designed to promote continuity, independence, and institutional stability across political cycles….

Stacked column chart showing Weight in S&P 500 Index in 1985, 1995, 2005, 2015, and 2025 for top 10 companies at that time, with companies stacked for each year by weight. From 1985-2015, top 10 weight ranged from 17.6% to 21.1%, but 2025's weight was 40.6%. Company makeup changes over time, with no companies from 1985/1995 categories in 2025. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

05.04.2026

This Too Shall Reconstitute

Rooted in medieval Persian Sufi thought, the adage “this too shall pass” speaks to the fleeting and impermanent nature of…

Three-line chart comparing cumulative returns for MSCI EM Latin America Index, MSCI EAFE Index, and S&P 500 Index, Jan 1, 2026 through April 24, 2026. Dashed line at February 28 demarcates U.S. strikes on Iran. While all three indices dipped after war began, Latin America Index was higher to begin with and remains high. Most recent data point (4/24) for Latin America is 20.36%, EAFE is 5.7%, and S&P 500 is 5.06%. For full dataset, please email marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.27.2026

Let’s Hear It for Latin America

Latin American equity markets have shown remarkable strength in 2026. After a strong start to the year, the MSCI Emerging…

04.23.2026

We’ve Seen This Before

Diversify. Rebalance. Stay invested. Every one of these letters has concluded with that same advice in some shape or form….

Two-line chart showing unemployment rate for All U.S. Workers and Recent College Graduates (Ages 22–27), 12/31/05 to 12/31/25. Up to 2020 period, Recent College Graduates generally had a lower unemployment rate than all U.S. workers category, but since then, the opposite has been true. Lines begin at ~3% to ~5% range in 2005, rose during Global Financial Crisis of '07-'09 to near 10% for All, ~7% for Grads, then both lines declined fairly steadily up to COVID. Peak for both series was 6/30/20, with All at 12.8% and Grads at 13.4%. Most recent data for 12/31/25 is ~4% for All and ~5.5% for Grads. For full dataset, please email marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.20.2026

The Sorrows of Young Workers

Entry-level jobs have traditionally served as the primary bridge between education and stable employment, offering young workers a foothold from…

Combination column and line chart showing Net Duties Received (columns, left-hand axis, ranging $0 to $35 billion) and Effective Tariff Rate (line, right-hand axis, ranging 0 to 12%) monthly, from April 2024 through February 2025. Up to March 2025, both data series held relatively steady, averaging around $7B for net duties received, and 2% for effective tariff rate, but both series have quadrupled since then. Most recent (Feb-26) is $26B and 8%. Please contact us for the full data set at marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.13.2026

Liberation Day: One Year Later

On April 2, 2025, President Donald Trump announced a sweeping set of tariffs on imports into the United States. Dubbed…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >