Emerging Markets Debt a Better Play than Developed Market Debt

August 28, 2014

Emerging markets debt (“EMD”) represents an outstanding asset class for investors to diversify away from U.S.-centric core bonds, which includes U.S. Treasury, U.S. investment grade corporate and U.S. mortgage-backed bonds, as well as U.S.-centric bank loans and high yield bonds. It gives investors a large and expanding investment opportunity set that has very low correlation with U.S. equities and U.S. bonds.

In addition to stronger yields, where EMD is currently between 6% to 10% versus developed market bond yields between 0% to 6%, emerging markets also exhibit much stronger fundamentals versus their developed markets counterparts. Case in point, GDP growth has been much stronger in the emerging world than the developed world, especially so in the last few years, and is expected to continue for some time. Moreover, demographics are much more favorable for the emerging world, where population growth, especially in the younger, working segment, is expected to outstrip the developed world for quite some time. Lastly, as shown above, emerging market countries have much stronger debt and deficit profiles than developed market countries.

The left axis shows the debt as a percentage of GDP. The greater a country’s debt, the further towards the bottom of the chart it will show. The top axis shows the country’s fiscal deficit as a percentage of its GDP. The greater a country’s fiscal deficit, the further to the right it will show.

Emerging market countries are clustered toward the top left, due to their lower debt-to-GDP ratios and lower fiscal deficits. Developed market countries are clustered towards the bottom right, due to their higher debt-to-GDP ratios and higher fiscal deficits. Greece and Japan are in especially dire straits, and are literally off the charts.

What this chart tells us is that, as a whole, EMD represents a relatively secure asset class as the countries in question have much less debt to service than their developed market counterparts. In addition, they have been more fiscally sound, with lower deficits than their developed market counterparts. All of this adds up to strong support for emerging market countries and corporations to pay both the interest and principal on their bonds. Couple this with their higher yields and low correlations to other asset classes, and it makes it a must-have for most institutional portfolios.

Investors can take advantage of this space through a dedicated emerging markets debt manager that provides a U.S. dollar-denominated “hard currency” sovereign EMD focus, a “local currency” sovereign EMD focus, a corporate EMD focus, or a blended strategy that invests in both hard and local currency EMD bonds as well as sovereign and corporate EMD bonds. Marquette recommends a blended EMD allocation for investors to take advantage of the broadest diversification.

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Column chart showing weight in MSCI Emerging Market Index for Taiwan, South Korea, and China annually since 2006. Taiwan hovered around 11% up to 2021, and has increased since then, with 2026 YTD at 26.5%. South Korea has followed a similar path, averaging about 14% 2006 to 2023; 2024 dropped to 9%, but 2025 was back up to 13.3%, and its weight has jumped to 23.1% YTD. China generally increased up to 2020, peaking at 29.7% of the index, but has since mostly decreased year to year, with 2026 YTD at 19.7%. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.01.2026

The New Face of Emerging Markets

The MSCI Emerging Markets Index has undergone a significant structural transformation in recent years. For much of the past decade,…

05.26.2026

The Best and Worst of Times

The classic novel A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens begins with the line “It was the best of…

Four-line chart showing weight in Bloomberg Aggregate U.S. Bond Index for Treasuries, Government-Related, Corporate, and Securitized sub-indices, 12/31/1999 through 3/31/2026. For date range shown, Treasuries started at 31.7% and end at 45.9%. Government-Related start at 11.4% and end at 4.3%. Corporates start at 20.9% and end at 23.9%. Securitized start at 36.0% and end at 25.9%. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

05.18.2026

The “Magnificent One”

Over the last few years, equity markets have been defined by a group of stocks often referred to as the…

Combination column and line chart showing increase in non-renewables and renewables in net installed capacity (GW) in columns and share of new electricity generating capacity by renewables (line) annually since 2005. Renewables ave seen a marked increase in recent years (183.95GW in 2019 to 691.94GW in 2025). Renewable Share was at 86% for 2025. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

05.11.2026

A Renewed Focus on Renewables

In addition to the humanitarian toll of the conflict in Iran, the world is currently confronting the impact that trade…

Stacked column chart showing Weight in S&P 500 Index in 1985, 1995, 2005, 2015, and 2025 for top 10 companies at that time, with companies stacked for each year by weight. From 1985-2015, top 10 weight ranged from 17.6% to 21.1%, but 2025's weight was 40.6%. Company makeup changes over time, with no companies from 1985/1995 categories in 2025. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

05.04.2026

This Too Shall Reconstitute

Rooted in medieval Persian Sufi thought, the adage “this too shall pass” speaks to the fleeting and impermanent nature of…

Three-line chart comparing cumulative returns for MSCI EM Latin America Index, MSCI EAFE Index, and S&P 500 Index, Jan 1, 2026 through April 24, 2026. Dashed line at February 28 demarcates U.S. strikes on Iran. While all three indices dipped after war began, Latin America Index was higher to begin with and remains high. Most recent data point (4/24) for Latin America is 20.36%, EAFE is 5.7%, and S&P 500 is 5.06%. For full dataset, please email marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.27.2026

Let’s Hear It for Latin America

Latin American equity markets have shown remarkable strength in 2026. After a strong start to the year, the MSCI Emerging…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >