The Fed’s Effective Proxy Battle

February 16, 2023 | James Torgerson, Senior Research Analyst

Two-line chart comparing San Francisco Fed Funds Proxy Rate and Effective Fed Funds rate. Chart subtitle: The San Francisco Fed Funds Proxy Rate is materially higher than the effective fed funds rate, indicating broader financial market conditions are tighter than what is reflected by the fed funds rate alone. Chart visual description: Y-axis is labeled “Effective & Proxy Fed Funds Rate” and spans -2% to +8%. X-axis is labeled with Jan-“year” in one-year increments, from Jan-00 to Jan-23. Periods of hiking are shaded in grey. Periods of recession are shaded in light teal. The SF Proxy rate line is in dark blue and effective fed funds rate is in orange. Chart data description: At beginning of charted data, both lines peaked for period shown, with SF at 7.63% in May 2000 and effective fed funds at 6.54% in July 2000. From there, both lines fell in the wake of the Dot-Com Crash, then began to steadily climb in 2004 during a hiking period, peaking around 5% in 2H2006. Both fell sharply during the mid-2007’s Global Financial Crisis, held mostly flat at 0 (or below 0 for the SF rate), up to 2016, then steadily climbed toward 3% in 2019. From a few slight drops, both again fell in 2020’s COVID downturn, up to 2022 when hikes began again. As of January 2023, the SF Proxy Rate is at 6.1% while the effective fed funds rate is 4.3%. Chart source: Bloomberg, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, NBER as of January 31, 2023. End chart description. See disclosures at end of document.

The Federal Reserve’s sharp tightening of interest rates over the last year has made financial market conditions significantly more restrictive. However, financial conditions may be even tighter than generally recognized based on the fed funds rate alone. The San Francisco Federal Reserve Proxy Rate is a measure that uses public and private borrowing rates and spreads to better reflect broader monetary policy. The proxy rate represents the fed funds rate that would typically be associated with current market conditions, assuming financial markets are driven solely by this rate.

As of the end of January, the proxy rate was 6.1%, notably above the effective fed funds rate of 4.3%. The higher proxy rate indicates that broader monetary policy is tighter than what is implied by the fed funds rate alone. The proxy rate also started increasing in November 2021, while the Fed did not begin raising rates until March 2022, showing that broader financial market conditions have actually been tightening for more than a year. With markets extremely sensitive to Federal Reserve policy decisions, but the long-term health of the economy dependent on cooling price pressures, a higher proxy rate may be a hidden positive for markets.

Print PDF > The Fed’s Effective Proxy Battle

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

James Torgerson
Senior Research Analyst

Get to Know James

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Combination column and line chart showing Net Duties Received (columns, left-hand axis, ranging $0 to $35 billion) and Effective Tariff Rate (line, right-hand axis, ranging 0 to 12%) monthly, from April 2024 through February 2025. Up to March 2025, both data series held relatively steady, averaging around $7B for net duties received, and 2% for effective tariff rate, but both series have quadrupled since then. Most recent (Feb-26) is $26B and 8%. Please contact us for the full data set at marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.13.2026

Liberation Day: One Year Later

On April 2, 2025, President Donald Trump announced a sweeping set of tariffs on imports into the United States. Dubbed…

04.07.2026

Fiduciary Duties in Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives

On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor (DOL) issued its proposed regulation: Fiduciary Duties in Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives….

Line chart showing commercial & industrial loans as percent of total bank credit since 1980. Peak of line is September 1982 at 38%; since then there has been a steady decrease, with several peaks following global crises, with February 2026 datapoint at 21%. Basel I labeled at 1988, Basel II labeled at 2004, Basel III labeled at 2010. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.06.2026

Regulation Abdication?

The Basel capital framework was created to ensure that banks maintain sufficient capital to absorb losses and reduce the risk…

04.02.2026

1Q 2026 Market Insights Webinar

This video is a recording of a live webinar held April 16 by Marquette’s research team analyzing the first quarter…

Stacked column chart comparing contribution to total value creation broken out by revenue growth, margin expansion, and multiple expansion for private equity managers, by exit year, 2017 to 2024. 2017 column 45% revenue growth, 26% margin expansion, 29% multiple expansion. 2018 column 56% revenue growth, 4% margin expansion, 40% multiple expansion. 2019 column 43% revenue growth, 10% margin expansion, 47% multiple expansion. 2020 column 42% revenue growth, 19% margin expansion, 39% multiple expansion. 2021 column 46% revenue growth, 13% margin expansion, 42% multiple expansion. 2022 column 53% revenue growth, 20% margin expansion, 27% multiple expansion. 2023 column 64% revenue growth, 19% margin expansion, 17% multiple expansion. 2024 column 71% revenue growth, 12% margin expansion, 17% multiple expansion.

03.30.2026

Pulling the Right Value Creation Levers

In the period between 2009 and 2022, private equity managers thrived amid an environment of low interest rates and rising…

Line chart comparing Brent Crude Futures, WTI Futures, and European Gas Futures from December 2023 to present. Lefthand y-axis labeled Price per Barrel and ranges $0 to $120, corresponding to Brent Crude and WTI data series. Righthand y-axis labeled Price per megawatt Hour and ranges €0 to €70, corresponding to Euro-pean Gas Futures. All three series have spiked in recent weeks, with most recent data as of March 23, 2026 at 100.49 for Brent Crude, 88.72 for WTI, and 54.69 for European gas. Dashed line overlay at February 28 highlighting strikes on Iran.

03.23.2026

Pain at the Pump

Global energy costs have risen sharply this month due to a convergence of geopolitical shocks, as critical infrastructure and transport…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >