Has the Drop in Oil Prices Been a Drag on the U.S. Economy?

April 23, 2015 | Mike Spychalski, CAIA, Vice President

Over the past few quarters, there has been much discussion about how the recent plunge in oil prices would impact the U.S. economy. While there were expectations of both positive and negative effects associated with lower oil prices, the general consensus amongst economists was that this would have a net positive impact on the U.S. economy. Cuts in capital expenditures from U.S. oil producers (which have been a significant contributor to GDP growth for the past several years) were expected to be a drag on economic growth. At the same time, lower energy costs for consumers were expected to result in increased disposable income and thus increased consumer spending, which would boost economic growth. Given that the U.S. is a net importer of oil, the benefit to consumers was expected to more than offset the decrease in capital spending from producers, resulting in a net positive impact.

Since low oil prices have persisted for several months now, we are starting to get an indication of the impact on the economy, and at this point it does not appear to be nearly as positive as expected. It appears as if the economic drag from decreased capital expenditures from oil producers has been greater than the benefit from lower oil prices. While the drop in capital expenditures from oil producers has more or less been in line with expectations, the increase in disposable income has not translated to the increase in consumer spending that was anticipated. Consumers appear to be saving, rather than spending, this increased disposable income. As the chart illustrates, from June 2014, when oil peaked at approximately $115 per barrel, to February 2015 (the most recent date data is available for), annualized household spending on energy has decreased from approximately $645 billion to approximately $533 billion, representing a decrease of approximately $112 billion. Over the same time frame, annualized household saving has increased from approximately $658 billion to $768 billion, an increase of approximately $110 billion.

Thus far, the negative consequences from lower oil prices (reduced capital spending and job cuts from the energy sector) have been a drag on the U.S. economy, while the benefits from lower oil prices (increased consumer spending) have not yet had the positive impact that was expected. This phenomenon may help to explain some of the disappointing economic data observed during the first quarter. Consumers are often slow to adjust spending habits, and that may well be the case here, meaning that consumer spending will likely be one of the most influential economic data points in the coming months.

Mike Spychalski, CAIA
Vice President

Get to Know Mike

Related Content

This chart description is for illustrative purposes only and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Please see full disclosures at end of PDF document in the web post. General description: Table describing categories and criteria of MSCI indices. Chart subtitle: Despite its rapid ascendancy in recent decades, China is categorized as an emerging country by MSCI due to the market classification framework utilized by the index provider. Chart source: Source: MSCI as of June 30, 2023. ATVR: Annualized Traded Value Ratio, which is a liquidity measure used to assess liquidity of securities in the MSCI Global Investable Market Indices. The ATVR corresponds to the Annualized Traded Value of a security relative to its Free Float‐Adjusted Market Capitalization. Chart description: First column is Criteria, second is Frontier, third is Emerging, and fourth is Developed. First row section is Economic Development, detailed with “Sustainability of economic development.” Frontier: No requirement. Emerging: No requirement. Developed: Country GNI per capita 25% above the World Bank high income threshold for 3 consecutive years. Second section is Size and Liability Requirements, with four sub-rows. First: Number of companies meeting the following Standard Index criteria: Frontier: 2 Emerging: 3. Developed: 5. Second: Company size (full market cap, USD): Frontier: $1,033M. Emerging: $2,066M. Developed: $4,133M. Third: Security size (float market cap, USD): Frontier: $73M. Emerging: $1,033M. Developed: $2,066M. Fourth: Security liquidity: Frontier: 2.5% ATVR. Emerging: 15% ATVR. Developed: 20% ATVR. Third section is Market Accessibility, with five sub-rows. First: Openness to foreign ownership: Frontier: At least some. Emerging: Significant. Developed: Very high. Second: Ease of capital inflows / outflows: Frontier: At least partial. Emerging: Significant. Developed: Very high. Third: Efficiency of operational framework: Frontier: Modest. Emerging: Good and tested. Developed: Very high. Fourth: Availability of investment instruments: Frontier: High. Emerging: High. Developed: Unrestricted. Fifth: Stability of the institutional framework: Frontier: Modest. Emerging: Modest. Developed: Very high. End chart description. See disclosures at end of document.

12.04.2023

Is China Guilty of Category Fraud?

With movie awards season around the corner, some entertainment pundits may use the term “category fraud” to describe races in…

This chart description is for illustrative purposes only and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Please see full disclosures at end of PDF document in the web post. General description: Combination column and line chart comparing recent holiday spending by U.S. consumers. Chart subtitle: Spending is on track to reach record levels this holiday season, despite mounting economic pressures faced by American consumers. Chart source: Adobe Analytics and CNN Business as of October 31, 2023. Chart description: Left Y-axis is labeled “Spending” and ranges from $0B to $250B. Right Y-axis is labeled “YoY Growth” and ranges from 0% to 50%. X-axis labels each column: 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 (Projected). Holiday Spending by U.S. Consumers is plotted in dark teal columns. Holiday Spending Growth is plotted with light purple line and markers. 2019 saw $143B in spending and 13.1% YoY growth; 2020 $188B, 32.1%; 2021 $205B, 8.7%; 2022 $212B, 3.5%, and 2023 is projected at $222B and 4.8%. End chart description. See disclosures at end of document.

11.30.2023

‘Tis the Season to Spend!

The holiday spending frenzy is well underway as some of the biggest shopping days of the year, including Black Friday…

11.16.2023

The Taming of the VIX

October proved tumultuous for investors as all major U.S. equity indices were negative and the CBOE VIX Index, which serves…

This chart description is for illustrative purposes only and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Please see full disclosures at end of PDF document in the web post. General description: Combination stacked column and line chart comparing unrealized gains/losses with effective federal funds rate. Chart subtitle: Unrealized losses across depository institutions have increased in recent quarters thanks to higher interest rates. Chart source: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis as of June 30, 2023. Chart description: Left Y-axis is labeled “Unrealized Gains/Losses” and ranges from -$800B to +$800B, corresponding to stacked columns. Right Y-axis is labeled “Rate” and ranges from -6% to +6%, corresponding to line. X-axis ranges from 1Q08 to 2Q23; labels are at 3-quarter increments to fit so last label is for 1Q23. Available-For-Sale Securities are plotted in dark green base of stacked columns; Held-To-Maturity Securities are plotted in lighter green as second half of column. Effect Federal Funds Rate line is plotted in light blue. Unrealized losses are at significant levels for chart losses; since the fed funds rate has increased since 1Q22, losses have totaled over $300B. Most recent datapoints, as of 2Q23 are as follows: Available-For-Sale Securities at -$248.9B, Held-To-Maturity Securities at -$309.6B, and Effective Federal Funds Rate at 5.3%. Please contact us for the full dataset. End chart description. See disclosures at end of document.

11.08.2023

Realizing the Impact of Unrealized Losses

Earlier this year, the regional banking crisis and eventual collapses of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, First Republic Bank, and…

This chart description is for illustrative purposes only and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Please see full disclosures at end of PDF document in the web post. General description: Three-line chart showing cumulative return for various U.S. equity indices. Chart subtitle: Domestic stock indices enter correction territory after recent slide. Chart source: Bloomberg as of October 31, 2023. Chart description: Y-axis is labeled “Cumulative Return” and ranges from -15% to +10%. X-axis is labeled in monthly increments, from Jun-23 to Oct-23. Data ranges 6/30/23 through 10/31/23. S&P 500 Index is plotted in orange line, Nasdaq-100 Index in light tan line, and Russell 2000 Index in dark purple line. Most recent data points, respectively, -5.31%, -4.84%, -11.61%. Please contact us for the full dataset. End chart description. See disclosures at end of document.

11.01.2023

The Chart for Red October

U.S. equities declined for the third consecutive month in October amid an environment of higher yields and underwhelming earnings reports…

10.13.2023

3Q 2023 Market Insights Video

This video is a recording of a live webinar held on October 26 by Marquette’s research team, featuring in-depth analysis…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >