Is Bitcoin Fairly Valued?

May 02, 2024 | Nic Solecki, CBDA, Research Analyst

Despite mixed performance to start 2024, bitcoin finished the first quarter up roughly 68%. Buoyed by a broad weakening of foreign currencies, persistent inflationary pressures, and the January launch of almost a dozen U.S. spot-based ETFs, an extended February rally drove bitcoin’s market value to several all-time highs, peaking around $73,000 in mid-March. In the face of a relatively remarkable ascension, observers may find themselves wondering if bitcoin’s recent values are fundamentally justified or if they are simply the latest bout of speculative frenzy.

Before delving in, it’s crucial to understand the distinction between market values and fair values. Market values are the day-to-day prices of an asset that tend to fluctuate due to a dynamic interplay of supply, demand, immediate market conditions, and investor behavior. Fair values, on the other hand, represent the intrinsic worth of an asset based on its underlying economic fundamentals. In the context of a currency, inflation rates provide insight into current and future purchasing power, while yields help assess the potential attractiveness and risk of an investment. By analyzing the relative differences in these factors for a currency pair at a given point in time, investors can gauge whether a currency is relatively overvalued or undervalued.

While it is debatable whether bitcoin can be truly be labeled as a currency, we approach this analysis with that presumption, and readily recognize that the infancy of bitcoin and the broader cryptocurrency market lends itself to a wide measure of valuation methods. That said, illustrated above in blue is the discounted value of bitcoin, flanked by its implied fair value range in light teal.¹ Since currencies are free-floating and often subjected to speculative short-term shocks, and because rate environments can shift relatively quickly, fair value ranges tend to be more useful for analysis than a single point-in-time value. As such, the fair value range highlighted in teal reflects the historical variance of discounted values. Critically, the spot price of bitcoin consistently falls within the fair values computed by the model, which allows us to assess today’s price versus the range computed by our model.

So, is bitcoin overvalued or undervalued? Based on the ranges and values implied by the terminal discounted cash flow method, bitcoin appears to have closed the first quarter at elevated levels and moderated near its discounted fair value in April. It is important to reiterate several points. The discounted cash flow method used in this analysis is one of several potential methods for valuation, and other conclusions will likely vary. Floating currency and cryptocurrency valuations are dynamic, constantly shifting with inflation, real yields, and other factors. The fair values illustrated above are exclusive to the U.S. dollar and bitcoin; their bearing on the relative valuations of other currencies has not been expressed or implied. This point-in-time analysis should not be interpreted as forward-looking as past performance trends do not guarantee future results. Ultimately, this is one take on analyzing the price of bitcoin within a historical context and an eye on forward price behavior. Future price behavior will provide further opportunities to validate this approach to pricing.

¹The discounted terminal values of bitcoin are based on a discounted cashflow model that incorporates U.S. Treasury rates and bitcoin mining rewards with an imputed risk premium. 

Print PDF

Nic Solecki, CBDA
Research Analyst

Get to Know Nic

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Three-line chart showing cumulative returns for the KOSPI Index, SK Hynix, and SK Hynix Daily 2x Leveraged ETF from June 30, 2025 to June 30, 2026. While the KOSPI Index is at 137% cumulative, SK Hynix is at 671% and the ETF is at 948%, highlighting the growing role of ETFs. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

07.20.2026

Wagging the Dog

Our most recent Chart of the Week publication discussed how the AI investment opportunity has expanded beyond…

Seven-line chart showing cumulative return for Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Samsung, SK Hynix, Microsoft, and Micron from January 2026 through July 10, 2026. Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron have all outperformed other companies shown, highlighting the increasing demand for hardware in the current surge of AI-related infrastructure manufacturing. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

07.13.2026

The Modern Gold Rush

One of the enduring lessons of the California Gold Rush is that the greatest fortunes were often made not by…

Column chart showing share of private equity exit value by type in billions across acquisition, buyout, public listing, and continuation vehicles annually, 2016 to 2026 YTD. Since 2019, continuation vehicles have grown in share, with 2025 at their highest level of $98b. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

07.06.2026

To CV or Not to CV?

Since traditional exit routes have remained constrained in recent years due to higher interest rates, valuation gaps, and a subdued…

Stacked column chart showing income return and capital return for various infrastructure sectors. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.29.2026

Balancing Growth and Income in Infrastructure

This week’s chart highlights the varying return profiles across key infrastructure sectors by illustrating the split between income and capital…

Two-line chart showing median and average time in years for global unicorns to exit, 2016 to 2025. The 2025 data point (9.2 years median, 9.7 years average) is the highest point charted. In 2016, the median was 6.1 years and average was 6.0. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.22.2026

The VC Convergence Era

When Benchmark, one of Silicon Valley’s most renowned early-stage venture capital firms, closed $2 billion across two new funds this…

Two-line chart showing Private Construction Spending for Data Centers and Public Construction Spending for Transportation from December 2013 to present in billions of dollars. Data Centers in 2013 were $1.6 billion and Transportation was $28.7 billion. Since 2022, Data Center spending has increased quickly; Transportation has increased overall but relatively steadily. April 30, 2026 data point for Data Centers was 50.7, while Transportation was 49.9. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.15.2026

Centers of Attention

The rapid buildout of artificial intelligence infrastructure is reshaping the U.S. investment landscape. According to recent Census Bureau data, spending…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >