The Link Between MiGs and Treasury Curves

March 31, 2023 | Frank Valle, CFA, CAIA, Associate Director of Fixed Income

In the movie Top Gun, Charlie asks Maverick, “Well if you were directly above him, how could you see him?” Maverick’s response left Charlie in a state of shock: “I was inverted.” That same sense of shock hit bond investors as the Treasury curve inversion breached 100bps on March 7. Treasury curves are normally upward sloping with shorter maturity notes having lower interest rates than longer maturity bonds. The spread between 2-year Treasuries and 10-year Treasuries is a commonly cited statistic to describe the shape of the Treasury curve, with the 2-year note sensitive to Fed policy and the 10-year note driven by economic growth and inflation.

Treasury curves generally flatten when the fed funds rate rises, via a rise in the 2-year yield, and steepen when the fed funds rate falls, via a lower 2-year yield. A flattened Treasury curve typically steepens as higher rates drive up unemployment and push the economy toward recession, leading the Fed to cut rates. Though less likely, a flat curve could also steepen via rising back-end rates, which would require strong global growth forecasts with natural levels of inflation and unemployment.

The Fed first started to raise rates in 2016 after holding near zero following the Global Financial Crisis. The curve started to flatten and the spread between twos and tens approached zero. The Fed eased off its slow hiking cycle in 2019 and the curve started steepening. In 2020 as COVID hit, the Fed quickly took the fed funds rate to zero and pushed the curve to 50bps. The curve further steepened as back-end rates moved higher with inflation, to a peak of 158bps in 2021. With heightened inflation proving to be more sustainable than initially expected, the curve started to flatten as the market anticipated rate hikes. As the Fed continued to raise rates throughout 2022, the curve moved from flat to inverted, hitting -56bps by year-end.

While 2023 has seen the magnitude of rate hikes slow, the Fed has reiterated that it would maintain its restrictive policy stance until inflation was tamed. After a hot jobs number and an unexpected pickup in PCE inflation, the curve hit its most inverted — -109bps on March 8. Days later, two regional U.S. bank failures (Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank), the collapse of Credit Suisse, and the subsequent change in tone from Fed Chairman Powell at the FOMC’s March meeting led to expectations that the hiking cycle is near its end, causing the Treasury curve to steepen. The curve hit -40bps before returning to -60bps to end the first quarter. So far, the curve steepening has followed typical patterns — the 2-year fell by 68bps in March, while the 10-year was down 38bps.

The shape of the Treasury curve varies over time. Market forces are more impactful further out on the curve, but short-term rates are heavily impacted by Fed policy. The curve flattened and then inverted as the Fed raised rates. While no one has a crystal ball, the most likely outcome from here is that the curve will steepen once the Fed starts cutting rates, causing the 2-year to follow.

Print PDF > The Link Between MiGs and Treasury Curves

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Frank Valle, CFA, CAIA
Associate Director of Fixed Income

Get to Know Frank

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Column chart showing redemption volume for business development companies (PDCs) in billions of dollars by quarter, 1Q 2022 to 2Q 2026. Filled redemptions are shown in solid orange, but 1Q and 2Q 2026 also include stacked lighter orange for Unmet Redemptions data (-$6.5B and -$9.7B, respectively). Up to the second half of 2025, volume hovered at less than -$2B, but has since increased. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

07.27.2026

Liquidity Isn’t Free

The rapid growth of non-traded business development companies (BDCs), which are investment vehicles that pool investor capital to make loans…

07.24.2026

2026 Halftime Market Insights

This video is a recording of a live webinar held July 23 by Marquette’s research team analyzing the first half…

07.22.2026

Under the Radar for the Second Half

The usual midyear version of these letters has touched on year-to-date performance as well as the most influential macroeconomic and…

Three-line chart showing cumulative returns for the KOSPI Index, SK Hynix, and SK Hynix Daily 2x Leveraged ETF from June 30, 2025 to June 30, 2026. While the KOSPI Index is at 137% cumulative, SK Hynix is at 671% and the ETF is at 948%, highlighting the growing role of ETFs. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

07.20.2026

Wagging the Dog

Our most recent Chart of the Week publication discussed how the AI investment opportunity has expanded beyond…

Seven-line chart showing cumulative return for Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Samsung, SK Hynix, Microsoft, and Micron from January 2026 through July 10, 2026. Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron have all outperformed other companies shown, highlighting the increasing demand for hardware in the current surge of AI-related infrastructure manufacturing. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

07.13.2026

The Modern Gold Rush

One of the enduring lessons of the California Gold Rush is that the greatest fortunes were often made not by…

Column chart showing share of private equity exit value by type in billions across acquisition, buyout, public listing, and continuation vehicles annually, 2016 to 2026 YTD. Since 2019, continuation vehicles have grown in share, with 2025 at their highest level of $98b. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

07.06.2026

To CV or Not to CV?

Since traditional exit routes have remained constrained in recent years due to higher interest rates, valuation gaps, and a subdued…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >