Playing Politics Helps Emerging Market Investors

May 30, 2014 | Nat Kellogg, CFA, President

After a very disappointing year in 2013, emerging market equities got off to a rough start in 2014, underperforming U.S. stocks by 2.2% during the first quarter. However, emerging markets stocks have recently started to show signs of life, up over 5% since the end of March and outperforming U.S. markets. This may come as a surprise to some as the economic data out of China has remained weak and there have been only modest improvements in the current account balances of the “fragile five” (Indonesia, India, Turkey, South Africa, and Brazil). So why the outperformance?

While we mostly focus on economic data and the business cycle to inform our understanding of financial markets, it is important to remember that politics can play a role as well, particularly in emerging markets. This week’s chart looks at the impact of two recent political events on financial markets.

First, the blue line on this chart shows the cumulative price performance, on a quarter-to-date (“QTD”) basis, for the Sensex Index, the main stock market index in India. As the chart shows, improved equity market performance has coincided with the recent Indian election in which Narendra Modi and the BJP party recently won a sweeping victory. Mr. Modi has an impressive record of reform and growth from his days as the Chief Minister of Gujarat and has been elected with a mandate to improve economic growth by cutting red tape and loosening restrictive labor markets.

Second, Gazprom (the largest energy company in Russia) shares have rallied recently ahead of Putin’s much anticipated visit to Beijing. This visit culminated on May 23rd with the announcement that Russia had signed a $400 billion, 30-year pact to supply China with natural gas. Gazprom is the largest natural gas producer in Russia and is likely to be the largest direct beneficiary of the agreement.

India represents 7.08% of the MSCI Emerging Markets index and Gazprom represents 1.27% of the MSCI Emerging Markets index and is the sixth-largest holding in the index. As a result, these recent political developments have had a meaningful effect on the performance of emerging market investors’ portfolios and serve as a reminder that political — as well as economic — developments can drive equity market returns.

Nat Kellogg, CFA
President

Get to Know Nat

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Stacked column chart showing Weight in S&P 500 Index in 1985, 1995, 2005, 2015, and 2025 for top 10 companies at that time, with companies stacked for each year by weight. From 1985-2015, top 10 weight ranged from 17.6% to 21.1%, but 2025's weight was 40.6%. Company makeup changes over time, with no companies from 1985/1995 categories in 2025. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

05.04.2026

This Too Shall Reconstitute

Rooted in medieval Persian Sufi thought, the adage “this too shall pass” speaks to the fleeting and impermanent nature of…

Three-line chart comparing cumulative returns for MSCI EM Latin America Index, MSCI EAFE Index, and S&P 500 Index, Jan 1, 2026 through April 24, 2026. Dashed line at February 28 demarcates U.S. strikes on Iran. While all three indices dipped after war began, Latin America Index was higher to begin with and remains high. Most recent data point (4/24) for Latin America is 20.36%, EAFE is 5.7%, and S&P 500 is 5.06%. For full dataset, please email marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.27.2026

Let’s Hear It for Latin America

Latin American equity markets have shown remarkable strength in 2026. After a strong start to the year, the MSCI Emerging…

04.23.2026

We’ve Seen This Before

Diversify. Rebalance. Stay invested. Every one of these letters has concluded with that same advice in some shape or form….

Two-line chart showing unemployment rate for All U.S. Workers and Recent College Graduates (Ages 22–27), 12/31/05 to 12/31/25. Up to 2020 period, Recent College Graduates generally had a lower unemployment rate than all U.S. workers category, but since then, the opposite has been true. Lines begin at ~3% to ~5% range in 2005, rose during Global Financial Crisis of '07-'09 to near 10% for All, ~7% for Grads, then both lines declined fairly steadily up to COVID. Peak for both series was 6/30/20, with All at 12.8% and Grads at 13.4%. Most recent data for 12/31/25 is ~4% for All and ~5.5% for Grads. For full dataset, please email marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.20.2026

The Sorrows of Young Workers

Entry-level jobs have traditionally served as the primary bridge between education and stable employment, offering young workers a foothold from…

Combination column and line chart showing Net Duties Received (columns, left-hand axis, ranging $0 to $35 billion) and Effective Tariff Rate (line, right-hand axis, ranging 0 to 12%) monthly, from April 2024 through February 2025. Up to March 2025, both data series held relatively steady, averaging around $7B for net duties received, and 2% for effective tariff rate, but both series have quadrupled since then. Most recent (Feb-26) is $26B and 8%. Please contact us for the full data set at marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.13.2026

Liberation Day: One Year Later

On April 2, 2025, President Donald Trump announced a sweeping set of tariffs on imports into the United States. Dubbed…

Line chart showing commercial & industrial loans as percent of total bank credit since 1980. Peak of line is September 1982 at 38%; since then there has been a steady decrease, with several peaks following global crises, with February 2026 datapoint at 21%. Basel I labeled at 1988, Basel II labeled at 2004, Basel III labeled at 2010. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.06.2026

Regulation Abdication?

The Basel capital framework was created to ensure that banks maintain sufficient capital to absorb losses and reduce the risk…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >