Bulls on Parade: What’s Driving the 2021 Digital Asset Rally?

November 18, 2021 | Nic Solecki, Research Associate

The first bitcoin futures ETF — the ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF — was approved on October 15th, making it easier for investors to access the most well-known cryptocurrency. Not surprisingly, Bitcoin’s network value (the market capitalization) surged on the announcement, reaching $1.13T (equating to $61,571 per coin). However, this was not the first time Bitcoin’s capitalization crossed $1T: as the orange line in the chart shows, Bitcoin’s total value has crossed this threshold several times since 2020, with significant volatility along the way.

Certainly, the ProShares ETF approval has provided more access to investors, and the October run-up can at least be partially attributed to this new channel. However, there also appears to be an evolving demand dynamic in terms of investor type, which could create broader acceptance of cryptocurrency as an asset class in the coming years. We can examine this trend by looking at the types of transactions on the bitcoin network to see what has changed over the last five years.

Illustrated in blue and on the left axis is bitcoin’s daily exchange-to-network flow ratio: this measures bitcoin transfers on open exchanges (both inflows and outflows) as a percent of total network transfers. The total network is a classic ledger of accounts, the blockchain technology which serves as the foundation for all cryptocurrencies; transfers are debits and credits to and from accounts. Transfers are classified as either open exchange (retail investors), or over the counter (i.e., wholesale, OTC — more akin to institutional investors). As the ratios in blue approximate open exchange flows, the remaining network transfers approximate OTC flows. Overlaying exchange flows and network value propounds the degree to which exchanges drive or do not drive asset appreciation. To that point, the data illustrated above suggests three points:

  • Historically, retail participants via open exchanges drove Bitcoin demand. Daily exchange-to-network flows surged from mid-2017 through mid-2020, averaging ~35.2%, with a high of 99.4%.
  • Around August 2020, the drivers of demand shifted. Daily exchange-to-network flows decreased and have sustained five-year lows, averaging ~15.4% in 2021, with a low of 0.8%.
  • OTC transfers correspond with the 2021 rally, averaging ~84.6% of network transfers. Although it is not definitive, this implies institutional wholesale transfers are the dominant driver of Bitcoin’s value appreciation through 2021.

Taking this analysis a step further, it appears that more institutional money is driving demand for bitcoin. In the past, the infancy of the asset class coupled with the radical volatility of returns was enough to frighten most institutional investors off. If the trend suggested by this chart continues, however, bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies may become a more common holding across institutional portfolios.

Print PDF > Bulls on Parade: What’s Driving the 2021 Digital Asset Rally?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Nic Solecki
Research Associate

Get to Know Nic

Related Content

Line chart showing the personal savings rate and personal consumption amongst Americans. Chart subtitle: Personal savings rates have retreated from pandemic-induced highs, however several potential headwinds still face the American consumer this holiday season Chart description: Y-axis ranges from -15% to +30%. X-axis shows quarters from 3Q16 to 3Q21. Line for Personal Savings Rate is purple and line for Personal Consumption (Quarter-Over-Quarter Change) is dark green. Both lines were relatively steady up to 2Q20 as the coronavirus pandemic took hold of the economy. The Personal Savings Rate peaked in that quarter to 26.0% and the Consumption Rate Change decreased to the extremein 2Q20 then peaked the following quarter with a 10% increase. Both levels have returned to just slightly higher than normal levels in recent quarters. Chart source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis as of September 30, 2021.

12.02.2021

‘Tis the Season for Consumer Spending?

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant changes to, among a plethora of other things, consumer behavior in the United States….

11.29.2021

In Context Video: Is the 60/40 Portfolio Dead Forever?

In this video, the authors of our recent white paper discuss the 60/40 model portfolio —…

11.23.2021

Certainty Over Uncertainty: Biden Nominates Powell for Another Term as Fed Chair

In a move especially pivotal given today’s elevated inflation as the economy is resuscitated out of the pandemic, President Joe…

11.11.2021

Defined Contribution Plan Legislative Update – 4Q 2021

This legislative update covers Congress’ continued negotiation of retirement legislation with the hope of finalizing Secure Act 2.0 early next…

11.10.2021

Holiday Supply Chain Woes Linger

Headlines continue to buzz with worries of supply network dysfunction that seem to span every link of the chain, from…

Combination chart showing number of regulatory actions by the Chinese government (columns) and MSCI China Index cumulative returns (line) by month. Chart subtitle: In recent months, Chinese equities have been hampered by new regulations from Beijing authorities aimed at a variety of industries . Chart description: Left Y-axis shows Cumulative Return in percent of the MSCI China Index, from -20% to +15%. X-axis shows months from November 2020 to September 2021. Right Y-axis shows Number of Beijing Regulatory Actions from 0 to 35. The x-axis line is at the 0% mark for the Cumulative Return axis. Prior to this summer, the number of regulatory actions was very low, typically less than 5 per month in the data shown. In May 2021, there were 9 actions; June saw 3, then July had 14, August had 31, and September had 24. The MSCI China Index has struggled with this increase and has been negative each month since June. Chart Sources: Bloomberg, Cornerstone, and MFS; data as of September 30, 2021.

11.09.2021

China: Regulators, Mount Up!

Over the last year, the Chinese government has enacted a series of new regulations targeting several domestic industries including finance,…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >