When Do Rising Rates Matter the Most?

May 04, 2021 | Evan Frazier, CAIA, Research Analyst, U.S. Equities

Scatter chart showing correlation of 10-year Treasury Yield and Correlation of Treasury Yield vs. S&P 500 Return. Chart subtitle: Rising rates have a bigger impact on equities when Treasury yields are much higher than they are today. Chart description: Y-axis shows Rolling 1-Year Correlation: Monthly Change in Treasury Yield vs. Monthly S&P 500 Return, ranging from -1 to +1. X-axis shows 10-Year Treasury Yield from 0-18%. Two series are scattered: Before the Global Financial Crisis in brown and After the Global Financial Crisis in orange. There is some slight overlap of the two around the 3-4% Treasury Yield mark, but otherwise the majority of the Pre-GFC series is to the right of the 4% yield mark and ranges across the x-axis for the full -1 to +1 correlation. The Post-GFC series is primarily above the x-axis, though there are some below, and in the first 4% of yield. March 31, 2021 is highlighted at a correlation of 0.299 and the Treasury yield at 1.74%. Chart source: Source: Bloomberg as of March 31, 2021. Pre GFC: December 1970 – August 2007. Post GFC: September 2007 (FOMC began reducing the federal funds rate) – March 2021.

The first quarter of 2021 saw the 10-year Treasury yield nearly double, which had a profoundly negative impact on growth-oriented and higher-valuation stocks. Generally, higher interest rates are expected to lead to lower equity returns and vice versa, all else equal. While the pace of change in the 10-year during the first quarter was enough to rattle investors, data from the last decade does not support an overall negative correlation between the movement in interest rates and equity returns. Since the Global Financial Crisis (“GFC”), monthly returns of the S&P 500 Index and monthly changes in the 10-year Treasury yield have exhibited correlations ranging from modestly negative to strongly positive. This is in stark contrast to the correlations from previous decades, when equity returns and interest rate movements tended to be strongly inversely related, as conventional wisdom would suggest. Roughly 75% of the monthly correlation observations from 1970 to the beginning of the Global Financial Crisis were negative, compared to less than 14% from the GFC to the present day. While many variables likely contributed to this disconnect, the absolute level of interest rates may be the most important factor.

Though it is difficult to precisely quantify the impact, the extremely low yield environment of the past decade has clearly been a boon to stock prices. During periods of low rates, investors tend to shun conservative assets like bonds and turn to equities for yield, otherwise known as the “TINA” effect (i.e., market participants believe “there is no alternative” to stocks in low-rate climates). This phenomenon manifests itself in the form of the equity risk premium (the S&P 500 earnings yield less the 10-year Treasury yield), which has indicated the relative attractiveness of equities for nearly two decades. Low rates also benefit stock price valuations, calculated as expected future cash flows of companies pulled forward to the present day using a discount factor based on the risk-free interest rate. When yields are low, the denominators in those present value calculations are also low, leading to higher valuations. So, despite rates ticking up during various periods in the last decade, stock prices largely continued to rise as rates stayed extremely low on an absolute and historical basis. It is also worth noting that during exogenous shocks like the GFC and COVID-19, both yields and equity prices saw dramatic decreases, contributing to the positive correlation over the last several years.

At higher absolute levels of interest rates, however, the data show a stronger negative correlation between yield changes and equity price movements. The idea that the absolute level of interest rates helps determine the extent to which movements in yields impact equities begs the question: Is there an inflection point at which increases in rates are more likely to lead to diminished equity returns? While there are many factors at play, a quadratic regression on the correlations observed from 1970 through today implies that negative correlations begin at a 10-year Treasury yield of around 5.8%. For investors, this may help allay concerns about the impact of future rate hikes, with the 10-year still below 2%. That said, the era of easy money that has persisted for more than a decade may be drawing to a close, and investors should consider the implications of increasingly restrictive monetary policy going forward.

Print PDF > When Do Rising Rates Matter the Most?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Evan Frazier, CAIA
Research Analyst, U.S. Equities

Get to Know Evan

Related Content

Combined area and line chart showing SPAC deals and gross proceeds since 2009 by year. Chart subtitle: 2021 has already seen a record number of SPAC deals and gross proceeds. Chart description: Left Y-axis shows Gross Proceeds in $ Billions, ranging from 0-1,200. X-axis shows years from 2009 to 2021 as of April 28. Right Y-axis shows IPO count from 0-350. Gross proceeds in area is minimal from 2009 to 2014, with steady increase from 2014-2019 and a huge jump in 2020 ($83B) and 2021 ($100B). Line of IPO count follows similar trend (2020: 248 IPOs, 2021: 308 IPOs). Chart source: SPACInsider as of April 28, 2021.

04.29.2021

What’s Next for SPACs?

The ferocious appetite for Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continued its momentum throughout the first quarter of 2021. Investors could…

04.26.2021

One Year Later, What’s Next?

Welcome to our inaugural quarterly client newsletter! As a way of introduction, I am Greg Leonberger, Director of Research here…

04.08.2021

Q1 2021 Market Insights Video

This video features an in-depth analysis of the first quarter’s performance by Marquette’s research analysts and directors, reviewing general themes…

Two charts showing changes in private equity add-on acquisition activity. Chart subtitles: Left reads, "Add-on acquisitions have increased as a share of buyouts," and right reads, "Add-on acquisitions no longer increase holding periods." First chart description: Combined stacked columns and line chart. Left y-axis for columns shows Deal Count, ranging from 0-5,000. X-axis shows years 2002-2020. Right y-axis for line shows Add-Ons as a % of Buyouts as range of percentages from 0-80%. Line has steadily increased since 2002, from 43% to 72% in 2020. The total number of Deals has increased significantly; each stacked column shows deals that were add-ons and were not add-ons which, with add-ons also steadily increasing. Second chart description: Line chart. Y-axis shows Median Years to Exit. X-axis shows years from 2006-2020. There are three lines with the following category labels: 0 Add-ons; 1-4 add-ons; 5+ add-ons. In 2006, the 5+add-ons category was near 7 years holding time and the 1-4 add-ons category and 0 add-ons categories were near 4, but in 2020, all three categories were all very close to 5 years. Chart source: Pitchbook as of December 31, 2020.

04.21.2021

PE Pursues Buy-and-Build

Add-on investments, a company acquired by a private equity firm to be added to one of its platform companies, have…

Line chart showing U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) in tan and MSCI EM Local Returns in purple. Chart subtitle: MSCI EM Local Currency returns are negatively correlated with the U.S. dollar Chart description: Left Y-axis shows DXY Index range from 80 to 105. Right Y-axis shows MSCI EM Local Cumulative Return range from -30 to +50%. X-axis shows dates from January 2018 to present, in quarterly increments. Correlation of the two lines is generally very aligned; when the dollar line goes up, EM goes down and vice versa. In late March 2020, the dollar spiked to its highest level shown in the chart (102.5) and EM returns dropped sharply (-22.6%), but both have reversed since then, crossing several times in the fall, and now EM is up (32.9%) while the dollar is down (92.1). Chart source: Bloomberg as of April 12, 2021.

04.13.2021

Weak Dollar, Strong EM

For U.S.-based investors, the movement of the dollar has a direct and indirect impact on emerging market equity returns. The…

Line chart showing NPI All Property Cap Rates and 10 Year U.S. Treasury Yield. Chart subtitle: NPI All Property Cap Rates have remained flat through the current cycle. Chart description: Y-axis shows percentages frfom 0 to 16%. X-axis shows years from 1981 to present. Recession periods are shaded and labeled marking the beginning of real estate cycles: 1991-1992 for Severe RE Oversupply, 2008-2009 for Global Financial Crisis, and 2020-present for Covid. Line for NPI All Property Cap Rate is blue and rises within the previous two recessions but shows no change for the present recession. 10-year yield line shows changes during each recession. Chart source: NCREIF, FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data); Cap Rates are of the NCREIF NPI U.S. All Property Index.

04.07.2021

Where’s the Blowout?

A typical real estate cycle has four phases: recovery, expansion, hypersupply, and recession. Typically, the recession phase is marked by…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >