The Impact of Russia’s Invasion on Bond Indices

March 17, 2022 | Frank Valle, CFA, CAIA, Associate Director of Fixed Income

Five-line chart showing JPMorgan index weights of various Russian and Ukrainian bond indices. Chart subtitle: Russia’s weight in JPMorgan’s bond indices has fallen sharply ahead of removal at month-end. Chart visual description: Y-axis shows Index Weight in percentage, ranging from 0% to 10%. X-axis shows dates by six-month interval, from December 2016 to December 2021 (data through March 4, 2022). Russia EMBI Global line in blue; Russia CEMBI BD line in light blue; Russia GBI-EM line in very dark blue; Ukraine EMBI Global line in brown; Ukraine CEMBI BD line in tan. Chart data description: At chart data start in 2016, Russia indices weights' were between 5-7% for all three indices displayed, and Ukraine's were 0.5% and 2%. As of March 4, 2022, Russia EMBI Global was at 0.6%, Russia GBI-EM was at 0.5%, Russia CEMBI BD was at 1.0%, Ukraine EMBI Global was at 0.3%, and Ukraine CEMBI BD was at 0.3%. Source: JPMorgan.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has meaningfully altered the emerging market landscape. At the start of the year, Russia and Ukraine combined had comprised almost 5% of the hard-dollar index, JPMorgan EMBI Global, and the hard-dollar emerging market corporate index, JPMorgan CEMBI, with 3–4% in Russia and roughly 1% in Ukraine. In local markets, represented by the JPMorgan GBI-EM, Russia was approximately 7% of the index, while Ukrainian local bonds were scheduled for index inclusion at the end of March.

Since the invasion in February, Ukrainian debt, already stressed, has fallen further, and now represents less than 0.5% of the hard-dollar indices. Its inclusion in the local index is on hold until further review due to market disruptions. Foreign sanctions and self-imposed capital restrictions have pushed Russian dollar debt to distressed levels, with Russia unlikely to pay external debts in hard dollars. Local bonds are still trading near par, though a weakening currency has reduced the value to international investors. At present, Russia represents no more than 1% in the hard-dollar or local indices and will be removed by JPMorgan entirely at month-end as sanctions have made the debt illiquid and uninvestable. Belarus is also facing removal from JPMorgan’s ESG indices for its role in the conflict.

Managers face a tough decision regarding holdings in Russia. The local bond market is frozen for international trading. Although local bonds are trading near par in the domestic market, many managers are pricing holdings at zero. External debt is distressed but the market continues to function and there have been bright spots, with Russian energy giant Gazprom redeeming a bond, priced down to 50 cents on the dollar, at par on March 7th. With the write-down already taken and the removal from indices, Russian debt could be a source of upside in a recovery scenario, though uncertainties and risks certainly remain. Prudent risk management and process consistency remain key factors for Marquette as we analyze and recommend funds to clients.

Print PDF > The Impact of Russia’s Invasion on Bond Indices

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Frank Valle, CFA, CAIA
Associate Director of Fixed Income

Get to Know Frank

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Column chart showing redemption volume for business development companies (PDCs) in billions of dollars by quarter, 1Q 2022 to 2Q 2026. Filled redemptions are shown in solid orange, but 1Q and 2Q 2026 also include stacked lighter orange for Unmet Redemptions data (-$6.5B and -$9.7B, respectively). Up to the second half of 2025, volume hovered at less than -$2B, but has since increased. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

07.27.2026

Liquidity Isn’t Free

The rapid growth of non-traded business development companies (BDCs), which are investment vehicles that pool investor capital to make loans…

07.24.2026

2026 Halftime Market Insights

This video is a recording of a live webinar held July 23 by Marquette’s research team analyzing the first half…

07.22.2026

Under the Radar for the Second Half

The usual midyear version of these letters has touched on year-to-date performance as well as the most influential macroeconomic and…

Three-line chart showing cumulative returns for the KOSPI Index, SK Hynix, and SK Hynix Daily 2x Leveraged ETF from June 30, 2025 to June 30, 2026. While the KOSPI Index is at 137% cumulative, SK Hynix is at 671% and the ETF is at 948%, highlighting the growing role of ETFs. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

07.20.2026

Wagging the Dog

Our most recent Chart of the Week publication discussed how the AI investment opportunity has expanded beyond…

Seven-line chart showing cumulative return for Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Samsung, SK Hynix, Microsoft, and Micron from January 2026 through July 10, 2026. Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron have all outperformed other companies shown, highlighting the increasing demand for hardware in the current surge of AI-related infrastructure manufacturing. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

07.13.2026

The Modern Gold Rush

One of the enduring lessons of the California Gold Rush is that the greatest fortunes were often made not by…

Column chart showing share of private equity exit value by type in billions across acquisition, buyout, public listing, and continuation vehicles annually, 2016 to 2026 YTD. Since 2019, continuation vehicles have grown in share, with 2025 at their highest level of $98b. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

07.06.2026

To CV or Not to CV?

Since traditional exit routes have remained constrained in recent years due to higher interest rates, valuation gaps, and a subdued…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >