The Impact of Russia’s Invasion on Bond Indices

March 17, 2022 | Frank Valle, CFA, CAIA, Associate Director of Fixed Income

Five-line chart showing JPMorgan index weights of various Russian and Ukrainian bond indices. Chart subtitle: Russia’s weight in JPMorgan’s bond indices has fallen sharply ahead of removal at month-end. Chart visual description: Y-axis shows Index Weight in percentage, ranging from 0% to 10%. X-axis shows dates by six-month interval, from December 2016 to December 2021 (data through March 4, 2022). Russia EMBI Global line in blue; Russia CEMBI BD line in light blue; Russia GBI-EM line in very dark blue; Ukraine EMBI Global line in brown; Ukraine CEMBI BD line in tan. Chart data description: At chart data start in 2016, Russia indices weights' were between 5-7% for all three indices displayed, and Ukraine's were 0.5% and 2%. As of March 4, 2022, Russia EMBI Global was at 0.6%, Russia GBI-EM was at 0.5%, Russia CEMBI BD was at 1.0%, Ukraine EMBI Global was at 0.3%, and Ukraine CEMBI BD was at 0.3%. Source: JPMorgan.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has meaningfully altered the emerging market landscape. At the start of the year, Russia and Ukraine combined had comprised almost 5% of the hard-dollar index, JPMorgan EMBI Global, and the hard-dollar emerging market corporate index, JPMorgan CEMBI, with 3–4% in Russia and roughly 1% in Ukraine. In local markets, represented by the JPMorgan GBI-EM, Russia was approximately 7% of the index, while Ukrainian local bonds were scheduled for index inclusion at the end of March.

Since the invasion in February, Ukrainian debt, already stressed, has fallen further, and now represents less than 0.5% of the hard-dollar indices. Its inclusion in the local index is on hold until further review due to market disruptions. Foreign sanctions and self-imposed capital restrictions have pushed Russian dollar debt to distressed levels, with Russia unlikely to pay external debts in hard dollars. Local bonds are still trading near par, though a weakening currency has reduced the value to international investors. At present, Russia represents no more than 1% in the hard-dollar or local indices and will be removed by JPMorgan entirely at month-end as sanctions have made the debt illiquid and uninvestable. Belarus is also facing removal from JPMorgan’s ESG indices for its role in the conflict.

Managers face a tough decision regarding holdings in Russia. The local bond market is frozen for international trading. Although local bonds are trading near par in the domestic market, many managers are pricing holdings at zero. External debt is distressed but the market continues to function and there have been bright spots, with Russian energy giant Gazprom redeeming a bond, priced down to 50 cents on the dollar, at par on March 7th. With the write-down already taken and the removal from indices, Russian debt could be a source of upside in a recovery scenario, though uncertainties and risks certainly remain. Prudent risk management and process consistency remain key factors for Marquette as we analyze and recommend funds to clients.

Print PDF > The Impact of Russia’s Invasion on Bond Indices

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Frank Valle, CFA, CAIA
Associate Director of Fixed Income

Get to Know Frank

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Line chart showing average option-adjusted spreads (OAS), in basis points, on Bloomberg CCC U.S. High Yield and Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield bonds from December 2025 through October 2026. CCC-rated high yield spreads increased from approximately 600 bps to 1,100 bps, reaching their highest levels in nearly four years, while broader U.S. corporate high yield spreads remained relatively stable, increasing from approximately 260 bps to 330 bps. Source: Bloomberg as of November 6, 2026. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

11.09.2026

C’s Get Degrees (of Pain)

The U.S. distressed debt market is showing increasingly pronounced signs of stress. As of this writing, option-adjusted spreads on CCC-rated…

Bar chart comparing October and year-to-date 2026 returns for Korea, Taiwan, Brazil, India, China, and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. October returns are below zero for most markets, while year-to-date returns range from negative to positive. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

11.02.2026

The Haunting of Emerging Markets

Emerging markets faced a challenging October, with the space declining by around 8.3% amid renewed concerns over the sustainability of…

Stacked bar chart showing U.S. private equity deal value by deal size from Q1 2022 through Q2 2026. The y-axis shows percentage of total deal value from 0% to 100%, and the x-axis shows quarters by year. Stacked bar chart showing the percentage of U.S. private equity deal count by deal size from Q1 2022 through Q2 2026. The y-axis ranges from 0% to 100%, and the x-axis shows quarters by year. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

10.26.2026

Smaller Deals, Larger Appeal

Private equity activity is increasingly shifting toward smaller transactions, with total deal value for transactions of $100 million or less…

10.08.2026

3Q 2026 Market Insights

This video is a recording of a live webinar held October 22 by Marquette’s research team analyzing the third quarter…

10.22.2026

Will Higher Rates Cramp the Markets?

Anyone who has run a marathon knows the last six miles are brutal — no matter how well the first…

Line chart comparing S&P 500 Index cumulative returns for midterm and non-midterm election years since 1980. The x-axis shows October through December, and the y-axis shows S&P 500 Index cumulative return, ranging from -1% to 8%. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

10.19.2026

Divided We Rise?

Since 1980, the S&P 500 Index has generally performed well in the weeks surrounding U.S. midterm elections. Specifically, the index…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >