The Big Squeeze

February 02, 2021 | Jessica Noviskis, CFA, Portfolio Strategist, OCIO Services

Line chart showing short interest as a percent of float for several single stocks. Chart subtitle: Hedge funds under pressure as shorts rally. Chart description: Y-axis shows Short Interest as a % of Float ranging from 0-150%. X-axis shows years spanning 2016-2021. Stocks displayed include GameStop Corp, AMC Entertainment Holdings, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc, BlackBerry Ltd, and Express Inc. GameStop's line shows the highest increase, from 43% in 2016 to 122% as of January 15, 2021. AMC and Bed Bath & Beyond also show marked increases over the years, from 5% to 28% and 12% to 66%, respectively. Both BlackBerry and Express have hovered relatively low and are currently at 9% and 12% respectively. Chart source: Bloomberg.

A group of small-cap stocks made big waves last week as retail day traders collaborated online to drive up certain stock prices in order to “squeeze” hedge funds with short positions. The influence of the retail investor has been building for over a year, facilitated by reduced trading fees, new brokerage platforms, and the time and money freed up by COVID lockdowns, but the Reddit-documented campaigns to manipulate GameStop and others brought forth entirely new dynamics.

Hedge funds take short positions when they expect stock prices to fall, generally for fundamental reasons. Short positions are inherently more risky than long positions — the downside is theoretically unlimited and short positions will increase in size as the stock moves against you, but prudent long/short managers understand these risks and typically run short portfolios that are more diversified, with smaller position sizes and tighter risk management parameters. Market sentiment and positioning is a key part of their analysis, especially on the short side. Stocks with high short interest have been red flags for many managers well before the term “Gamestonk” existed.

GameStop, AMC, Bed Bath & Beyond, and other stocks being irrationally bid up have fundamentally struggled for years. Outdated business models have led to earnings declines and multiple compression, and the impact of COVID has pulled forward bankruptcy concerns. At the same time, short interest has increased, and profitably — for the three years ending June 30th, 2020, the five stocks in the chart above lost on average 59% of their value. Over the last seven months, through the end of January, the worst performer of the group has almost tripled, and GameStop is up more than 7,000%, despite a largely unchanged fundamental outlook.

A number of hedge funds holding these higher short interest stocks were significantly impacted. At the center of the drama, Melvin Capital was reportedly down more than 50% for the month. While many hedge funds did not have direct exposure, the broader issue for the group and investors is the related de-grossing — long selling and short covering — as managers look to reduce exposure to the volatility. While de-grossing is not unusual (seen most recently in March 2020, September 2019, the fourth quarter of 2018), it has been especially rapid over the last week with hedge funds coming into the year with above average levels of gross and net leverage. While this has a created a tough backdrop for hedge fund alpha, especially coming off a record year in 2020, year to date losses have been modest. Through January, the average U.S. long/short fund was down just 2.3%,¹ relative to the S&P 500 -1.0%.

While Melvin Capital and others have publicly stated that they have fully closed out short positions on GameStop, the damage has been done, and these funds will likely face ongoing investor scrutiny over their risk management processes. But the majority of long/short funds should be able to make up any early year losses, with 2021 set up to be a good year for stock pickers. Prudent managers are re-underwriting their short positions, reducing exposure to potential targets and names with higher short interest, and many are patiently planning for the inevitable next leg. Stocks do not typically remain this severely disconnected from fundamentals for long, and at these valuations could present strong short opportunities.

Print PDF > The Big Squeeze

¹ Morgan Stanley Prime Brokerage

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Jessica Noviskis, CFA
Portfolio Strategist, OCIO Services

Get to Know Jessica

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Stacked column chart showing Weight in S&P 500 Index in 1985, 1995, 2005, 2015, and 2025 for top 10 companies at that time, with companies stacked for each year by weight. From 1985-2015, top 10 weight ranged from 17.6% to 21.1%, but 2025's weight was 40.6%. Company makeup changes over time, with no companies from 1985/1995 categories in 2025. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

05.04.2026

This Too Shall Reconstitute

Rooted in medieval Persian Sufi thought, the adage “this too shall pass” speaks to the fleeting and impermanent nature of…

Three-line chart comparing cumulative returns for MSCI EM Latin America Index, MSCI EAFE Index, and S&P 500 Index, Jan 1, 2026 through April 24, 2026. Dashed line at February 28 demarcates U.S. strikes on Iran. While all three indices dipped after war began, Latin America Index was higher to begin with and remains high. Most recent data point (4/24) for Latin America is 20.36%, EAFE is 5.7%, and S&P 500 is 5.06%. For full dataset, please email marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.27.2026

Let’s Hear It for Latin America

Latin American equity markets have shown remarkable strength in 2026. After a strong start to the year, the MSCI Emerging…

04.23.2026

We’ve Seen This Before

Diversify. Rebalance. Stay invested. Every one of these letters has concluded with that same advice in some shape or form….

Two-line chart showing unemployment rate for All U.S. Workers and Recent College Graduates (Ages 22–27), 12/31/05 to 12/31/25. Up to 2020 period, Recent College Graduates generally had a lower unemployment rate than all U.S. workers category, but since then, the opposite has been true. Lines begin at ~3% to ~5% range in 2005, rose during Global Financial Crisis of '07-'09 to near 10% for All, ~7% for Grads, then both lines declined fairly steadily up to COVID. Peak for both series was 6/30/20, with All at 12.8% and Grads at 13.4%. Most recent data for 12/31/25 is ~4% for All and ~5.5% for Grads. For full dataset, please email marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.20.2026

The Sorrows of Young Workers

Entry-level jobs have traditionally served as the primary bridge between education and stable employment, offering young workers a foothold from…

Combination column and line chart showing Net Duties Received (columns, left-hand axis, ranging $0 to $35 billion) and Effective Tariff Rate (line, right-hand axis, ranging 0 to 12%) monthly, from April 2024 through February 2025. Up to March 2025, both data series held relatively steady, averaging around $7B for net duties received, and 2% for effective tariff rate, but both series have quadrupled since then. Most recent (Feb-26) is $26B and 8%. Please contact us for the full data set at marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.13.2026

Liberation Day: One Year Later

On April 2, 2025, President Donald Trump announced a sweeping set of tariffs on imports into the United States. Dubbed…

Line chart showing commercial & industrial loans as percent of total bank credit since 1980. Peak of line is September 1982 at 38%; since then there has been a steady decrease, with several peaks following global crises, with February 2026 datapoint at 21%. Basel I labeled at 1988, Basel II labeled at 2004, Basel III labeled at 2010. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.06.2026

Regulation Abdication?

The Basel capital framework was created to ensure that banks maintain sufficient capital to absorb losses and reduce the risk…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >