Is Velocity Stifling Inflation Amid Record Growth of Money Supply?

January 05, 2021 | Evan Frazier, CFA, CAIA, Senior Research Analyst

Line chart showing M2 Money Stock in teal and Velocity of M2 Money Stock in green. Chart subtitle: M2 continues to grow while money velocity dips. Chart description: Left Y-axis shows $ in billions, ranging from 0-$20,000. Right Y-axis shows Velocity from 0.0-2.5. X-axis shows time since January 2000, through August 2020. Recessions are marked by shaded grey bars, denoting the dot-com bubble in the early 2000s, the Global Financial Crisis in 2008, and the current recession which began in March 2020. M2 Money Stock line begins near $4,000 in January 2000 and is currently near $19,000. Velocity line begins near 2.0 in January 2000 and is currently near 1.2. The two lines converged around October 2015. Recently the M2 Money Stock has climbed sharply and Velocity dipped significantly in 2020 but most recently slightly grew. Chart source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis as of December 31, 2020.

Inflation has remained well below 3% in the United States for nearly a decade despite a record economic expansion and supportive monetary policy. Even after unprecedented alterations to the macroeconomic landscape in recent months, investors have not seen the significant price level increases that might have been expected in theory. This puzzling situation may be at least partially explained by the current relationship between money supply and velocity.

When it comes to economic relief efforts in the U.S. during 2020, no entity has been more active than the Federal Reserve, which has increasingly relied on open market operations with short-term interest rates near zero. Since the start of the pandemic, the Fed has purchased $3.5 trillion in Treasuries, corporate bonds, and mortgage-backed securities, and recently announced its intention to press forward with $120 billion per month in additional bond buying. The central bank’s balance sheet has now ballooned to over $7 trillion. As a result, M2 ­— a measure of the total money supply that includes narrow money, cash equivalents, and short-term deposits — spiked by roughly 25% in 2020, a record year-over-year growth figure.¹ The recent M2 surge has been accompanied by a decrease in the velocity of money, calculated as the ratio of quarterly nominal GDP to the quarterly average of M2 money stock. Put simply, velocity denotes the rate of turnover in the money supply and is a gauge of economic health, as higher velocity is usually associated with more robust economic activity. Since the beginning of 2020, money velocity has fallen by more than 20%, indicating a strong preference for saving vs. spending on the part of the American consumer since the outbreak of COVID-19.

The relationship between money supply and velocity has significant implications for security markets going forward, particularly as it relates to inflation. Investors have long been confounded by the absence of inflation in the U.S. since low interest rates and M2 growth should lead to higher price levels all else equal. Part of the reason for the lack of inflation could be lower levels of money velocity, which has largely declined since 2000 amid three significant recessions in the United States. The recent plunge in velocity may signal to central bankers that expansionary efforts could be continued in the near term without the risk of significant price level increases. As the economic recovery continues, however, velocity will necessarily rise, which could lead to interest rate hikes and the tapering of the Fed balance sheet to prevent runaway inflation. Investors should be cognizant of the possibility of restrictive monetary policy in the coming years as the world lifts itself out of recession.

Print PDF > Is Velocity Stifling Inflation Amid Record Growth of Money Supply

¹As measured on November 30, 2020

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Evan Frazier, CFA, CAIA
Senior Research Analyst

Get to Know Evan

Related Content

This chart description is for illustrative purposes only and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Please see full disclosures at end of PDF document in the web post. General description: Two charts showing secondary market activity and impact on private equity market deal pricing. Chart subtitle: As secondary volumes have risen, the market has become increasingly undercapitalized, resulting in significant discounts. Chart data description: Please contact our team for full dataset. Chart source: Hamilton Lane, Lazard as of December 31, 2022. End chart description. See disclosures at end of document.

05.25.2023

Secondaries Not So Secondary Anymore

Secondary market volume has grown from $37 billion in 2016 to a high of $132 billion in 2021. Despite macroeconomic…

This chart description is for illustrative purposes only and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Please see full disclosures at end of PDF document in the web post. General description: Area and line chart showing U.S. debt limit and debt limit suspensions since 2008. Chart subtitle: Since 1960, Congress has raised, extended, or revised the debt limit 78 separate times . Chart source: White House Office of Management and Budget, Treasury Department, WSJ. Chart visual description: Y-axis is labeled Federal Debt Subject to Limit and ranges from $0T to $35T. X-axis shows years from 2008 to 2023 with annual intervals. Debt limit is plotted in orange line. Debt Limit Suspensions are plotted in purple line. Debt overall is plotted using solid light purple area. Chart data description: Debt limit and amount of debt have steadily increased, with a noticeable jump in 2020. The limit has not been increased since January 2022, though federal debt has continued to increase. End chart description. See disclosures at end of document.

05.17.2023

Raise the Roof

Investor questions continue to mount as the U.S. nears the Treasury’s estimated debt ceiling “X-date” of June 1. While there…

05.12.2023

It’s Getting Hot in Here

If global temperatures rise more than 1.5° Celsius the planet and its inhabitants could face severe consequences as a result…

05.09.2023

Down to the Wire: An Update on the 2023 U.S. Debt Ceiling Crisis

In February of this year, Marquette published a Perspectives piece entitled Is the Sky Falling? that detailed…

This chart description is for illustrative purposes only and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Please see full disclosures at end of PDF document in the web post. General description: Three-line chart showing year-to-date returns for First Republic Bank, KBW Regional Banking Index, and S&P 500. Chart subtitle: First Republic’s stock had been under pressure since SVB’s demise, though losses escalated after the bank reported clients had withdrawn more than half of the bank’s deposits. Chart source: Bloomberg as of May 1, 2023. Chart visual description: Y-ais is labeled YTD Return and ranges from +20% to -100%. X-axis shows dates from 1/3 to 4/25 in weekly increments; data is daily. First Republic Bank is plotted in brown, KBW Regional Banking Index is plotted in slate, and S&P 500 is plotted in light blue. Chart data description: Up to mid-March all three lines were positive. S&P 500 has remained positive, but KBW Regional Banking Index had a sharp decline in March, from +1.0% 3/6 to -17.5% 3/13. Since then it has slightly recovered several times, but has continued to decline overall, to -23.6% as of 5/1. First Republic Bank saw a huge decline in March, from 0.1% on 3/6 to -74.4% on 3/13. Since then, FRB has continued to decline, and as of 5/1, it hit -100%. End chart description. See disclosures at end of document.

05.02.2023

The Eagle Has Fallen

When First Republic Bank’s 84 branches opened Monday morning, they belonged to the since-failed bank in signage alone after a…

This chart description is for illustrative purposes only and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Please see full disclosures at end of PDF document in the web post. General description: Chart reports % of respondents that have noted certain percentages of decrease in cost and increase in revenue since adopting AI. Chart subtitle: Organizations that have adopted AI report seeing both cost savings and increases in revenue as a result. Chart source: Stanford University AI Index Report 2023. Full public data available at https://aiindex.stanford.edu/report/. End chart description. See disclosures at end of document.

04.26.2023

Unleashing the Power of AI

The launch of ChatGPT — a chatbot technology that can mimic human-like understanding and generate well-crafted, conversational responses — marks…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >