What’s Realistic for GDP?

June 02, 2017

Though GDP growth varies greatly throughout an economic cycle, the last several decades have seen it slowly decline. One of the many promises made by Trump and other presidential candidates during the election was to restore GDP to its higher levels once again. But even with beneficial policy changes, is it possible to achieve 3%-4% year-over-year growth?

GDP growth essentially comes from two areas: an increase in the number of workers or an improvement in output per worker. Output per worker, or productivity, generally comes from businesses investing in technology and equipment to improve efficiency.  In this week’s chart, we’ve estimated this by taking the difference between growth in GDP and total workers. As the chart shows, productivity gained very little the last several years as most of GDP’s growth came from an improvement in the employment situation. The exception to this came during the financial crisis when employers tried to cut costs and become leaner. It seems after this there has been little room for businesses to become more efficient.

What makes this concerning is that the growth seen in employment is not sustainable. With the unemployment rate at about 4.5%, we are either at or nearing full employment, meaning that any growth in workers has to come from people joining the worker force. However, the opposite is expected over the next 10 years as baby bombers continue to retire. This suggests that productivity will have to improve just to maintain the current growth rate of the economy. While things like tax reform and infrastructure spending should boost growth, it seems unlikely that GDP will return to more historic levels any time soon.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

06.25.2026

Commodities: An Overview of the Asset Class

Commodities represent a unique asset class within global financial markets. Like equities and bonds, commodity prices are influenced by the…

Two-line chart showing median and average time in years for global unicorns to exit, 2016 to 2025. The 2025 data point (9.2 years median, 9.7 years average) is the highest point charted. In 2016, the median was 6.1 years and average was 6.0. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.22.2026

The VC Convergence Era

When Benchmark, one of Silicon Valley’s most renowned early-stage venture capital firms, closed $2 billion across two new funds this…

Two-line chart showing Private Construction Spending for Data Centers and Public Construction Spending for Transportation from December 2013 to present in billions of dollars. Data Centers in 2013 were $1.6 billion and Transportation was $28.7 billion. Since 2022, Data Center spending has increased quickly; Transportation has increased overall but relatively steadily. April 30, 2026 data point for Data Centers was 50.7, while Transportation was 49.9. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.15.2026

Centers of Attention

The rapid buildout of artificial intelligence infrastructure is reshaping the U.S. investment landscape. According to recent Census Bureau data, spending…

Line chart comparing Growth of $100 and Average Sharpe Ratio for MVIS BDC Index, Cliffwater Direct Lending Index as averages. Data goes back January 2010 through March 31, 2026. Average Sharpe for MVIS US BDC 0.4, Direct Lending 3.28, Bank Loan 0.79. Current datapoint for BDC is $425 and $479 for Direct Lending. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.08.2026

How to Launder Your Volatility

Hi, James Torgerson here! Volatility can be an unsightly blemish on portfolios and lead to inferior risk-adjusted returns. Private credit…

Column chart showing weight in MSCI Emerging Market Index for Taiwan, South Korea, and China annually since 2006. Taiwan hovered around 11% up to 2021, and has increased since then, with 2026 YTD at 26.5%. South Korea has followed a similar path, averaging about 14% 2006 to 2023; 2024 dropped to 9%, but 2025 was back up to 13.3%, and its weight has jumped to 23.1% YTD. China generally increased up to 2020, peaking at 29.7% of the index, but has since mostly decreased year to year, with 2026 YTD at 19.7%. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.01.2026

The New Face of Emerging Markets

The MSCI Emerging Markets Index has undergone a significant structural transformation in recent years. For much of the past decade,…

05.26.2026

The Best and Worst of Times

The classic novel A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens begins with the line “It was the best of…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >