Will Excess Reserves Lead to Inflation?

August 24, 2011 | Doug Oest, CAIA, Managing Partner

This week’s chart looks at the amount of excess reserves banks are holding at the Federal Reserve (orange line) along with the corresponding changes to the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet (black line). As of the end of July 2011, banks are holding over $1.6 trillion in excess reserves, which is notably higher than what historical averages would suggest. This has led some market commentators to worry about inflation escalating as banks begin to lend out those assets (note that overall loans and leases issued by commercial banks, as represented by the red line, have fallen since the Financial Crisis of 2008 – 2009).

In the United States, all depository institutions (commercial banks, savings and loans, credit unions, etc.) are required by the Fed to satisfy a reserve requirement (or liquidity ratio): each bank must retain a certain amount of cash that cannot be used for loans to business or consumers. Any reserves held above the required amount are considered “excess reserves”.

Historically, institutions have minimized their excess reserves because it is generally more profitable to issue loans than to hold the cash (the banks can earn higher amounts of interest via loans). When money is lent by banks, it can have what is called a multiplier effect on money supply: because banks only have to hold a small percentage of assets to meet the reserve requirement, they are able to increase the money supply by lending. For instance, with a 10% reserve requirement, $100 could theoretically be turned into $1,000 through the multiplier effect.

As a result of this theory, many market commentators have expressed concern over the current large level of excess reserves held by banks. Based on this macroeconomic theory, even a relatively small decline in excess reserves of $100 billion could theoretically increase the money supply by $1 trillion (assuming a reserve requirement of 10%).

The Fed is confident that inflation is not a near term threat to the economy, and when (if) inflation does become a concern, it has the tools to control the growth of price levels. A large output gap in the U.S. economy, high levels of unemployment, and slow wage growth are the most commonly cited reasons for the expected low levels of future inflation. The Fed also has a few tools to help combat inflation from excess reserves, including selling large amounts of securities from its balance sheet (either outright sales or using reverse repurchase agreements) or increasing the interest rate it pays on excess reserves to incent banks to continue to hold excess reserves. The ability to pay interest on excess reserves is a new tool for the Fed and in its view alters the theory behind the multiplier effect.

The fact remains that the U.S. is in uncharted monetary policy territory, with little historical precedent to rely on. As Fed Vice Chairman Donald Kohn said, “the calibration of our exit from these policies is complicated by a paucity of evidence on how unconventional policies work. We will need to be flexible and adjust as we gain experience”.

Doug Oest, CAIA
Managing Partner

Get to Know Doug

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content


2 vs. 2000

A key metric that many investors use to measure the size of a company is market capitalization, which represents the…

This chart description is for illustrative purposes only and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Please see full disclosures at end of PDF. General description: Four-line chart plotting Treasury yield and spread since 1976. Chart subtitle: The current inversion of the Treasury curve has been aberrational in length and magnitude relative to history. Chart source: Bloomberg, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis as of February 14, 2024 Chart visual description: Left Y-axis labeled “Yield" and ranges from 0% to 18% in 2% increments. Right Y-axis labeled “Spread” and ranges from -300bps to 400bps in 100bps increments. X-axis labeled in YYYY format, from 1976 to 2023. 10-Year Treasury Yield plotted in dark teal line. 2-Year Treasury Yield plotted in light teal line. 2s10s Spread plotted in tan line. Inversion Demarcation (corresponding to right Y-axis) is plotted in light tan dashed line. Chart data description: Please contact us for the full dataset. End chart description. See disclosures at end of document.


If the Treasury Curve Could Talk

While most of Marquette’s research is written in the third person, this edition of our Chart of the Week series…

This chart description is for illustrative purposes only and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Please see full disclosures at end of PDF. General description: Line chart showing down rounds in venture capital-backed companies. Chart subtitle: Over the last two years, there has been a noticeable increase in down rounds for venture-backed companies. Chart source: Source: Cooley GO as of September 30, 2023 Chart visual description: Y-axis labeled “Down Rounds as a % of Total” and ranges from 0% to 30%. X-axis labeled in quarterly increments, from 1Q21 through 3Q23. Down Rounds (% of Total) plotted in dark orange; average plotted in dotted light orange. Chart data description: Average at 9.6%. 1Q21 at 5.7%. 2Q21 at 2.7%. 3Q21 at 2.3%. 4Q21 at 0.4% (trough for period shown). 1Q22 at 3.0%. 2Q22 at 4.1%. 3Q22 at 10.2%. 4Q22 at 14.1%. 1Q23 at 15.5%. 2Q23 at 21.2%. 3Q23 at 26.8%. End chart description. See disclosures at end of document.


Another (Down) Round

Venture-backed companies tend to be nascent and typically deploy investment capital in an effort to drive revenue expansion, often to…

This chart description is for illustrative purposes only and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Please see full disclosures at end of PDF. General description: Combination column and line chart showing index weight and performance for China and India. Chart subtitle: There has been a significant divergence in performance between Chinese and Indian equities over the last few years. Chart source: Bloomberg, eVestment, MSCI as of December 31, 2023. Chart visual description: Left Y-axis labeled “Cumulative Return” and ranges from -25% to +150%. Right Y-axis labeled “MSCI Emerging Markets Weight” and ranges from 0% to 50%. X-axis labeled M/D/YY in six-month increments, from 12/31/15 to 12/31/23. EM Index weights are stacked columns, with China in light blue and India in light green, at the 6/30 increment for each year. China return is plotted in dark blue line and India return in dark green. Chart data description: Please contact us for the full dataset. End chart description. See disclosures at end of document.


A Tale of Two Emerging Markets

While Chinese equities have largely languished in recent time amid robust performance of Indian stocks, it is important to note…


2024 Market Preview Video

This video is a recording of a live webinar held January 25 by Marquette’s research team analyzing 2023 across the…


2024 Market Preview: A 40 Degree Day

A former colleague once described his brother-in-law to me as a “40 degree day.” The puzzled look on my face…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >