Will Excess Reserves Lead to Inflation?

August 24, 2011 | Doug Oest, CAIA, Partner

This week’s chart looks at the amount of excess reserves banks are holding at the Federal Reserve (orange line) along with the corresponding changes to the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet (black line). As of the end of July 2011, banks are holding over $1.6 trillion in excess reserves, which is notably higher than what historical averages would suggest. This has led some market commentators to worry about inflation escalating as banks begin to lend out those assets (note that overall loans and leases issued by commercial banks, as represented by the red line, have fallen since the Financial Crisis of 2008 – 2009).

In the United States, all depository institutions (commercial banks, savings and loans, credit unions, etc.) are required by the Fed to satisfy a reserve requirement (or liquidity ratio): each bank must retain a certain amount of cash that cannot be used for loans to business or consumers. Any reserves held above the required amount are considered “excess reserves”.

Historically, institutions have minimized their excess reserves because it is generally more profitable to issue loans than to hold the cash (the banks can earn higher amounts of interest via loans). When money is lent by banks, it can have what is called a multiplier effect on money supply: because banks only have to hold a small percentage of assets to meet the reserve requirement, they are able to increase the money supply by lending. For instance, with a 10% reserve requirement, $100 could theoretically be turned into $1,000 through the multiplier effect.

As a result of this theory, many market commentators have expressed concern over the current large level of excess reserves held by banks. Based on this macroeconomic theory, even a relatively small decline in excess reserves of $100 billion could theoretically increase the money supply by $1 trillion (assuming a reserve requirement of 10%).

The Fed is confident that inflation is not a near term threat to the economy, and when (if) inflation does become a concern, it has the tools to control the growth of price levels. A large output gap in the U.S. economy, high levels of unemployment, and slow wage growth are the most commonly cited reasons for the expected low levels of future inflation. The Fed also has a few tools to help combat inflation from excess reserves, including selling large amounts of securities from its balance sheet (either outright sales or using reverse repurchase agreements) or increasing the interest rate it pays on excess reserves to incent banks to continue to hold excess reserves. The ability to pay interest on excess reserves is a new tool for the Fed and in its view alters the theory behind the multiplier effect.

The fact remains that the U.S. is in uncharted monetary policy territory, with little historical precedent to rely on. As Fed Vice Chairman Donald Kohn said, “the calibration of our exit from these policies is complicated by a paucity of evidence on how unconventional policies work. We will need to be flexible and adjust as we gain experience”.

Doug Oest, CAIA
Partner

Get to Know Doug

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Stacked column chart showing Weight in S&P 500 Index in 1985, 1995, 2005, 2015, and 2025 for top 10 companies at that time, with companies stacked for each year by weight. From 1985-2015, top 10 weight ranged from 17.6% to 21.1%, but 2025's weight was 40.6%. Company makeup changes over time, with no companies from 1985/1995 categories in 2025. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

05.04.2026

This Too Shall Reconstitute

Rooted in medieval Persian Sufi thought, the adage “this too shall pass” speaks to the fleeting and impermanent nature of…

Three-line chart comparing cumulative returns for MSCI EM Latin America Index, MSCI EAFE Index, and S&P 500 Index, Jan 1, 2026 through April 24, 2026. Dashed line at February 28 demarcates U.S. strikes on Iran. While all three indices dipped after war began, Latin America Index was higher to begin with and remains high. Most recent data point (4/24) for Latin America is 20.36%, EAFE is 5.7%, and S&P 500 is 5.06%. For full dataset, please email marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.27.2026

Let’s Hear It for Latin America

Latin American equity markets have shown remarkable strength in 2026. After a strong start to the year, the MSCI Emerging…

04.23.2026

We’ve Seen This Before

Diversify. Rebalance. Stay invested. Every one of these letters has concluded with that same advice in some shape or form….

Two-line chart showing unemployment rate for All U.S. Workers and Recent College Graduates (Ages 22–27), 12/31/05 to 12/31/25. Up to 2020 period, Recent College Graduates generally had a lower unemployment rate than all U.S. workers category, but since then, the opposite has been true. Lines begin at ~3% to ~5% range in 2005, rose during Global Financial Crisis of '07-'09 to near 10% for All, ~7% for Grads, then both lines declined fairly steadily up to COVID. Peak for both series was 6/30/20, with All at 12.8% and Grads at 13.4%. Most recent data for 12/31/25 is ~4% for All and ~5.5% for Grads. For full dataset, please email marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.20.2026

The Sorrows of Young Workers

Entry-level jobs have traditionally served as the primary bridge between education and stable employment, offering young workers a foothold from…

Combination column and line chart showing Net Duties Received (columns, left-hand axis, ranging $0 to $35 billion) and Effective Tariff Rate (line, right-hand axis, ranging 0 to 12%) monthly, from April 2024 through February 2025. Up to March 2025, both data series held relatively steady, averaging around $7B for net duties received, and 2% for effective tariff rate, but both series have quadrupled since then. Most recent (Feb-26) is $26B and 8%. Please contact us for the full data set at marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.13.2026

Liberation Day: One Year Later

On April 2, 2025, President Donald Trump announced a sweeping set of tariffs on imports into the United States. Dubbed…

Line chart showing commercial & industrial loans as percent of total bank credit since 1980. Peak of line is September 1982 at 38%; since then there has been a steady decrease, with several peaks following global crises, with February 2026 datapoint at 21%. Basel I labeled at 1988, Basel II labeled at 2004, Basel III labeled at 2010. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.06.2026

Regulation Abdication?

The Basel capital framework was created to ensure that banks maintain sufficient capital to absorb losses and reduce the risk…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >