Checking In On Unemployment

October 10, 2012

Since March 2009, the S&P 500 has returned 130% through September. Unemployment rates in the United States have improved as well, though more sluggishly. With the unemployment rate in the headlines, it may be insightful to look under the hood and see how the numbers have changed on a more detailed level. Today’s chart of the week looks at the improvement in unemployment rates on a state by state basis since March of 2009. Changes are normalized by the unemployment rate ending in 2006 to show comparisons across states on a similar basis. The largest decreases in unemployment, or the “best” improvements, are shown in dark green. Mathematically, a state that falls into the dark green category of “less than -20%” means that unemployment since March of 2009 has fallen by at least 20% of the pre-crisis level in 2006. For example, unemployment in Alabama was 9.2% in March of 2009, and is 8.5% as of the most recent reading. This decline of 0.7% is about 20% of Alabama’s 2006 unemployment rate of 3.4%.

Looking at some of the individual states, a few stand out for assorted reasons. Utah, with one of the lowest unemployment rates in the country both pre- and post-crisis, has shown the greatest improvement since 2009 relative to pre-crisis levels. Michigan and Ohio, large rust belt states with some of the nation’s highest unemployment rates leading into the crisis, have also seen large improvements. Michigan currently has one of the higher unemployment rates in the country at 9.4%, but this is down from 12.6% in early 2009.

Housing bubble states Florida and Nevada both saw some of the largest increases in unemployment due to the crisis, with unemployment rates spiking north of 6% in both states. Since then however, Florida’s unemployment rate has experienced a strong improvement, while Nevada’s has continued to deteriorate. Nevada now has the worst unemployment rate in the nation at 12.1%, compared to 8.8% for Florida. States with a large amount of financial sector employees such as Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey are also among the states that have seen the largest declines in employment since 2009.

Other states of note include North Dakota, which with an unemployment rate of 3% is the only state with unemployment below 2006 levels, and Texas, which is in the same category as California on this chart but arrived there in a much different way. Though California had a large increase in unemployment during the crisis (5.6%) and relatively little improvement since then, Texas suffered a more modest deterioration in unemployment (2.3%) with a similarly weak rebound. On an absolute basis, California’s unemployment rate of 10.6% is one of the nation’s worst, while Texas’ rate of 7.1% is below the national average.

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Three-line chart comparing cumulative returns for MSCI EM Latin America Index, MSCI EAFE Index, and S&P 500 Index, Jan 1, 2026 through April 24, 2026. Dashed line at February 28 demarcates U.S. strikes on Iran. While all three indices dipped after war began, Latin America Index was higher to begin with and remains high. Most recent data point (4/24) for Latin America is 20.36%, EAFE is 5.7%, and S&P 500 is 5.06%. For full dataset, please email marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.27.2026

Let’s Hear It for Latin America

Latin American equity markets have shown remarkable strength in 2026. After a strong start to the year, the MSCI Emerging…

04.23.2026

We’ve Seen This Before

Diversify. Rebalance. Stay invested. Every one of these letters has concluded with that same advice in some shape or form….

Two-line chart showing unemployment rate for All U.S. Workers and Recent College Graduates (Ages 22–27), 12/31/05 to 12/31/25. Up to 2020 period, Recent College Graduates generally had a lower unemployment rate than all U.S. workers category, but since then, the opposite has been true. Lines begin at ~3% to ~5% range in 2005, rose during Global Financial Crisis of '07-'09 to near 10% for All, ~7% for Grads, then both lines declined fairly steadily up to COVID. Peak for both series was 6/30/20, with All at 12.8% and Grads at 13.4%. Most recent data for 12/31/25 is ~4% for All and ~5.5% for Grads. For full dataset, please email marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.20.2026

The Sorrows of Young Workers

Entry-level jobs have traditionally served as the primary bridge between education and stable employment, offering young workers a foothold from…

Combination column and line chart showing Net Duties Received (columns, left-hand axis, ranging $0 to $35 billion) and Effective Tariff Rate (line, right-hand axis, ranging 0 to 12%) monthly, from April 2024 through February 2025. Up to March 2025, both data series held relatively steady, averaging around $7B for net duties received, and 2% for effective tariff rate, but both series have quadrupled since then. Most recent (Feb-26) is $26B and 8%. Please contact us for the full data set at marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.13.2026

Liberation Day: One Year Later

On April 2, 2025, President Donald Trump announced a sweeping set of tariffs on imports into the United States. Dubbed…

04.07.2026

Fiduciary Duties in Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives

On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor (DOL) issued its proposed regulation: Fiduciary Duties in Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives….

Line chart showing commercial & industrial loans as percent of total bank credit since 1980. Peak of line is September 1982 at 38%; since then there has been a steady decrease, with several peaks following global crises, with February 2026 datapoint at 21%. Basel I labeled at 1988, Basel II labeled at 2004, Basel III labeled at 2010. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.06.2026

Regulation Abdication?

The Basel capital framework was created to ensure that banks maintain sufficient capital to absorb losses and reduce the risk…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >