What Does the Coronavirus Pandemic Mean for Future Real Estate Returns?

April 01, 2020

This week’s chart examines forward-looking returns for private real estate based on historical spreads to the 10-Year Treasury Yield and the NCREIF-ODCE Index (proxy for core private real estate). Real estate valuations (spread-to-Treasuries) are currently above 300 bps as a result of COVID-19. Spreads of this magnitude have only been seen four times, each of which has been followed by strong 3- and 5-year returns. For example, during the Global Financial Crisis, real estate spreads-to-Treasuries surpassed 300 bps in the fourth quarter of 2009 which were followed by 12.2% and 12.4% returns for the NCREIF-ODCE Index in the subsequent 3 and 5-year periods, respectively.

Though the impacts from COVID-19 have not yet been fully felt in the private real estate market, it is clear that challenges lie ahead, particularly in the sectors that have been hit the hardest. For example, assets with short lease durations and heavier operating business components, such as hospitality (daily), and co-working office (monthly), as well as assets that rely on foot traffic, such as entertainment, food & beverage, and destination retail will be more affected by the pandemic. Further complicating matters, the lack of transaction volume, comparable sales, leases, and loan originations have made it nearly impossible for appraisers to adjust valuations at this point in time.

Beyond the aforementioned troubled sectors, the impacts from COVID-19 will ultimately vary by property type, geography, and risk profile. The following table highlights the potential near-term and long-term impacts of each property sector:

Impacts of Coronavirus Pandemic on Real Estate Property Sectors table

While global growth is being impacted in the near-term, we still expect a recovery to take hold once the disruption fades; we still maintain the view that the recovery is delayed, not derailed. However, the true impact of this on real estate returns will not be known for a while. Although longer-term forward-looking returns appear promising at this point, there is a relatively high degree of uncertainty because the ultimate impact on the aforementioned sectors (which should be the biggest headwind for real estate) will remain unknown until the coronavirus outbreak is contained and the economy begins to function at a normal level again.

Print PDF > What Does the Coronavirus Pandemic Mean for Future Real Estate Returns?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Three-line chart comparing cumulative returns for MSCI EM Latin America Index, MSCI EAFE Index, and S&P 500 Index, Jan 1, 2026 through April 24, 2026. Dashed line at February 28 demarcates U.S. strikes on Iran. While all three indices dipped after war began, Latin America Index was higher to begin with and remains high. Most recent data point (4/24) for Latin America is 20.36%, EAFE is 5.7%, and S&P 500 is 5.06%. For full dataset, please email marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.27.2026

Let’s Hear It for Latin America

Latin American equity markets have shown remarkable strength in 2026. After a strong start to the year, the MSCI Emerging…

04.23.2026

We’ve Seen This Before

Diversify. Rebalance. Stay invested. Every one of these letters has concluded with that same advice in some shape or form….

Two-line chart showing unemployment rate for All U.S. Workers and Recent College Graduates (Ages 22–27), 12/31/05 to 12/31/25. Up to 2020 period, Recent College Graduates generally had a lower unemployment rate than all U.S. workers category, but since then, the opposite has been true. Lines begin at ~3% to ~5% range in 2005, rose during Global Financial Crisis of '07-'09 to near 10% for All, ~7% for Grads, then both lines declined fairly steadily up to COVID. Peak for both series was 6/30/20, with All at 12.8% and Grads at 13.4%. Most recent data for 12/31/25 is ~4% for All and ~5.5% for Grads. For full dataset, please email marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.20.2026

The Sorrows of Young Workers

Entry-level jobs have traditionally served as the primary bridge between education and stable employment, offering young workers a foothold from…

Combination column and line chart showing Net Duties Received (columns, left-hand axis, ranging $0 to $35 billion) and Effective Tariff Rate (line, right-hand axis, ranging 0 to 12%) monthly, from April 2024 through February 2025. Up to March 2025, both data series held relatively steady, averaging around $7B for net duties received, and 2% for effective tariff rate, but both series have quadrupled since then. Most recent (Feb-26) is $26B and 8%. Please contact us for the full data set at marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.13.2026

Liberation Day: One Year Later

On April 2, 2025, President Donald Trump announced a sweeping set of tariffs on imports into the United States. Dubbed…

04.07.2026

Fiduciary Duties in Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives

On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor (DOL) issued its proposed regulation: Fiduciary Duties in Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives….

Line chart showing commercial & industrial loans as percent of total bank credit since 1980. Peak of line is September 1982 at 38%; since then there has been a steady decrease, with several peaks following global crises, with February 2026 datapoint at 21%. Basel I labeled at 1988, Basel II labeled at 2004, Basel III labeled at 2010. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.06.2026

Regulation Abdication?

The Basel capital framework was created to ensure that banks maintain sufficient capital to absorb losses and reduce the risk…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >