Cryptocurrencies Surge Post-Election

December 11, 2024 | Nic Solecki, CBDA, Client Analyst

The cryptocurrency space is making waves again after a robust post-election rally drove bitcoin over $100,000 earlier this month. While it is tempting to attribute recent performance to speculation or momentum, a deeper understanding of the dynamics that fueled this surge may help investors navigate markets in 2025 and beyond. To that point, this week’s chart outlines the year-to-date performance of Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, and the MarketVector Digital Assets 100 Index, a market-cap weighted benchmark comprised of the top 100 cryptocurrencies (excluding stablecoins). The vertical line represents the beginning of the post-election cryptocurrency rally.

During the months leading up to the election, broad cryptocurrency performance appears to have been largely tied to bitcoin. As bitcoin is the most established, recognized, and capitalized digital asset, it follows that its liquidity and capital base would generally define the market. However, recent divergences between bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are less intuitive and can largely be attributed to bitcoin’s position in a space beset by regulatory ambiguity and incongruous guidance. Put simply, this year bitcoin appears to have benefited from increased regulatory clarity and investor confidence. By the end of the second quarter, aggregate assets in the top 12 bitcoin ETFs exceeded $50 billion, with the iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF accounting for nearly 40% of that figure. Additionally, the access and standards afforded by the ETFs increased investor confidence, led to modest institutional acceptance, and expanded bitcoin market dominance. Meanwhile, other cryptocurrencies like XRP have faced headwinds that have weighed on performance. Embroiled in litigation since 2020, XRP was delisted by most U.S. exchanges and, as a result, struggled to perform during most of this year despite increased cryptocurrency adoption. This dynamic is demonstrated by XRP’s losses prior to the U.S. election.

So how did these dynamics ultimately contribute to a broad post-election rally, and how could they be relevant in the future? Challenges faced by XRP and the broader cryptocurrency market have led to criticism from industry stakeholders, particularly following the collapse of FTX, which exacerbated regulatory scrutiny. Cryptocurrency advocates and industry leaders widely viewed the responses from regulators as heavy-handed, raising concerns over potential stifling of innovation. As the 2024 election cycle ramped up, stakeholders within the cryptocurrency space increasingly engaged with policymakers, pushing for clearer regulatory frameworks and a more balanced approach. This heightened engagement coincided with a surge in political spending, reflecting the industry’s efforts to influence the regulatory landscape and mitigate perceived risks. Estimates suggest that bipartisan political spending by the cryptocurrency industry during the 2024 election cycle totaled more than $320 million, outpacing the roughly $275 million spent by Elon Musk and $175 million spent by Charles Koch and affiliates.

While it is unclear how cryptocurrencies may benefit from the incoming administration, the nomination of Paul Atkins, a known digital assets advocate, for SEC Chair indicates a potential shift toward more favorable regulatory policies for the sector. Additionally, the appointment of venture capitalist and cryptocurrency proponent David Sacks as the new administration’s “crypto czar” seems to have renewed industry optimism. These and other developments suggest that the incoming administration could provide a more supportive environment for digital assets.

Print PDF

Nic Solecki, CBDA
Client Analyst

Get to Know Nic

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Stacked column chart showing income return and capital return for various infrastructure sectors. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.29.2026

Balancing Growth and Income in Infrastructure

This week’s chart highlights the varying return profiles across key infrastructure sectors by illustrating the split between income and capital…

Two-line chart showing median and average time in years for global unicorns to exit, 2016 to 2025. The 2025 data point (9.2 years median, 9.7 years average) is the highest point charted. In 2016, the median was 6.1 years and average was 6.0. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.22.2026

The VC Convergence Era

When Benchmark, one of Silicon Valley’s most renowned early-stage venture capital firms, closed $2 billion across two new funds this…

Two-line chart showing Private Construction Spending for Data Centers and Public Construction Spending for Transportation from December 2013 to present in billions of dollars. Data Centers in 2013 were $1.6 billion and Transportation was $28.7 billion. Since 2022, Data Center spending has increased quickly; Transportation has increased overall but relatively steadily. April 30, 2026 data point for Data Centers was 50.7, while Transportation was 49.9. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.15.2026

Centers of Attention

The rapid buildout of artificial intelligence infrastructure is reshaping the U.S. investment landscape. According to recent Census Bureau data, spending…

Line chart comparing Growth of $100 and Average Sharpe Ratio for MVIS BDC Index, Cliffwater Direct Lending Index as averages. Data goes back January 2010 through March 31, 2026. Average Sharpe for MVIS US BDC 0.4, Direct Lending 3.28, Bank Loan 0.79. Current datapoint for BDC is $425 and $479 for Direct Lending. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.08.2026

How to Launder Your Volatility

Hi, James Torgerson here! Volatility can be an unsightly blemish on portfolios and lead to inferior risk-adjusted returns. Private credit…

Column chart showing weight in MSCI Emerging Market Index for Taiwan, South Korea, and China annually since 2006. Taiwan hovered around 11% up to 2021, and has increased since then, with 2026 YTD at 26.5%. South Korea has followed a similar path, averaging about 14% 2006 to 2023; 2024 dropped to 9%, but 2025 was back up to 13.3%, and its weight has jumped to 23.1% YTD. China generally increased up to 2020, peaking at 29.7% of the index, but has since mostly decreased year to year, with 2026 YTD at 19.7%. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.01.2026

The New Face of Emerging Markets

The MSCI Emerging Markets Index has undergone a significant structural transformation in recent years. For much of the past decade,…

05.26.2026

The Best and Worst of Times

The classic novel A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens begins with the line “It was the best of…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >