Did Friday’s Jobs Report Overstate the Labor Market Recovery?

June 10, 2020

On Friday, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics released its employment report for the month of May. To the surprise of many, the economy added 2.5 million jobs during the month, which was a sharp contrast from the projected figure of 8.3 million job losses. Not surprisingly, the unemployment rate dropped from April’s 14.7% figure to 13.3% for May; economists had predicted that May’s unemployment rate would be 19.5%. These unexpected data points have further fueled the equity market rally with the S&P 500 returning 2.6% on Friday when the report was released, and it has continued its upward trajectory into this week as well. Furthermore, Treasury yields have risen based on optimism about economies re-opening and the presumption that the worst is behind us from an economic bottoming perspective. Markets are forward-looking and appear to be pricing in further recovery as 2020 progresses. The stimulus policies and limited re-openings seem to have had an early effect and the data may suggest that the damage was not as deep as expected. However, despite the positive sentiment about the jobs report, there is some concern that a classification anomaly for job losses may have inflated Friday’s numbers.

More specifically, the report had a misclassification issue where employees who were temporarily laid-off were considered employed. If corrected, the unemployment rate should be 3% higher. Additionally, the data collection for the report was through the first week of May and further job losses and lay-offs for the remainder of the month were not addressed.

Compared to the trends from March and April, the reported figures are moving in the right direction, even though this classification issue makes the numbers from Friday appear a bit more optimistic than reality. Ultimately, the unemployment rate is the highest since the Great Recession and recovered payrolls are only about 10% of those that were wiped out during the pandemic. So while the data shows that the market is heading in the right direction, it is too early to make conclusive decisions about the state of recovery until we see a more sustained pattern of job creation and economic growth.

Print PDF > Did Friday’s Jobs Report Overstate the Labor Market Recovery?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Combination column and line chart showing Net Duties Received (columns, left-hand axis, ranging $0 to $35 billion) and Effective Tariff Rate (line, right-hand axis, ranging 0 to 12%) monthly, from April 2024 through February 2025. Up to March 2025, both data series held relatively steady, averaging around $7B for net duties received, and 2% for effective tariff rate, but both series have quadrupled since then. Most recent (Feb-26) is $26B and 8%. Please contact us for the full data set at marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.13.2026

Liberation Day: One Year Later

On April 2, 2025, President Donald Trump announced a sweeping set of tariffs on imports into the United States. Dubbed…

Line chart showing commercial & industrial loans as percent of total bank credit since 1980. Peak of line is September 1982 at 38%; since then there has been a steady decrease, with several peaks following global crises, with February 2026 datapoint at 21%. Basel I labeled at 1988, Basel II labeled at 2004, Basel III labeled at 2010. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

04.06.2026

Regulation Abdication?

The Basel capital framework was created to ensure that banks maintain sufficient capital to absorb losses and reduce the risk…

Stacked column chart comparing contribution to total value creation broken out by revenue growth, margin expansion, and multiple expansion for private equity managers, by exit year, 2017 to 2024. 2017 column 45% revenue growth, 26% margin expansion, 29% multiple expansion. 2018 column 56% revenue growth, 4% margin expansion, 40% multiple expansion. 2019 column 43% revenue growth, 10% margin expansion, 47% multiple expansion. 2020 column 42% revenue growth, 19% margin expansion, 39% multiple expansion. 2021 column 46% revenue growth, 13% margin expansion, 42% multiple expansion. 2022 column 53% revenue growth, 20% margin expansion, 27% multiple expansion. 2023 column 64% revenue growth, 19% margin expansion, 17% multiple expansion. 2024 column 71% revenue growth, 12% margin expansion, 17% multiple expansion.

03.30.2026

Pulling the Right Value Creation Levers

In the period between 2009 and 2022, private equity managers thrived amid an environment of low interest rates and rising…

Line chart comparing Brent Crude Futures, WTI Futures, and European Gas Futures from December 2023 to present. Lefthand y-axis labeled Price per Barrel and ranges $0 to $120, corresponding to Brent Crude and WTI data series. Righthand y-axis labeled Price per megawatt Hour and ranges €0 to €70, corresponding to Euro-pean Gas Futures. All three series have spiked in recent weeks, with most recent data as of March 23, 2026 at 100.49 for Brent Crude, 88.72 for WTI, and 54.69 for European gas. Dashed line overlay at February 28 highlighting strikes on Iran.

03.23.2026

Pain at the Pump

Global energy costs have risen sharply this month due to a convergence of geopolitical shocks, as critical infrastructure and transport…

Column chart showing months from first to final close for North American Closed-End Real Estate Funds with average (~10.6 months) overlaid using dotted line. Up to 2020, funds generally stayed below 10 months; in the years since, it is well over, with 2025 at 25 months.

03.16.2026

Closing Time

This week’s chart illustrates a clear structural shift in the fundraising dynamics of North American closed-end real estate funds over…

03.09.2026

Buy High, Sell Low?

Warren Buffett once implored investors to “be greedy when others are fearful,” and this sage advice is certainly applicable to…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >