Has the Drop in Oil Prices Been a Drag on the U.S. Economy?

April 23, 2015 | Mike Spychalski, CAIA, Vice President

Over the past few quarters, there has been much discussion about how the recent plunge in oil prices would impact the U.S. economy. While there were expectations of both positive and negative effects associated with lower oil prices, the general consensus amongst economists was that this would have a net positive impact on the U.S. economy. Cuts in capital expenditures from U.S. oil producers (which have been a significant contributor to GDP growth for the past several years) were expected to be a drag on economic growth. At the same time, lower energy costs for consumers were expected to result in increased disposable income and thus increased consumer spending, which would boost economic growth. Given that the U.S. is a net importer of oil, the benefit to consumers was expected to more than offset the decrease in capital spending from producers, resulting in a net positive impact.

Since low oil prices have persisted for several months now, we are starting to get an indication of the impact on the economy, and at this point it does not appear to be nearly as positive as expected. It appears as if the economic drag from decreased capital expenditures from oil producers has been greater than the benefit from lower oil prices. While the drop in capital expenditures from oil producers has more or less been in line with expectations, the increase in disposable income has not translated to the increase in consumer spending that was anticipated. Consumers appear to be saving, rather than spending, this increased disposable income. As the chart illustrates, from June 2014, when oil peaked at approximately $115 per barrel, to February 2015 (the most recent date data is available for), annualized household spending on energy has decreased from approximately $645 billion to approximately $533 billion, representing a decrease of approximately $112 billion. Over the same time frame, annualized household saving has increased from approximately $658 billion to $768 billion, an increase of approximately $110 billion.

Thus far, the negative consequences from lower oil prices (reduced capital spending and job cuts from the energy sector) have been a drag on the U.S. economy, while the benefits from lower oil prices (increased consumer spending) have not yet had the positive impact that was expected. This phenomenon may help to explain some of the disappointing economic data observed during the first quarter. Consumers are often slow to adjust spending habits, and that may well be the case here, meaning that consumer spending will likely be one of the most influential economic data points in the coming months.

Mike Spychalski, CAIA
Vice President

Get to Know Mike

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

08.10.2026

The Yen is Wayward… but Investors Carry On

After reaching nearly ¥164 per dollar, its weakest level in roughly four decades, the yen had become a source of…

Combined column and line chart showing expected hikes/cuts and policy rate as of 12/31/2025 through 7/31/2025 as well as the actual policy rate for upcoming Fed meetings, 12/31/2025 through 12/9/2026. As market expectations have changed in 2026, investors' original outlook for two rate cuts were priced out in March and eventually switched to two rate hikes. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

08.03.2026

Hit the One in the Middle, Mr. Chairman!

In the cinematic masterpiece Rocky IV, Rocky gets dazed by his opponent, Captain Ivan Drago, and complains that he sees…

Column chart showing redemption volume for business development companies (PDCs) in billions of dollars by quarter, 1Q 2022 to 2Q 2026. Filled redemptions are shown in solid orange, but 1Q and 2Q 2026 also include stacked lighter orange for Unmet Redemptions data (-$6.5B and -$9.7B, respectively). Up to the second half of 2025, volume hovered at less than -$2B, but has since increased. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

07.27.2026

Liquidity Isn’t Free

The rapid growth of non-traded business development companies (BDCs), which are investment vehicles that pool investor capital to make loans…

07.24.2026

2026 Halftime Market Insights

This video is a recording of a live webinar held July 23 by Marquette’s research team analyzing the first half…

07.22.2026

Under the Radar for the Second Half

The usual midyear version of these letters has touched on year-to-date performance as well as the most influential macroeconomic and…

Three-line chart showing cumulative returns for the KOSPI Index, SK Hynix, and SK Hynix Daily 2x Leveraged ETF from June 30, 2025 to June 30, 2026. While the KOSPI Index is at 137% cumulative, SK Hynix is at 671% and the ETF is at 948%, highlighting the growing role of ETFs. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

07.20.2026

Wagging the Dog

Our most recent Chart of the Week publication discussed how the AI investment opportunity has expanded beyond…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >