Brains Over Brawn?

January 05, 2026 | Evan Frazier, CFA, CAIA, Senior Research Analyst

Line chart showing cumulative total return and price-to-earnings multiple for Bloomberg AI Index and Bloomberg Robotics Index.

The development of artificial intelligence is advancing along two largely distinct paths. The first centers on generative AI powered by large language models, with the long-term objective of creating systems that can reason across domains at levels superior to those of human beings. The second focuses on embodied intelligence (i.e., robotics). In this space, the objective is not abstract reasoning but rather the deployment of capable machines that can operate effectively in the physical world. Over the last five years, capital and attention have overwhelmingly gravitated toward companies involved in generative AI, with the Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index up a staggering 276% in that time. Robotics, by comparison, has been widely viewed as a longer-dated theme, with the Bloomberg Robotics Index up only 77% over that same period (even less than the S&P 500 Index return of 134%). These dynamics can be observed in this week’s chart.

Going forward, there are reasons to believe that this performance trend may shift in the years ahead. For instance, human-level general intelligence could be far more distant than markets currently assume, and language models may not prove sufficient to reach it. At the same time, practical robots (e.g., warehouse automation, humanoid assistants, etc.) appear closer to commercial reality than previously believed, particularly in aging societies facing persistent labor shortages. One possible accelerant for robotics companies in the years ahead is the use of advanced simulation. By training in virtual environments, robots can acquire motor skills and coordination far more rapidly than through physical trial and error alone, potentially pulling forward adoption timelines relative to current investor expectations. Importantly, transformative impact does not require robots to achieve artificial general intelligence but rather functional capability (i.e., the ability to move objects, operate safely, and sustain useful work with sufficient battery life). Commercial momentum in robotics is already building. In 2024, for example, Agility Robotics opened a manufacturing facility in Oregon with capacity to produce up to 10,000 humanoid units annually, and Amazon has now begun testing Agility’s robots in its warehouses. Additionally, companies like Tesla are showcasing humanoid prototypes performing increasingly fluid physical tasks, and BYD has signaled interest in future household robotics. While price points remain prohibitive for mass adoption today, several structural forces are converging to improve the economics of robotics. Manufacturing costs are declining as scaling drives down prices for components like sensors and actuators, while improvements in AI models are enhancing robotic perception and control. Taken in tandem with the fact that generative AI leaders are currently investing heavily in costly, power-hungry data centers, it is fair to say that a once slower-moving, less glamorous segment of the AI ecosystem may now benefit from relative capital efficiency.

Despite these developments, markets continue to assign a significant valuation premium to generative AI over robotics, which can also be observed in the chart above. Factor analysis helps explain part of the gap, as AI-heavy indexes skew toward momentum and growth while robotics-oriented benchmarks exhibit greater exposure to value, quality, and, in some cases, even dividend income. Further, the generative AI complex is dominated by large technology platforms including Alphabet, Microsoft, and NVIDIA, whereas robotics companies tend to be more industrial in nature (e.g., automation specialists, automakers, and emerging consumer-robotics firms). This valuation disconnect suggests that investors may be overemphasizing long-term breakthroughs in cognition while underappreciating near-term progress in physical automation, especially as physical robots transition from research environments into factories, homes, and hospitals. Indeed, while much of today’s excitement centers on artificial brains, it may ultimately be robotic brawn that drives the next leg of growth within the technology sector.

Print PDF

Evan Frazier, CFA, CAIA
Senior Research Analyst

Get to Know Evan

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Bar chart comparing October and year-to-date 2026 returns for Korea, Taiwan, Brazil, India, China, and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. October returns are below zero for most markets, while year-to-date returns range from negative to positive. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

11.02.2026

The Haunting of Emerging Markets

Emerging markets faced a challenging October, with the space declining by around 8.3% amid renewed concerns over the sustainability of…

Stacked bar chart showing U.S. private equity deal value by deal size from Q1 2022 through Q2 2026. The y-axis shows percentage of total deal value from 0% to 100%, and the x-axis shows quarters by year. Stacked bar chart showing the percentage of U.S. private equity deal count by deal size from Q1 2022 through Q2 2026. The y-axis ranges from 0% to 100%, and the x-axis shows quarters by year. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

10.26.2026

Smaller Deals, Larger Appeal

Private equity activity is increasingly shifting toward smaller transactions, with total deal value for transactions of $100 million or less…

10.08.2026

3Q 2026 Market Insights

This video is a recording of a live webinar held October 22 by Marquette’s research team analyzing the third quarter…

10.22.2026

Will Higher Rates Cramp the Markets?

Anyone who has run a marathon knows the last six miles are brutal — no matter how well the first…

Line chart comparing S&P 500 Index cumulative returns for midterm and non-midterm election years since 1980. The x-axis shows October through December, and the y-axis shows S&P 500 Index cumulative return, ranging from -1% to 8%. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

10.19.2026

Divided We Rise?

Since 1980, the S&P 500 Index has generally performed well in the weeks surrounding U.S. midterm elections. Specifically, the index…

Chart #1 - Line chart showing PJM summer peak load estimates in gigawatts (GW) from 2015 to 2045. The chart compares historical peak load, current capacity, and forecasts from 2024, 2025, and 2026, showing projected demand rising above current capacity over time. Chart #2 - Stacked bar chart showing U.S. power demand in terawatt-hours (TWh) for 2025 and estimated demand in 2030. The chart compares data center and non-data center demand, showing total power demand increasing over the period.

10.12.2026

The Power Demand Supercycle

This week’s chart highlights the accelerating growth of electricity demand in the U.S., which has been driven primarily by the…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >