What’s Your Haven? | Who is the “Godfather” of the Bond Market?

April 17, 2025 | Frank Valle, CFA, CAIA, Associate Director of Fixed Income

No, you are not seeing double. This very special edition of our chart of the week series comes with an added bonus chart with the goal of highlighting key dynamics within fixed income markets that have been top of mind for investors in recent weeks. Read on and enjoy two charts for the price of one!

 

What’s Your Haven?

Fixed income has historically provided three benefits to investors: Income, diversification, and liquidity. U.S. Treasuries are a pure form of diversification given their limited risk with the 10-year Treasury serving as a bellwether, and these securities are viewed by many as safe havens during periods of market stress. Historically, Treasuries and equities have tended to exhibit low to negative correlations. However, much like returns and volatility, correlations are time-varying. For instance, the historical relationship between stocks and bonds broke down in the aftermath of the COVID-19 crisis, when accommodative monetary policy led to higher levels of inflation and the two asset classes moved in tandem. The same pattern took hold over the last few weeks amidst tariff-induced market volatility, with correlations between stocks and Treasuries increasing and hampering traditional diversification benefits. With Treasury rates recently trading like risk assets, there are other safe haven assets to which investors have turned for insulation against volatility.

Gold is often referred to as a safe haven asset given its status as a precious metal that is viewed as a store of value and a hedge against inflation. Over the last few years, gold has offered favorable diversification relative to risk assets with inflation running hot. It also tends to do well when fears are high. To that point, with the S&P 500 Index down more than 8% on a year-to-date basis, spot gold prices have risen from $2,625/oz to $3,312/oz.¹ All of this being said, gold is not necessarily a good investment as it does not provide cash flows and its price movements are largely driven by speculation. Additionally, the correlation of gold to equities fluctuates over time from somewhat positive to somewhat negative, with material variations over longer investment horizons.

Some currencies are also viewed as safe haven assets, with the classic example being the yen given Japan’s stable political system and ample liquidity. The yen has rallied with stocks down this year, moving from ¥157.20/$ to ¥142.66/$. Diversification benefits from the yen have historically been better than those provided by gold, but they have also waned somewhat in recent years. Currencies also suffer from some of the same issues as gold, including a lack of cash flows and price speculation. As such, most currencies are generally best used as tactical hedges as opposed to long-term portfolio constituents.

Diversification is a critical component of portfolio construction and while Treasuries have historically served as safe havens during market volatility, other assets have offered more compelling diversification benefits in recent weeks. However, the viability of these assets (i.e., gold and currencies) as outright replacements for Treasuries in portfolios is questionable given the points made above.

¹ Bloomberg as of April 16, 2025

 

Who is the “Godfather” of the Bond Market?

Current global trade tensions beg the question: Can foreign holders of U.S. debt manipulate the Treasury market? Indeed, some have speculated that China sold Treasuries to put upward pressure on yields last week to retaliate against the U.S. for its new tariffs (i.e., causing the U.S. to borrow at higher rates). This action, however, would likely be painful for China as well. If news of significant Treasury sales by China were to circulate, yields would likely spike, and the value of its remaining holdings would fall. The U.S. also has tools to combat such a move, including quantitative easing (i.e., bond purchases) designed to return yields to normal levels. Ultimately, a retaliatory Treasury sale would be a huge risk to China, not to mention the fact that China’s holdings tend to be of a shorter nature and recent pressure has mostly been on the long end of the curve (which sold off by around 50 basis points last week). Might another country be responsible for this movement?

While some Japanese politicians have lobbied for using its country’s Treasury holdings as a tool in trade negotiations, the ruling party has repeatedly emphasized that Japan should not sell its Treasuries to rile the United States. So, while Japan has indeed been a notable seller of U.S. Treasuries in recent weeks, these sales have likely been influenced by other factors. For instance, Japanese life insurers are major holders of long-dated U.S. Treasuries, and these entities could be rotating out of Treasuries given a cautious stance on U.S. policy. Another potential reason for recent sales is Japanese pension plans rotating into European bonds.

In summary, technical signals from non-U.S. investors can certainly influence the Treasury market, but it is unlikely that these players could engage in outright market manipulation. At the end of the day, the Federal Reserve can pull strings to combat Treasury-related turmoil and remains the godfather of the bond market.

Print PDF > What’s Your Haven? Print PDF > Who is the “Godfather” of the Bond Market?

Frank Valle, CFA, CAIA
Associate Director of Fixed Income

Get to Know Frank

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Line chart showing average option-adjusted spreads (OAS), in basis points, on Bloomberg CCC U.S. High Yield and Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield bonds from December 2025 through October 2026. CCC-rated high yield spreads increased from approximately 600 bps to 1,100 bps, reaching their highest levels in nearly four years, while broader U.S. corporate high yield spreads remained relatively stable, increasing from approximately 260 bps to 330 bps. Source: Bloomberg as of November 6, 2026. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

11.09.2026

C’s Get Degrees (of Pain)

The U.S. distressed debt market is showing increasingly pronounced signs of stress. As of this writing, option-adjusted spreads on CCC-rated…

Bar chart comparing October and year-to-date 2026 returns for Korea, Taiwan, Brazil, India, China, and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. October returns are below zero for most markets, while year-to-date returns range from negative to positive. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

11.02.2026

The Haunting of Emerging Markets

Emerging markets faced a challenging October, with the space declining by around 8.3% amid renewed concerns over the sustainability of…

Stacked bar chart showing U.S. private equity deal value by deal size from Q1 2022 through Q2 2026. The y-axis shows percentage of total deal value from 0% to 100%, and the x-axis shows quarters by year. Stacked bar chart showing the percentage of U.S. private equity deal count by deal size from Q1 2022 through Q2 2026. The y-axis ranges from 0% to 100%, and the x-axis shows quarters by year. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

10.26.2026

Smaller Deals, Larger Appeal

Private equity activity is increasingly shifting toward smaller transactions, with total deal value for transactions of $100 million or less…

10.08.2026

3Q 2026 Market Insights

This video is a recording of a live webinar held October 22 by Marquette’s research team analyzing the third quarter…

10.22.2026

Will Higher Rates Cramp the Markets?

Anyone who has run a marathon knows the last six miles are brutal — no matter how well the first…

Line chart comparing S&P 500 Index cumulative returns for midterm and non-midterm election years since 1980. The x-axis shows October through December, and the y-axis shows S&P 500 Index cumulative return, ranging from -1% to 8%. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

10.19.2026

Divided We Rise?

Since 1980, the S&P 500 Index has generally performed well in the weeks surrounding U.S. midterm elections. Specifically, the index…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >