What’s Your Haven? | Who is the “Godfather” of the Bond Market?

April 17, 2025 | Frank Valle, CFA, CAIA, Associate Director of Fixed Income

No, you are not seeing double. This very special edition of our chart of the week series comes with an added bonus chart with the goal of highlighting key dynamics within fixed income markets that have been top of mind for investors in recent weeks. Read on and enjoy two charts for the price of one!

 

What’s Your Haven?

Fixed income has historically provided three benefits to investors: Income, diversification, and liquidity. U.S. Treasuries are a pure form of diversification given their limited risk with the 10-year Treasury serving as a bellwether, and these securities are viewed by many as safe havens during periods of market stress. Historically, Treasuries and equities have tended to exhibit low to negative correlations. However, much like returns and volatility, correlations are time-varying. For instance, the historical relationship between stocks and bonds broke down in the aftermath of the COVID-19 crisis, when accommodative monetary policy led to higher levels of inflation and the two asset classes moved in tandem. The same pattern took hold over the last few weeks amidst tariff-induced market volatility, with correlations between stocks and Treasuries increasing and hampering traditional diversification benefits. With Treasury rates recently trading like risk assets, there are other safe haven assets to which investors have turned for insulation against volatility.

Gold is often referred to as a safe haven asset given its status as a precious metal that is viewed as a store of value and a hedge against inflation. Over the last few years, gold has offered favorable diversification relative to risk assets with inflation running hot. It also tends to do well when fears are high. To that point, with the S&P 500 Index down more than 8% on a year-to-date basis, spot gold prices have risen from $2,625/oz to $3,312/oz.¹ All of this being said, gold is not necessarily a good investment as it does not provide cash flows and its price movements are largely driven by speculation. Additionally, the correlation of gold to equities fluctuates over time from somewhat positive to somewhat negative, with material variations over longer investment horizons.

Some currencies are also viewed as safe haven assets, with the classic example being the yen given Japan’s stable political system and ample liquidity. The yen has rallied with stocks down this year, moving from ¥157.20/$ to ¥142.66/$. Diversification benefits from the yen have historically been better than those provided by gold, but they have also waned somewhat in recent years. Currencies also suffer from some of the same issues as gold, including a lack of cash flows and price speculation. As such, most currencies are generally best used as tactical hedges as opposed to long-term portfolio constituents.

Diversification is a critical component of portfolio construction and while Treasuries have historically served as safe havens during market volatility, other assets have offered more compelling diversification benefits in recent weeks. However, the viability of these assets (i.e., gold and currencies) as outright replacements for Treasuries in portfolios is questionable given the points made above.

¹ Bloomberg as of April 16, 2025

 

Who is the “Godfather” of the Bond Market?

Current global trade tensions beg the question: Can foreign holders of U.S. debt manipulate the Treasury market? Indeed, some have speculated that China sold Treasuries to put upward pressure on yields last week to retaliate against the U.S. for its new tariffs (i.e., causing the U.S. to borrow at higher rates). This action, however, would likely be painful for China as well. If news of significant Treasury sales by China were to circulate, yields would likely spike, and the value of its remaining holdings would fall. The U.S. also has tools to combat such a move, including quantitative easing (i.e., bond purchases) designed to return yields to normal levels. Ultimately, a retaliatory Treasury sale would be a huge risk to China, not to mention the fact that China’s holdings tend to be of a shorter nature and recent pressure has mostly been on the long end of the curve (which sold off by around 50 basis points last week). Might another country be responsible for this movement?

While some Japanese politicians have lobbied for using its country’s Treasury holdings as a tool in trade negotiations, the ruling party has repeatedly emphasized that Japan should not sell its Treasuries to rile the United States. So, while Japan has indeed been a notable seller of U.S. Treasuries in recent weeks, these sales have likely been influenced by other factors. For instance, Japanese life insurers are major holders of long-dated U.S. Treasuries, and these entities could be rotating out of Treasuries given a cautious stance on U.S. policy. Another potential reason for recent sales is Japanese pension plans rotating into European bonds.

In summary, technical signals from non-U.S. investors can certainly influence the Treasury market, but it is unlikely that these players could engage in outright market manipulation. At the end of the day, the Federal Reserve can pull strings to combat Treasury-related turmoil and remains the godfather of the bond market.

Print PDF > What’s Your Haven? Print PDF > Who is the “Godfather” of the Bond Market?

Frank Valle, CFA, CAIA
Associate Director of Fixed Income

Get to Know Frank

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

07.07.2026

2026 Halftime Market Insights Webinar

JULY 23 — 1:00pm CT Please join Marquette’s research team for our 2026 Halftime Market Insights Webinar…

Column chart showing share of private equity exit value by type in billions across acquisition, buyout, public listing, and continuation vehicles annually, 2016 to 2026 YTD. Since 2019, continuation vehicles have grown in share, with 2025 at their highest level of $98b. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

07.06.2026

To CV or Not to CV?

Since traditional exit routes have remained constrained in recent years due to higher interest rates, valuation gaps, and a subdued…

Stacked column chart showing income return and capital return for various infrastructure sectors. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.29.2026

Balancing Growth and Income in Infrastructure

This week’s chart highlights the varying return profiles across key infrastructure sectors by illustrating the split between income and capital…

Two-line chart showing median and average time in years for global unicorns to exit, 2016 to 2025. The 2025 data point (9.2 years median, 9.7 years average) is the highest point charted. In 2016, the median was 6.1 years and average was 6.0. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.22.2026

The VC Convergence Era

When Benchmark, one of Silicon Valley’s most renowned early-stage venture capital firms, closed $2 billion across two new funds this…

Two-line chart showing Private Construction Spending for Data Centers and Public Construction Spending for Transportation from December 2013 to present in billions of dollars. Data Centers in 2013 were $1.6 billion and Transportation was $28.7 billion. Since 2022, Data Center spending has increased quickly; Transportation has increased overall but relatively steadily. April 30, 2026 data point for Data Centers was 50.7, while Transportation was 49.9. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.15.2026

Centers of Attention

The rapid buildout of artificial intelligence infrastructure is reshaping the U.S. investment landscape. According to recent Census Bureau data, spending…

Line chart comparing Growth of $100 and Average Sharpe Ratio for MVIS BDC Index, Cliffwater Direct Lending Index as averages. Data goes back January 2010 through March 31, 2026. Average Sharpe for MVIS US BDC 0.4, Direct Lending 3.28, Bank Loan 0.79. Current datapoint for BDC is $425 and $479 for Direct Lending. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

06.08.2026

How to Launder Your Volatility

Hi, James Torgerson here! Volatility can be an unsightly blemish on portfolios and lead to inferior risk-adjusted returns. Private credit…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >