A New Tariff in Town?

October 25, 2024

During his presidential term, Donald Trump increased tariffs on Chinese imports to address unfair trade practices including intellectual property theft. Specifically, using Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, the Trump administration imposed an initial 25% tariff on certain Chinese imports in 2018 that triggered a trade war that persists to this day. After this initial levy, Chinese imports fell by 17% on a year-over-year basis in 2019 and an additional 4% in 2020. That said, imports from China returned to pre-trade war levels in 2021 and 2022. There are a few reasons for this trend. First, in 2019, Trump administration officials feared trade restrictions would ruin the holiday season for American consumers and delayed the enactment of tariffs on certain holiday gift favorites including toys, video game consoles, smartphones, laptops, and computer monitors. Simultaneously, the COVID-19 pandemic shifted consumer preferences away from services and toward goods, resulting in increased demand for Chinese imports despite the tariffs. Additionally, from 2019 to 2022, Chinese imports unaffected by the Section 301 tariffs increased by nearly 50%, offsetting the decline in taxed imports. These factors resulted in an unexpected net increase in overall Chinese imports into the United States over that period.

While certain tariffs have expired, the Biden administration has reinforced several Trump-era trade policies. Earlier this year, for instance, tariffs were increased on goods like steel and aluminum, electric vehicles, battery parts, solar cells, ship-to-shore cranes, syringes, and needles. Given the upcoming U.S. presidential election, it is interesting to note that both major political parties seem to agree that China’s trade practices warrant a continuation of tariffs. To that point, semiconductor tariffs will likely increase from 25% to 50% over the next year. Additionally, in two years, tariffs on lithium-ion non-EV batteries will likely increase from 7.5% to 25%, and those on graphite permanent magnets will likely increase from 0% to 25%. Since the effect of these future tariffs is ultimately unknown, investors should maintain a diversified portfolio to mitigate the fallout from a potential escalation in the current trade war between the U.S. and China.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Combination stacked column and line chart comparing EMD fund flows (columns) and index cumulative returns (lines), June 2024 to present. Indices used: JPM EMBI GD Index and JPM GBI EM GD Index. Since May 2025, Monthly Flows have been positive, with the exception of March 2026. Most recent datapoint: July 31, 2026 Hard Currency Flows $1.2B, Local Currency $1.6B, JPM EMBI GD Index at 21.2%, JPM GBI EM GD Index at 23.1%. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

09.08.2026

EMD’s Second Chance?

Over the last several years, emerging market debt (EMD) has faced several headwinds, with rising yields across other fixed income…

Combination stacked column and line chart showing U.S. Buyout (private equity) Net Asset Value holding periods, 2011 to 2025. Column categories include holding periods

08.31.2026

Zombie, Inc.

Private equity has always had a few portfolio companies that refused to leave the party. Today, however, the industry appears…

Five-line chart comparing yield on 30-year debt instrument for the United States, United Kingdon, France, Germany, and Japan, December 2021 to August 21, 2026. First data point in order listed previously: 1.9%, 1.1%, 0.9%, 0.2%, 0.7%. Most recent: 5.3%, 5.8%, 4.9%, 3.8%, 4.1%. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

08.24.2026

Long Weakened

The global bond market is facing renewed pressure as investors demand higher yields to hold long-dated government debt, pushing borrowing…

Column chart showing total deal size for 14 non-financial corporate bond deals of $20B or more since the start of 2025. Out of 14, only three were unrelated to AI or hyperscalers. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

08.17.2026

Supersize Me!

As a college football player struggling to put on mass, the “supersizing” deal at McDonald’s was hard to beat. For…

08.10.2026

The Yen is Wayward… but Investors Carry On

After reaching nearly ¥164 per dollar, its weakest level in roughly four decades, the yen had become a source of…

Combined column and line chart showing expected hikes/cuts and policy rate as of 12/31/2025 through 7/31/2025 as well as the actual policy rate for upcoming Fed meetings, 12/31/2025 through 12/9/2026. As market expectations have changed in 2026, investors' original outlook for two rate cuts were priced out in March and eventually switched to two rate hikes. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

08.03.2026

Hit the One in the Middle, Mr. Chairman!

In the cinematic masterpiece Rocky IV, Rocky gets dazed by his opponent, Captain Ivan Drago, and complains that he sees…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >