Know Your Volatility

July 15, 2025 | Nic Solecki, CBDA, Research Analyst

Column chart comparing observed annual volatility for S&P 500 stocks, Russell 2000 stocks, Core stocks with volatility greater or equal to Bitcoin, and Bitcoin over various periods.

Fiduciaries, trustees, and institutional investors may be understandably puzzled by recent developments and shifts in tone from U.S. regulators and policymakers regarding digital assets. For those not following the space closely, in recent months:

  • The Department of Labor (DOL) rescinded its 2022 “extreme care” guidance and reaffirmed a neutral stance — emphasizing fiduciary process over product exclusion.2
  • Banking regulators softened their posture by withdrawing supervisory guidance, signaling a shift from structural resistance to conditional tolerance and constructive engagement.3,4,5
  • The SEC approved a diversified, multi-asset crypto ETF — marking a pivotal moment in U.S. regulatory acceptance and product offerings.6
  • At the federal legislative level, bipartisan efforts to codify dollar-backed stablecoins suggest the possibility of a broader strategy to reinforce U.S. monetary leadership in both digital finance and capital markets.7,8
  • At the state level, Texas and New Hampshire have enacted legislation to establish digital asset reserve funds or authorize their state treasurers to invest in digital assets.9

These developments may seem at odds with the long-standing perception that digital assets — particularly Bitcoin — are categorically too volatile and immature for institutional portfolios. While the immaturity label is fair and simply a function of time, the volatility story — while true on an absolute basis — loses a bit of its bite when compared to individual stocks.

The chart above illustrates this point using securities from the S&P 500 (blue) and Russell 2000 (light blue) — benchmarks that underpin equity exposures across many investment portfolios. Since 2020, more than 1,000 individual stocks (purple) included in core S&P 500 and Russell 2000 indices have, on average, exhibited annualized volatility comparable to or exceeding that of Bitcoin — including well-known names such as Tesla, Nvidia, Carvana, Hims & Hers, and JPMorgan Chase.¹ While this is not to suggest Bitcoin’s price should be expected to follow the same price movements of a traditional stock, it does start to address the long-held stereotype of its outsized volatility across market cycles. That said, the relative immaturity of Bitcoin (and all digital assets for that matter) should be considered when assessing the relative volatility versus stocks.

Ultimately, the intent here is not to advocate adoption — this is not an endorsement of digital assets. Rather, the goal is to better understand that recent regulatory, policy, and institutional shifts appear to reflect a more empirically grounded understanding of risk.

It is important to underscore that many of these developments remain provisional. Absent more binding legislation, recent guidance and positions could shift under future administrations. Accordingly, Marquette maintains a cautious approach to digital assets. Fiduciary prudence requires a holistic, portfolio-based risk assessment that considers formal legislation and regulatory frameworks, governance standards, plan-specific objectives, and long-term suitability. Fiduciaries require a durable foundation for evaluating potential portfolio inclusion of asset classes. Given the inherent uncertainty of a transient regulatory landscape — and the varied facts and circumstances across retirement plans — a measured, wait-and-see approach seems reasonable.

1 Bloomberg 260-day volatility as of May 30, 2025; 260-day historical volatility for all assets, respectively.
2 U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration. Compliance Assistance Release No. 2025-01: 401(k) Plan Investments in “Cryptocurrencies”. May 28, 2025.
3 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Federal Reserve Board Announces Withdrawal of Guidance for Banks Related to Crypto-Asset and Dollar Token Activities. Press release, April 24, 2025.
4 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. FDIC Clarifies Process for Banks to Engage in Crypto-Related Activities. Press release, March 28, 2025.
5 Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. OCC Clarifies Bank Authority to Engage in Crypto-Asset Custody and Execution Services. Interpretive Letter #1184, May 7, 2025.
6 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto, to Amend NYSE Arca Rule 8.500-E (Trust Units) and to List and Trade Shares of the Grayscale Digital Large Cap Fund LLC under Amended NYSE Arca Rule 8.500-E (Trust Units). Release No. 34-103364, July 1, 2025.
7 Reuters. U.S. Senate Passes Stablecoin Bill in Milestone for Crypto Industry. June 17, 2025.
8 Bloomberg Government. Texas Gov. Abbott Signs Bill to Create State Bitcoin Reserve. July 1, 2025.
9 New Hampshire General Court. House Bill 302: An Act Relative to Enabling the State Treasury to Invest in Precious Metals and DigitalAssets. Signed May 6, 2025. Effective May 7, 2025.

Print PDF

Nic Solecki, CBDA
Research Analyst

Get to Know Nic

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Chart #1 - Line chart showing PJM summer peak load estimates in gigawatts (GW) from 2015 to 2045. The chart compares historical peak load, current capacity, and forecasts from 2024, 2025, and 2026, showing projected demand rising above current capacity over time. Chart #2 - Stacked bar chart showing U.S. power demand in terawatt-hours (TWh) for 2025 and estimated demand in 2030. The chart compares data center and non-data center demand, showing total power demand increasing over the period.

10.12.2026

The Power Demand Supercycle

This week’s chart highlights the accelerating growth of electricity demand in the U.S., which has been driven primarily by the…

Bar chart showing average monthly VIX levels from 1990 through October 2026. The x-axis displays months of the year from January through December, and the y-axis displays VIX level. October has the highest average VIX level among all months, while April has the lowest. The chart also includes a current VIX level and a long-term average VIX level for comparison. Source: Bloomberg as of October 2, 2026. Data series begins in 1990. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

10.05.2026

Spooky Season

For investors, the spookiest thing about October might not be the ghosts and monsters that are bound to show up…

Line chart showing 10-year U.S. Treasury rate, 5-year/5-year breakeven inflation rate, and 10-year real yield from December 2025 through September 2026. The left axis shows rates from 3.6% to 5.4%, and the right axis from 1.6% to 3.0%. The Treasury rate and real yield rise notably in late 2026, while the breakeven inflation rate remains relatively range-bound around 2.3%–2.4%. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

09.28.2026

Getting Real on Inflation

The phrase “expectations of higher inflation” has become a staple in financial news to explain the increase in nominal U.S….

Dual-axis line chart comparing LBO/M&A/Recapitalization Activity, its average level, and the SOFR (90-Day) rate from 3Q18 through 2Q26. LBO/M&A/Recapitalization Activity ranges from approximately $0 billion to $100 billion, while SOFR ranges from 0% to approximately 5%. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

09.21.2026

Let’s Make a Deal

For much of the past several years, the conventional view has been that higher interest rates and stretched valuations would…

Line chart comparing annualized return and annualized risk for stock-bond portfolio combinations from 1976-2019 and 2020-2026. Two lines show the range of return and risk outcomes across portfolio allocations during each period. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

09.14.2026

No More Free Lunch?

There are many great things about working at Marquette Associates, but “Free Lunch Tuesday” is right at the top of…

Combination stacked column and line chart comparing EMD fund flows (columns) and index cumulative returns (lines), June 2024 to present. Indices used: JPM EMBI GD Index and JPM GBI EM GD Index. Since May 2025, Monthly Flows have been positive, with the exception of March 2026. Most recent datapoint: July 31, 2026 Hard Currency Flows $1.2B, Local Currency $1.6B, JPM EMBI GD Index at 21.2%, JPM GBI EM GD Index at 23.1%. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

09.08.2026

EMD’s Second Chance?

Over the last several years, emerging market debt (EMD) has faced several headwinds, with rising yields across other fixed income…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >