Taking Cues From the Market

Amid today’s extraordinary levels of uncertainty and speculation, we welcome anything that can offer some sense of visibility. Earnings season tends to be just that, giving public companies a platform to formally update the market on their recent performance and future outlook. While guidance in this environment is not what it normally is, the market’s reaction to what is said offers insightful perspective into the thought process of active participants.

During the first two weeks of earnings season, we heard from companies across sectors, representing almost a quarter of the S&P 500 Index’s market capitalization. For this analysis, we focus on the change to consensus current fiscal year (FY1) EPS estimates. This should not only capture actual results reported, but the outlook for the rest of the year. For companies that have already reported, estimates have come down more than 20%, with an initial modest revision going into earnings and a larger cut post the report.

On average, stocks were flat across sectors despite these major cuts to earnings expectations. Certain sectors particularly stand out — FY1 EPS expectations for Energy stocks came down an additional 42% after earnings reports and stocks were up 1% in response while Consumer Discretionary expectations were cut an additional 33% and stocks rose 6% on the news. While there are nuances not captured by these averages, from a high level it implies company results and outlooks were roughly in line with buy-side expectations — in some cases better — refuting one of the oft-cited catalysts for a correction to the rebound that some argue has gone too far too fast.

We do not claim to know where the market is headed from here, but early signs from earnings season give us reasons to be optimistic that, for now, the bottom is in.

Print PDF > Taking Cues From the Market

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

The Slow Road to Recovery: Phase Four Relief Stimulus in Context

The $484 billion latest coronavirus relief stimulus package passed through the Senate on Tuesday (April 21st), passed through the House on Thursday (April 23rd), and was signed into law by President Trump on Friday (April 24th). Here we assess this most recent relief package along with the rest of the fiscal and monetary stimulus put forth so far as well as other key issues that pertain to the slow road to recovery from the pandemic.

Read > The Slow Road to Recovery: Phase Four Relief Stimulus in Context

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Why Did the Price of Oil Turn Negative?

The price of oil as measured by the May WTI futures contract (gray line) fell to negative territory for the first time in history on Monday, plunging to -$40 before expiring at a positive price on Tuesday. Decreased demand for oil due to travel restrictions has caused an abnormal situation where in the short term, oil producers were willing to pay buyers to take their oil as they had limited storage space. Since physical delivery occurs on these future contracts, some were at risk of having purchased oil with no place to put it. However, when we look at the further dated June WTI futures contract (green line), the price change has not been as dramatic and remains in positive territory.

Demand has significantly weakened for oil, and supply cuts have been coming too late which are driving the price down. Price volatility is expected to be extremely high in the near term as gasoline and jet fuel are simply sitting in storage. Oil prices need to be around roughly $20 a barrel for United States domiciled companies to break even. Smaller energy companies with high debt burdens whose revenues are tied to the price of oil are unable to sustain low prices for long and are at risk of bankruptcy and laying off employees, further adding to the economic stress caused by the coronavirus. Such negative outcomes will also weigh on the equity and bond markets — as seen earlier this week — so the price of oil is clearly another economic variable that will be closely monitored through this pandemic.

Print PDF > Why Did the Price of Oil Turn Negative?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

What Does the COVID-19 Pandemic Mean for Private Equity Investments?

Given the significant amount of volatility in the public markets and uncertainty surrounding the economic outlook as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, this newsletter provides an update and outlook for private market investors.

This newsletter covers the valuation process used by private equity and debt funds, the expected impact on first quarter valuations for private market funds, how portfolios are positioned to handle the economic slowdown, what GPs are doing in this environment to protect and position their portfolio companies for the slowdown, and Marquette Associates’ outlook for the remainder of the year.

Read > What Does the COVID-19 Pandemic Mean for Private Equity Investments?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

 

Q1 2020 Market Insights Video

This video features an in-depth analysis of the first quarter’s performance with a special focus looking forward from the coronavirus pandemic and resulting economic and market impacts.

Our Market Insights series examines the primary asset classes we cover for clients including the U.S. economy, fixed income, U.S. and non-U.S. equities, hedge funds, real estate, infrastructure, private equity, and private credit, with presentations by our research analysts and directors. For more information, questions, or feedback, please send us an email.

Was March 23rd the Market Bottom?

The S&P 500 hit its recent peak on February 19th, 2020. Just sixteen trading days later it entered bear market territory and by March 23rd, the S&P 500 was down 33.2% from its all-time high. The intensity and speed of the sell-off surpassed both 1987 and 1929, two infamous years in investment history. Since March 23rd, the S&P 500 has rallied 27.4% through April 14th prompting the question: have we already seen the market bottom?

Identifying a market bottom is a near impossible task, one that is much easier with hindsight. Most bear markets see stocks rally 10% or more before falling back down and hitting a new bottom. The Global Financial Crisis produced five such bounces before finding its floor in March 2009. Near the turn of the century, the Tech Bubble produced three “false” rallies. Based on these data points, history would tell us that there are still further losses ahead. However, every bear market is unique and this one certainly fits that bill. Given the speed of the decline, might we see a faster recovery? The answer to that question is likely predicated on how well the spread of COVID-19 is controlled and whether we see a second wave of infections.

Print PDF > Was March 23rd the Market Bottom?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Did Volatility Risk Premium Strategies Deliver in March?

The longest bull market in history ended abruptly in March as U.S. stocks finished their worst quarter since the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). The magnitude and speed by which the S&P 500 index sold off from late February through March shocked investors; what happened over multiple years during the GFC happened in a matter of weeks. During that same time period, the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) hit an all-time high, as markets tried to discern the extent of the economic fallout from the spread of COVID-19. Volatility Risk Premium (VRP) strategies — which are designed to provide equity upside but downside protection — were not immune to the financial market dislocations but performed in line with our expectations and are set to rebound more quickly when broader market indices stabilize.

This newsletter reviews VRP strategies and provides an overview of recent manager performance and expectations going forward.

Read > Did Volatility Risk Premium Strategies Deliver in March?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

What Have the Last Two Downturns Taught Us About Private Equity?

While each economic downturn is certainly unique, we can look back over the Dot-Com Crisis and the Global Financial Crisis to see how private equity markets performed relative to public equity markets. In both cases, the private equity market1 bottomed 3–6 months later than public markets (due to the lag in reporting), but with a less significant trough. Returns within private equity markets also recovered more quickly as they recovered 1.5–2 years sooner than public markets and generated significant relative outperformance.

The lack of liquidity combined with lagged and overall less frequent reporting works to most investors’ advantages in volatile markets as there is a “smoothing” effect that often generates less fear and the lack of liquidity limits the ability to sell at what may be the worst time for value creation. Quarterly valuations are provided on a 2–3 month lag which provides the benefit of future knowledge on where markets are headed. Perhaps most critical for investors to understand is that throughout an economic downturn — such as the one we are currently experiencing — private equity portfolio allocations will likely rise due to this lag in reporting, but these levels are temporary as markets are correlated to some degree. Unfortunately, some investors look at this temporarily higher allocation (which are predominantly due to the denominator effect) and choose to reduce their private equity program investment; often these liquidations are done at a significant discount. Historically, selling or pulling back on investing has been a big mistake as these investors have missed out on four of the best vintages over the last 25 years.

The primary concern in this downturn is that with a significant portion of the U.S. economy essentially closed, many small businesses do not have sufficient liquidity to weather substantial losses of revenue. However, we would caution that performance will vary by industry and geography as some businesses are operating at relatively high levels in this environment and should be positioned to accelerate as the economy returns to a more normal state. Across the private equity asset class, investor allocations are also higher as reflected by the strong fundraising in recent years, which means the industry is well capitalized to support many businesses throughout this downturn. This significant “dry powder” that private equity firms have at their disposal is likely to be deployed to support existing portfolio companies as well as towards new opportunities that arise from a less competitive landscape as many less well-capitalized businesses will inevitability fail throughout this downturn.

The previous two downturns proved private equity is not immune to public equity market corrections, but the asset class has historically recovered quickly and resumed its place as a return-enhancing component of investor portfolios. Although the denominator effect may drive private equity allocations above intended targets in the context of an overall portfolio, these differences are only temporary in nature and private equity investors are best served to maintain their allocations rather than selling at a steep discount in the secondary market. From a long-term perspective, making consistent allocations and maintaining exposure has best served portfolio returns, and we do not expect that pattern to change in the current downturn.

Print PDF > What Have the Last Two Downturns Taught Us About Private Equity?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Light at the End of the Tunnel?

While the coronavirus pandemic is far from over, signs of improvement ranging from infections peaking to progress in the search for a cure seem to be arising on a daily basis lately. The following newsletter summarizes some of these key positive indicators and offers some guidance for portfolios in the months to come.

Read > Light at the End of the Tunnel?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

How Will Private Real Estate Be Impacted by Coronavirus and the Market Downturn?

As we have seen in past market downturns, almost all risk assets feel some degree of pain as correlations trend towards one and returns drift downwards in seemingly perfect harmony. In the case of private real estate, headlines have been sparse to this point but it is only a matter of time until the repercussions are felt, particularly for the sectors hardest hit by the outbreak.

This newsletter details potential near-term and long-term effects of the coronavirus pandemic on private real estate, with a look at historical performance as well as some of the unique features of this particular downturn.

Read > How Will Private Real Estate Be Impacted by Coronavirus and the Market Downturn?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.