As economies and capital markets become increasingly more integrated, interest in global equity investing has soared over the past few years, making some U.S. institutional investors question the traditional partitioned approach of U.S. and non-U.S. equity allocations. Over the last ten years, allocations to global equity mandates (as a percentage of new commitments to global and international funds) have risen from 6% in 2000 to almost 40% by 2011.1 In essence, U.S. investors have increased global equity mandates as a percentage of their total equity allocations, meaning a shift from a partitioned U.S., non-U.S. approach to a global program.
Global Equity Position Paper
The following paper examines global equity as an asset class, focusing on justifications and concerns for investing globally rather than via a traditional partitioned U.S. and non-U.S. approach. Furthermore, relative performance, risks, and meaningful outperformance from active management are also considered. Ultimately, this paper strives to investigate the theoretical reasons for global investing and whether these same arguments hold true in reality.