Category: Chart of the Week

Should Investors Be Concerned About Yield Curve Inversion?

After eight post-recession Fed rate hikes since 2015, the U.S. Treasury yield curve continues to flatten. On Monday, December 3, the yield curve inverted by one basis point between the three-year yield at 2.84% and the five-year yield at 2.83%. The next day, that inversion intensified to two basis points, with the three-year yield at 2.81% and the five-year yield at 2.79%, causing an 800-point correction in the Dow. The bellwether steepness indicator — the difference between the two-year yield and 10-year yield — remains upward sloping, however, but narrowed from 15bp on Monday with the two-year at 2.83% and 10-year at 2.98% to 11bp on Tuesday with the two-year at 2.80% and 10-year at 2.91%.

Based on previous market cycles, an inverted yield curve has predicted a recession six months to two years after inversion. Prior to the 2008 crisis, the first sign of inversion occurred in the 4th quarter of 2005, when the three-year and five-year inverted first, followed by the two- and ten-year inverting in the same quarter, roughly two years before the crisis that began in early 2008. This week’s chart shows the actual yield curve at the end of the day on December 4, along with the predicted yield curve at the end of this year and the next three years based on Treasury forwards. We can see that the market expects the curve to be generally upward sloping for the rest of this year, but to further invert in the front of the curve to the belly, and remain inverted in that region, for the next three years. However, the market still shows the 10s minus 2s to be upward sloping, even in the outer years.

Over the last few quarters, the expectations for the Fed’s hikes declined from one this December plus four more in 2019 to one this December plus only one more in June 2019. With this first sign of inversion, the Fed may pause on a hike for December, but it has communicated the hike so much that it may have to move forward with it or risk a loss of credibility. As 2018 heads to a close, this recent inversion bears watching and will no doubt have an impact on this month’s as well as next year’s capital markets.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Are Bonds Approaching Moderate Value?

This week’s chart looks at how bonds have fared during the global volatility of the last two months. In summary, bonds have retrenched a bit but have protected principal overall as expected and served as good diversifiers to other asset classes such as equities and alternatives. Spreads have widened moderately and are now showing some value across the board.

The four sections of the chart show the spread versus the average for core bonds, bank loans, high yield bonds and emerging markets debt. The timeframes are from the end of 2008 to today, but the averages are based on the last 20 years excluding 2008 and 2009 as outliers. As we can see, each of the spreads are rising and approaching averages. They are no longer near post-2008 tights anymore. This signifies that there may perhaps be some moderate value in fixed income today.

The fundamentals and the global macro backdrop support a moderate outlook. U.S. and European high yield and leveraged loan default rates remain low. Leverage, coverage, issuance and outstanding amounts do not point to a frothy market. Aggressive issuance is experiencing a shift away from high yield and into bank loans but remains modest overall. As the effect of Trump’s tax cuts continues to be felt through strong corporate earnings and the global tariff escalation continues to evolve, the Federal Reserve has enough optimism about the economy to warrant its continued pace of rate hikes. Collectively, these trends suggest stable if not improving valuation, fundamental and macro factors as we approach the New Year.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

America’s Infrastructure Report Card

Pending a final vote count in Florida, the U.S. midterm election results are in with the Democrats regaining control of the House and Republicans maintaining majority control of the Senate. While a split Congress may lead to gridlock on various policies, one thing both parties should be able to agree on is the need for infrastructure investments in the U.S.

The historical under-investment, coupled with the lack of available public-sector funding, has impaired the government’s ability to deliver public services at adequate levels. The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) estimated that $4.5 trillion needs to be invested through 2025 to upgrade the nation’s infrastructure. In its annual report, the ASCE in 2017 gave an overall “D+” grade for the condition and capacity of infrastructure in the U.S., further highlighting the need for additional investment.

Consequently, governments and public agencies have begun looking beyond the traditional funding methods to private investment in infrastructure via privatizations and public-private partnerships (“PPPs”). As a result, ownership and operation of infrastructure assets has been gradually moving from the public to the private sector on a global level. With this trend, the role of government has shifted from the provider of services to that of a regulator. This has provided a stream of investment opportunities and fueled development of a distinct alternative asset class for institutional investors that complements fixed income, public equities, real estate, and traditional private equity investments, and whose popularity is likely to increase as more investments and hence products come to fruition.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Will U.S. Equities Rally to Finish the Year?

U.S. equities experienced a sharp correction last month with broad market indices erasing virtually all their year-to-date returns. The October pullback was especially jarring for investors since it followed an unusually quiet third quarter and had seemingly few changes in the economy or corporate earnings to warrant such a sell-off. Unlike the volatility seen in the first quarter of 2018, the S&P 500 didn’t record a single daily move of more than ±1% in the third quarter. During October, the S&P 500 saw a total of ten daily moves greater than ±1%, surpassing the total number seen in all of calendar year 2017. The recent resurgence of equity volatility coupled with the anticipation of midterm election results has created uncertainty in the outlook for risk assets in the near-term.

While stock prices are ultimately affected by a variety of factors, the fourth quarter has historically yielded the highest percentage of positive market returns compared to other quarters. In addition, market returns following midterm elections tend to be quite strong. Examining S&P 500 returns during midterm election years dating back to 1946, we see that the S&P 500 has never ended the year below its October closing low. The average return over these last 18 midterm elections is +10.6%. Although the sample size for post midterm elections is small, it is reassuring to know that we are in a historically strong period for equity markets.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Buying the Dip Takes a Hit

Historically, investors have attempted to capitalize from market drops by buying at the new lows in hopes that the stocks would rebound shortly thereafter. “Buying the dip” has generally proven effective ­— albeit by small margins — however 2018 has been an interesting exception. Notably, October’s steady trend downward has caused 2018 to flip into the red; through September, the “buy the dip” theory was still rewarded.

Our chart tracks data back nearly twenty years, through 1999, and throughout this data set the only other negative calendar years were 2000–2002. This suggests that currently, investors may be more leery of equity markets and less optimistic that the markets will rebound after a negative day. While investor sentiment certainly impacts the market, this is only a short-term bearish indicator. Midterm elections are right around the corner and historically the November of midterm election years has outperformed Novembers of other years, giving investors some optimism of what the end of 2018 may have in store for their portfolios.

Print PDF

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Market Anomaly or the Beginning of the End?

So far, October has been a forgettable month for equity performance. Internet and technology companies — once the darling of this rally — have been among the hardest hit, as many investors appear to be taking profits as signs of slower earnings and economic growth have started to appear. Meanwhile, industrial companies have also been hit hard, as trade war rhetoric continues to grow between China and Washington, and China’s GDP growth was its weakest since the financial crisis. Through Wednesday, the materials, energy, industrials, and technology sectors all are in correction territory, with the following losses:

  • Materials: -13.0%
  • Energy: -12.5%
  • Industrials: -11.6%
  • Technology: -10.8%

Not surprisingly, volatility — as measured by the VIX index — has skyrocketed as equities have sold off.

More generally, October’s sell-off has been related to the health of the global economy; investors appear concerned about rising U.S. interest rates, a strong U.S. dollar, slowing global growth and trade wars. Only time will tell if October is part of a larger sell-off in global markets and the end of a nine-year bull market in the U.S., or just an anomaly. Going forward, investors will dissect third quarter earnings and be focused on company guidance going into 2019. If growth prospects for 2019 look tepid, many expect this sell-off to continue into year-end and the VIX to remain elevated.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Italy Looks to Increase Its Budget Deficit

The yield on Italian 10-year government bonds has risen this year as investor concern about the country’s fiscal policies mounts. This week Italy approved its 2019 budget targeting a 2.4% deficit to gross domestic product — a larger number than markets anticipated and a higher targeted deficit than 2018’s 1.8%. The Italian coalition government is targeting higher spending to implement a monthly income for low-income citizens and reduce the retirement age despite its high public debt to GDP ratio, 131% in 2017. The European Union will provide its formal comments on the proposed budget in the coming weeks and this will likely create some short-term market movements.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

A Shining Light for China?

On September 25, MSCI, Inc. — a leading global provider of research-based indices and analytics — announced its plans to consult on a further weight increase to China A-shares in the MSCI Global Investable Market Indexes. The changes under consideration include quadrupling the weighting of Chinese A-share large companies in its global benchmarks, adding mid-cap names, and including ChiNext as an eligible stock exchange segment. This consultation follows the successful implementation of an initial 5% inclusion of China A-shares in the MSCI China and related composite indices (such as the MSCI Emerging Markets Index) in May and August 2018.

Let’s unpack the full proposal, piece by piece. The first change would be an increase to the inclusion factor of China A-share large cap securities from 5% to 20% over two phases. Specifically, MSCI would target a 7.5% increase coinciding with their May 2019 semi-annual index review and another 7.5% bump up with their August 2019 quarterly index review. Second, MSCI would increase the list of eligible Chinese stock exchange segments by adding the ChiNext board of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange during the May 2019 review. The ChiNext board, where most technology firms make their debut, represents 20% of the total China A-shares opportunity set and has a larger free-float adjusted market capitalization than Shenzhen main and SME boards. Lastly, China A-share mid cap securities would be included with a 20% inclusion factor as part of the May 2020 semi-annual index review.

MSCI’s rationale for the suggested expansion of A-share inclusion is largely driven by the incremental improvements in market accessibility implemented by China. Since the announcement of MSCI China A shares inclusions in July 2017, the daily trading limit and number of new accounts opened has significantly increased within the Stock Connect program, which is an investment channel between Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Shenzhen that allows international and mainland Chinese investors to trade securities in each other’s markets. There has also been a considerable drop in the number of trading suspensions. For example, the number of large cap trade suspensions in the MSCI China A International IMI Index has decreased from 16 to zero over the past 15 months.

The above chart depicts the pro-forma country weights should these changes be implemented. As indicated, Chinese A-shares’ portion of the index would increase from 0.7% to 3.4%. The anticipated net effect would be a slight increase in China’s overall representation in the MSCI Emerging Markets index by 1.0%.

While MSCI’s consultation may or may not lead to changes in the MSCI indices, this proposal indicates growing confidence in market liberalization within China. And, if implemented, these moves will increase foreign investor inflows into China’s $7 trillion stock market. Chinese markets have been able to handle increased trading volumes. This reaffirms our view that institutional investors will increasingly have exposure to China’s local markets over medium to long term.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Are Small-Cap Equity Opportunities Disappearing?

In 1996, there were more than 8,000 companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges. Today, that figure is less than half. This sharp decline can be largely attributed to the disappearance of many small-cap stocks within the U.S. equity market. Small companies are staying private longer due to rigorous regulatory requirements and prohibitive costs associated with going public. As a result, true small-cap exposure is becoming harder and harder for investors to obtain in traditional equity markets.

Given the strong returns of small-cap equities, many investors have made significant allocations to small-cap equity funds. The inefficient nature and relatively large universe of smaller stocks has historically provided a wide opportunity for investments in companies that are commonly overlooked or underfollowed. When looking at the number of small-cap companies in the Russell 2000 and Russell 3000 index over the past decade, it reaffirms there are fewer attractive small-cap opportunities within the U.S. equity market for investors.

In 2008, the number of small-cap companies (market cap less than $500M) in the Russell 2000 index (small-cap benchmark) were 1,307. Just a decade later, that number has fallen 54% to just 603 companies. A similar trend can be seen in the Russell 3000 index (total market benchmark) with small-cap companies declining from 46% of the index in 2008 to just 20% of the index in 2018.

While attractive small-cap opportunities still exist in the U.S. equity market, true small-cap exposure is becoming more difficult for investors to obtain within their portfolios. If this trend persists, we expect investor capital to continue to seek out private market alternatives for this small-cap exposure.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

U.S. Petroleum Production Surges

U.S. crude oil production peaked in November 1970 at just over 10 million barrels per day. That record stood until this year, when U.S. production surpassed its previous high, and with OPEC’s recent decision to keep production constant, there are perhaps more opportunities for additional U.S. production to fill in the demand gap. As a matter of background, petroleum is the sum of crude oil (used for gasoline, jet fuel, diesel, and heavy applications such as asphalt and tar) and hydrocarbon liquids (most common examples are natural gas, propane, and butane).

Natural gas drilling has increased substantially since the passing of the Energy Policy Act (“EPAct”) of 2005 and has been a significant driver of the increase in petroleum production and exports. Furthermore, this legislation loosened regulation and put incentives in place to drive growth in crude oil and natural gas production in the United States, with the goals of reducing reliance on foreign sources and providing a buffer against high energy costs. This has driven 7.4% and 5.7% annualized growth of U.S. natural gas and crude oil production over the past 13 years, respectively. Historically crude oil production has driven overall petroleum output for the United States, but since the EPAct of 2005, natural gas has had a significant influence on the domestic energy markets. Natural gas’ share of the overall U.S. petroleum output has risen from 15.4% in January 1973 to 28.9% in June 2018.

Overall U.S. petroleum production has increased by roughly 8,000 barrels per day since the passing of the EPAct of 2005, resulting in a 519.6% increase in U.S. petroleum exports, and a 23.1% decrease in U.S. petroleum imports over the same period. With Brent Crude oil exceeding $80 per barrel in September, the active count of U.S. rigs is likely to increase as greater profit opportunities return to the petroleum market.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.