Category: Chart of the Week

Slower Earnings Growth in 2019?

With the Tax Cut and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) now a little over a year old, this week’s chart looks at the effect of the tax cut on companies in the S&P 500. Despite a headline corporate tax rate of 35%, S&P companies in aggregate were paying an effective tax of only 25% over the twelve months leading up to the tax cut. Lowering the headline rate from 35% to 21% has clearly had an effect, as the tax rate for the S&P at the end of the third quarter was down to just 18.4% (a reduction of almost 27% year-over-year). This was one of the main drivers of strong growth in profits for U.S. companies, as the S&P 500 earnings growth peaked at 27% year-over-year in the third quarter (blue dotted line in the second chart). However, as we move into 2019 the positive effects on earnings growth from the tax cuts will fade, and corporate earnings growth in 2019 is likely to be significantly slower than what investors experienced in 2018, which could be a headwind for the equity market as the year progresses.

Print PDF> Slower Earnings Growth in 2019?

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

 

Can a Government Shutdown Slow the IPO Market?

Companies have been staying private longer, but expectations for Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) in 2019 are high. Uber and Lyft filed their intent to list their shares publicly with the SEC in December. Most recently, other private companies have been exploring if it makes sense to go public at current valuations. Peloton, the popular exercise bike company, has been exploring an IPO this year as its valuation has climbed to more than $4 billion, roughly 3 times as much as its $1.25 billion valuation in 2017. The chart above shows the amount of money raised via IPOs in each calendar year. But what risk does the previous government shutdown have for the IPO market?

The most favorable time for an IPO is typically when the stock market is doing well, volatility is low, and political risks are mitigated. Due to the recent partial government shutdown, the SEC is backlogged with paperwork, which has delayed planned IPOs during this current favorable environment. The risk is that if another shutdown occurs, there could be an extended delay featuring stale financial statements and other administrative delays, which would naturally discourage companies from wanting to go public. The companies that are most at risk are those that are running low on cash and need capital to continue operating. Business owners and venture capitalists are also at risk of not being able to cash out as quickly as they would like. Though the shutdown has caused a delay in listing, it should not prevent the blockbuster companies from listing publicly. Companies like Uber – which has been valued as high as $120 billion – are looking to tap the larger pool of capital in the public markets. Even though the government shutdown has already caused delays of around 30 days, the expectation is that 2019 will ultimately provide a record amount of capital raised through IPOs.

Print PDF > Can a Government Shutdown Slow the IPO Market?

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Can the PG&E Bankruptcy Create Profits for Hedge Funds?

This week’s chart of the week examines the price performance of Pacific Gas and Electric (“PG&E”) Corporation’s public debt and equity. Because of what they provide, publicly traded utilities have long been considered defensive investments due to their relative stability throughout economic cycles.

In the third quarter of 2018 hedge funds began buying shares of this California public utility on the view that PG&E’s liability for 2017 wildfires would be much lower than expected. This buying took place ahead of the deadliest wildfire in California history which many blamed on PG&E electrical lines.  PG&E’s exposure to wildfire liabilities is heightened by the state’s inverse condemnation, a legal standard which holds utilities responsible for all damages caused by their equipment. On January 29th PG&E filed for bankruptcy related to the more than $30 billion in liabilities it faces related to California wildfires in 2017 and 2018.

Many hedge funds that bought both debt and equity of PG&E in the third quarter of last year have seen the equity and debt sell-off over 60% and 18% respectively through January. This price drop has caused some managers to exit their positions. With the company announcing a bankruptcy filing, distressed hedge funds have stepped in to buy up both the equity and debt of the company.  Their rationale for doing so is that the payout of the liabilities will be smaller than originally expected and thus both equity and debt prices can recover enough to deliver a profit relative to the currently depressed prices.

Print PDF > Can the PG&E Bankruptcy Create Profits for Hedge Funds?

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Equities Close to a Key Resistance Level

This week’s chart looks at price action of the Value Line Geometric Index. Originally launched in 1961, the Value Line Geometric Index provides exposure to North American equities. It is comprised of over 1,600 companies from the NYSE, Nasdaq, Toronto Stock Exchange, and various over-the-counter markets. The index is equally weighted, and thus can provide insight into the health or breadth of the overall equity market relative to more commonly referenced market cap weighted indices. Market cap weighted indices, by design, are disproportionately driven by their larger market cap weighted components. Thus, an examination of equally weighted indices can shed light on trends often missed when focused solely on the actions of market cap weighted indices.

As seen in the chart above, the Value Line index has historically encountered resistance at the $500 price level. The index traded near this key resistance level in 1998, 2007, and 2015. More recently, the index was able to break out above this resistance level beginning in December 2016. Following the 2016 election, the index saw broad market participation as a result of the current administration’s pro-growth narrative and late cycle fiscal stimulus effects. A host of factors contributed to the recent retracement of the index below this $500 level starting in mid-2018 including concerns over rising interest rates, slowing global growth, trade/tariff effects, and various political uncertainties.

From a technical analysis standpoint, if the index can maintain a sustained breakout above this level then this would be a bullish signal for equities. However, a failure to retest and breach this level could signify further downside risk and warrant a cautious stance within equities.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Did the Fourth Quarter Wake Up a Sleeping Bear?

Like past bull markets, this most recent one since 2009 has had relatively little daily volatility, which we define here as moves greater than two standard deviations from the mean daily return. Specifically, we look at two standard deviations to the downside during a calendar year basis as compared to its historical average over the last few market cycles. This means the S&P 500 would’ve fallen about 2.2% or more in a single day. The last three bull markets are roughly visualized through the valleys in this negative volatility, which is indicative of the smooth ride up investors have had.

Not surprisingly, the majority of total positive and negative two standard deviation moves have been on the negative side at about 60% of the time since 1990, or in days, about seven trading days per year. In 2018, investors experienced significantly more downside volatility than in recent years; however, within the context of bear market years, this move is not so bad. While this is an interesting story from the data, ultimately macroeconomic and geopolitical developments will undoubtedly determine if this bull market has any life left.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Brexit Contributes to Global Uncertainty

Political instability increased dramatically in 2018 and the Brexit looms as a major contributor to the uncertainty in 2019. The UK is scheduled to leave the European Union (EU) on March 29th, 2019 however there is no current plan in place for the exit. On Tuesday, January 15th, the UK government resoundingly rejected Prime Minister May’s Brexit plan, 432 votes to 202. May had negotiated this agreement with the EU in an attempt to organize an orderly departure.

On Wednesday January 16th, a day after her plan’s defeat, Prime Minister May survived a vote of no confidence, 325 votes to 306. With her leadership role intact, May must develop an exit plan that the UK leadership will pass, and the EU will approve. This must be done with the clock ticking and as we move closer to March 29th, the possibility of a “no deal” Brexit increases. This is an outcome neither the UK nor the EU want, and if this occurs, volatility in equity markets is likely to spike. To avoid this, we may see a vote to delay the exit and should the UK fail to reach an agreement perhaps we may see a second referendum. Ultimately, as is usually the case with these types of issues, markets will welcome any resolution that clears up the uncertainty surrounding the event.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

 

U.S. Credit Market Health Check

This week’s chart looks at two key indicators of the health of the U.S. credit market. The first, on the left, shows a growing portion of covenant-light (“cov-lite”) bank loans relative to full-covenant bank loans.¹ The second indicator, on the right, shows a growing portion of loan-only bank loan issuers, which remove the benefit of a credit cushion for bank loan investors.² Recent studies by Credit Suisse show that recovery rates for cov-lite issuers are 10-15% worse than non-cov-lite issuers, and recovery rates for loan-only unitranche issuers are 15% worse than non-unitranche issuers. As such, there is some structural deterioration in the bank loan market, but the general consensus is that this should not be a 2019 story, but 2-3 years out. This means that there is not a very high concern of a credit crunch in 2019, but potentially in 2020-2021 if prices get to frothy levels again by then.

That said, defaults remain low, so at least for now, there is no sign of immediate trouble. And spreads have widened out over the last couple of months to be wider than average excluding 2008 and 2009 levels, showing that there has been some release in pressure and the market is perhaps pricing in some of these concerns. Most bank loan strategies are now focused on quality credit selection, avoiding deals with high leverage and unreliable assets or unreliable earnings. That said, as this cycle wears on, we would certainly want to remember that despite their senior secured nature, bank loans are still sub-investment grade debt and should be balanced with a healthy core bond allocation.

Print PDF

¹ Covenant-light means that the bank loan issuer is subject to few restrictions, also known as covenants, in managing its business. For example, covenants could be maximum leverage (debt divided by cash flows) or minimum coverage (cash flows divided by interest expenses). The rise in cov-lite deals has been a reality since 2005 and they appear to be here to stay. One reason for their rise is due to the standardization and syndication of bank loans as a public security, thereby making them become more like high yield bonds, which have very little covenants, and less like private credit.

² This means that, in the event of bankruptcy, the bank loan investors do not have a high yield, junior subordinated debt tranche beneath them for the losses to eat into after the equity tranche. The bank loan investors will see immediate losses right after the equity tranche in this case.

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

 

Nowhere to Hide in 2018

As we enter 2019, we look back on what was a pretty poor year for investors. There was just nowhere to hide in 2018 as a volatile 4th quarter turned all major indices negative. The downward catalyst occurred when Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said interest rates were “a long way” from what he considered neither stimulative nor restrictive.

For the year, the S&P 500 lost 4.4%, the Russell 2000 lost 11%, and emerging markets (as measured by the MSCI EM index) lost 14.6%. These losses came mostly as volatility spiked with the CBOE Volatility Index up 132% in 2018. Strong market fundamentals have largely been overshadowed by fear as global growth concerns, trade, and rising interest rate worries continue to pressure markets. This broad market correction has been historically unusual, but years with broadly poor returns from a majority of indices are typically followed by a positive year as investors find value in market opportunities.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

 

Equities Continue Their Wild Ride

It has been a wild ride since the equity market peaked on September 20th. Almost three months later, the S&P 500 is down 14.0%, marking the second market correction this year. Corrections occur when the market falls more than 10% from its market peak. Investors have been caught off-guard by this year’s volatility given last year’s slow and steady rise. While we predicted that 2018 would most likely be more eventful than 2017’s record-breaking tranquility, we could not predict to what extent. Year to date, we have seen market movements in excess of 1% in one out of every five days this year, and four of the five largest Dow Jones Industrials Average point drops ever despite strong positive economic data within the United States.

Market pauses occur frequently. Since 1920, the S&P 500 has on average experienced a 5% pullback 3 times a year, a 10% correction once a year, and a 20% bear market decline every 3 years.¹ What’s important is that corrections are merely temporary movements and have little impact on returns over the long-term. Since the bottom of the market in 2009, the S&P 500 has returned over 350% cumulatively and 15% annualized. The chart above shows the S&P 500’s cumulative returns after every correction this market cycle.

Markets are constantly under pressure from external events; recent history includes 2010’s Sovereign Debt Crisis, the 2011 U.S. debt downgrade, and fear of slowing Chinese growth in the winter of 2016. Today, market returns are almost flat since February’s market correction. Returns have eventually rebounded after each correction (including the global Financial Crisis) due to the underlying fundamentals of the economy and not elements of fear.

We acknowledge that while global growth did not meet investors’ expectations in 2018, the United States continues to meet or even exceed expectations. Third quarter GDP came in at 3.5%, unemployment is a low 3.7%, personal income is up, corporate earnings are strong, and inflation is a healthy 2.2%. The fundamental backdrop is still positive for the U.S. and is a stark contrast to the market’s performance quarter-to-date. While the recent volatility can be uncomfortable, waiting for market performance to realign with economic fundamentals can be rewarding over the long-term.

Print PDF

 

¹ Fidelity Investments, Viewpoints, November 5, 2018

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

What Do Higher Rates Mean for Asset Class Returns?

Higher interest rates coupled with signs of a global slowdown and roughly two months of market volatility — including several periods of a selloff — have clouded an otherwise positive picture of the U.S. economy. Despite this, many investors are still worried future increases in interest rates will hinder the economy, given growth in the U.S. and other regions is likely to slow down next year.

An analysis of the performance of different asset classes during U.S. rate hike cycles since the 1990’s suggests the opposite — these cycles were largely positive for investors. In fact, during the most recent hike cycle (Jan-16 to Nov-18), annualized returns for both private and public markets (excluding real estate) were well above their 1-year annualized rates of return before the initial hike began. The orange bars, which illustrate the various asset classes’ 1-year returns before the hike cycle, are well below their annualized returns during the cycle, as depicted by the colored columns. U.S. equities (S&P 500) outperformed other asset classes, gaining almost 12% during this period. U.S. buyout, non-U.S. equities and fixed income gained roughly 6%, 4%, and 1%, respectively. Real estate appears as the outlier with this most recent cycle, but comes on the heels of a considerable run for real estate after the Great Recession.

When looking at 1-year annualized returns after a hike cycle occurred for the prior three rising-rate regimes in 1994, 1999 and 2004, the data paints a similar picture. As illustrated in the graph, annualized returns 1-year after the hike cycle ended (when the effect of an increase/decrease in interest rates will be felt on a wide scale) were on average higher than returns during the cycle. This is depicted by the gray bars (1-year returns after the hike) being on average well above the returns during the hike cycles.

The volatility we have seen thus far in the market is typical for the later stages of an expansion and should not be solely attributed to the Federal Reserve’s tightening policy. It is important to note that interest rate hikes alone will not adversely affect asset class performance, but rather, the economic backdrop of each rate hike cycle will determine the market outcome. Given the uncertainty surrounding the current cycle’s path moving forward, investors should expect continued volatility and watch closely for upward-trending inflation.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.