Category: Chart of the Week

Fixed Income Repositioning

This week’s Chart of the Week examines the estimated net mutual fund flows that occurred within fixed income from January 2013 through November 2013. Notable fund flow trends during this time included investors diversifying away from more traditional bond categories such as intermediate-term, municipal, government, inflation-protected bonds, and money markets.

This week’s Chart of the Week examines the estimated net mutual fund flows that occurred within fixed income from January 2013 through November 2013. Notable fund flow trends during this time included investors diversifying away from more traditional bond categories such as intermediate-term, municipal, government, inflation-protected bonds, and money markets. With generally low yield levels across fixed income asset classes and the expectation of a rising interest rate environment, investors added to categories such as bank loans, nontraditional bonds (which include unconstrained and opportunistic categories), world bonds, and short-term bonds.

Favored bond categories in 2013 tended to carry less interest rate risk such as bank loans and shorter maturity securities. Tactical investments like nontraditional bond and world bond categories where the investment manager typically has more control over interest rate or credit exposures taken at any given time also drew investment dollars. Short and ultra-short bonds were favored as a substitute for money market funds in the current low yield environment.

As investors reposition their fixed income portfolios for an expected low growth and rising interest rate environment, strategies with low interest rate risk or an emphasis on tactical flexibility within their mandates will likely continue to see net positive fund flows.

Has Household Income Peaked for Good?

In this week’s Chart of the Week, we track the real median household income in the United States over the last twenty-five years. The movement in this economic variable illustrates how the purchasing power of the typical American household has changed over time. This is an important statistic because it underpins the American ideal that every generation will do better than the previous.

In this week’s Chart of the Week, we track the real median household income in the United States over the last twenty-five years. The movement in this economic variable illustrates how the purchasing power of the typical American household has changed over time. This is an important statistic because it underpins the American ideal that every generation will do better than the previous.

Currently, real household income is sitting near a twenty-year low and has declined every year since 2007. In fact, since peaking in 1999, real household income has decreased in ten of the last thirteen years. Given the importance of consumption to GDP growth — about two-thirds of total GDP growth is driven by consumption — this downward trend in real income for the median household would appear to pose (another) notable headwind to stronger economic growth in the near future and adds to the murky outlook for 2014 GDP expansion.

An End to Household Deleveraging?

This week’s chart of the week compares the total household mortgage liability (i.e. outstanding mortgage balances) to the total owners’ equity in household real estate (i.e. home equity) for all households in the United States. As the chart indicates, in 3Q 2013 the total owners’ equity in household real estate exceeded the total household mortgage liability for the first time since the 2007/2008 financial crisis.

This week’s chart of the week compares the total household mortgage liability (i.e., outstanding mortgage balances) to the total owners’ equity in household real estate (i.e., home equity) for all households in the United States. As the chart indicates, in 3Q 2013 the total owners’ equity in household real estate exceeded the total household mortgage liability for the first time since the 2007/2008 financial crisis. This recent turnaround was driven primarily by the rebound in housing prices over the past few years (causing an increase in owners’ equity) and the large number of foreclosures on underwater homeowners over the past several years (causing both a decrease in outstanding mortgage balances and an increase in owners’ equity).

This development is significant because it may signal that household deleveraging, which has been a drag on economic activity for the past several years, is finally starting to come to an end. While still too early to determine if this data point is part of a larger economic trend, further readings of a positive gap between equity and liability should translate to stronger economic growth in the coming years.

What’s Next for the S&P 500?

This week’s chart illustrates the distribution of returns for the S&P 500 in the year following a return greater than 25%. Since 1926, the S&P 500 has produced a calendar year total return greater than 25% on 23 separate occasions.

This week’s chart illustrates the distribution of returns for the S&P 500 in the year following a return greater than 25%. Since 1926, the S&P 500 has produced a calendar year total return greater than 25% on 23 separate occasions. In the 12 months following, 15 observations or 65% of the time, the returns were positive (average return of +21.3%). Conversely, 8 observations or 35% of the time the results were negative (average return of -8.8%). Interestingly, since 1950 there have been 15 calendar years of +25% returns, yet only 3 (20%) of the following calendar years were negative. Many investors are calling for a market correction in 2014; however, a majority of the time returns have been positive and have averaged 10.9% following a calendar year return greater than 25% for the S&P 500.

Eurozone Valuations Outpace GDP Growth

This week’s Chart of the Week examines GDP growth and valuation levels in the eurozone. The chart above depicts eurozone quarterly GDP growth compared to both the prior quarter and year. As the chart shows, eurozone GDP growth is at very low or even negative levels.

This week’s Chart of the Week examines GDP growth and valuation levels in the eurozone. The chart above depicts eurozone quarterly GDP growth compared to both the prior quarter and year. As the chart shows, eurozone GDP growth is at very low or even negative levels. Growth versus the prior year has been negative since the first quarter of 2012, while growth versus the prior quarter only recently turned positive (albeit very slow at .26%) in the second quarter of 2013.

The eurozone GDP growth or lack thereof does not seem to accurately correspond to eurozone valuation levels. As seen in the chart, the eurozone’s P/E ratio has continued to increase over the past 8 quarters despite little to no growth. The P/E ratio was 14.5 at the end of the fourth quarter of 2011. Since then, the P/E ratio has climbed to 21.6 on speculation that Europe will experience a strong recovery. However, despite continued investor optimism, the main question still remains: will the European recovery truly come to fruition?

Bull Market to Continue?

The Conference Board Leading Economic Index (LEI), which consists of 10 economic variables, increased 0.7 percent from the previous month to 97.1 in September. The LEI attempts to predict future changes in the overall economy. Prior to the September release, economists estimated a median 0.6 percent increase according to a Bloomberg survey. The reported 97.1 September number represents the highest point since April 2008 (97.2).

The Conference Board Leading Economic Index (LEI), which consists of 10 economic variables, increased 0.7 percent from the previous month to 97.1 in September. The LEI attempts to predict future changes in the overall economy. Prior to the September release, economists estimated a median 0.6 percent increase according to a Bloomberg survey. The reported 97.1 September number represents the highest point since April 2008 (97.2).

Examining the historical data, two inflection points, which are circled in the chart, stand out the most. The first inflection point, the peak in April of 2000 (95.5), led to an additional 4.5% increase in the S&P 500 through August 2000. The second inflection point, March 2006 (107.9) led to the S&P 500 increasing by nearly 20% the following year ending in October of 2007. While past performance does not guarantee future results, the historical data from the LEI suggest that the market’s bull-run may continue as the economy continues its expansion, though at a modest rate.

When Will the Unemployment Rate Reach 6.5%?

This week we examine when the unemployment rate may hit the Fed’s 6.5% target, courtesy of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s Jobs Calculator TM. The chart above shows the average monthly change in payroll employment needed for the unemployment rate to hit 6.5% at the listed months.

This week we examine when the unemployment rate may hit the Fed’s 6.5% target, courtesy of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s Jobs Calculator™. The chart above shows the average monthly change in payroll employment needed for the unemployment rate to hit 6.5% at the listed months. For example, if the average monthly change is 190,000, we can expect to hit the Fed’s target around October 2014. These calculations assume the current labor participation rate of 63.2% remains constant.

Over the last 24 months the average number of new net jobs created each month in the U.S. has been 181,750. If that number persists, the Fed’s target of 6.5% will be reached in December of 2014 at which point investors may prepare for an increase in the Fed Funds rate. However, the unemployment rate does not exclusively capture labor market conditions and the Fed will undoubtedly look to other metrics including the labor force participation rate. Since 2008 the participation rate has fallen from 66.2% to 63.2%, a 35 year low. This unparalleled drop has unfortunately been a major driver in the unemployment rate’s downward movement and clouded labor market conditions. For this reason among others, economists have begun questioning whether the Fed will lower its target for unemployment and investors would be wise to not solely rely on the headline number to determine the health of the labor market.

Defaults Set to Rise?

As shown in the graph above, 2013 has been a tremendous year for both investment grade and below-investment grade companies to issue debt. Given the near record low levels of both interest rates and credit spreads, the amount of issuance has not been surprising.

As shown in the graph above, 2013 has been a tremendous year for both investment grade and below-investment grade companies to issue debt. Given the near-record low levels of both interest rates and credit spreads, the amount of issuance has not been surprising. However, one of these very metrics which has driven this supply serves as a key risk metric to watch in the coming year: credit spreads. Over the last 18 months, the option adjusted spreads (“OAS”) for investment grade debt rated AA, A, and BBB has fallen; the decline in the OAS for high yield is even more remarkable.

Certainly, these declines have benefitted credit investors, but their current low levels coupled with low default rates hints that there is only one direction for defaults and subsequent credit spread levels to go: up. While we have not yet seen alarm bells ringing for either of these items, they bear watching over the coming year.

Home Prices Rise But Are Still Below 2006 Peak

Our Chart of the Week looks at the S&P Case-Schiller 10-City Composite Index which is one of the best broad measures of housing prices in the U.S. This is a “drawdown” chart that looks at prices as a percentage of their prior peaks. When the lines on the chart are at 100%, prices are at a new all-time high.

Our Chart of the Week looks at the S&P Case-Schiller 10-City Composite Index which is one of the best broad measures of housing prices in the U.S. This is a “drawdown” chart that looks at prices as a percentage of their prior peaks. When the lines on the chart are at 100%, prices are at a new all-time high. The chart clearly shows the modest drop in housing prices that resulted from the early 1990’s recession and the severe drop in prices following the 2008 credit crisis. Over the last 24 months, home prices have started increasing again as the economy improved, employment picked up, and interest rates remained low. Nonetheless, broadly speaking, housing prices remain significantly below their prior peak in 2006. A few interesting things to note:

  •  The 10-City Composite Index fell 34% from a peak in April 2006 to a trough in January 2012. The index has subsequently increased 16% from those lows.
  • Las Vegas had the largest drop falling 62% from peak to trough. However, housing prices in Las Vegas have jumped 34% from the bottom. Las Vegas still remains the most depressed housing market where, even after the recent advance, prices are only about half of what they were at the peak.
  • Denver is the only major market that has returned to peak pricing levels. Boston has been the second most resilient market, where prices are only 10% below the prior peak.

The rebound in housing prices is providing a nice boost to U.S. GDP, employment, and the stock market. As housing prices rise, fewer homeowners are underwater on their mortgages (i.e., owing more on their mortgage than their home is worth) which improves consumer credit quality, leads to lower mortgage delinquencies, and gives homeowners more flexibility to refinance or sell their homes. All of these trends still appear to be in the early stages at this point. As long as interest rates stay low, we expect these trends to continue in the months ahead, providing a boost to the economy and the markets.

Queue Levels for Core Real Estate Managers

This week’s Chart of the Week examines queue levels of core real estate managers. Real estate’s recent performance along with its yield premium has led to increased investor interest, and consequently the formation of contribution queues. Contribution queues are the value of the cumulative dry-powder to put to work, i.e. what could potentially get called by managers in a quarter.

This week’s Chart of the Week examines queue levels of core real estate managers. Real estate’s recent performance along with its yield premium has led to increased investor interest, and consequently the formation of contribution queues. Contribution queues are the value of the cumulative dry-powder to put to work, i.e., what could potentially get called by managers in a quarter. If 100% of capital is called, the contribution queue is eliminated: prior quarter queue − capital called + new investor commitments = current quarter contribution queue.

Queue levels have to be monitored carefully because they could potentially dilute investment returns. The pressure to call capital and earn management fees might outweigh adhering to investment discipline or paying fair value for an asset. Additionally, the pressure to put money to work could lead to style drift by going outside of appropriate geographies or property types in order to increase fund size. If a significant queue exists for a particular manager, he/she may feel the pressure to put this money to work and overpay for an asset, as opposed to adhering to a more disciplined investment process. Such a practice is critical in today’s market: if one overpays in the beginning, an asset’s return potential is decreased.

Evaluating the last two years of data, the industry’s quarterly contribution queue has averaged $6.3B. For the last two years, the average queue into a fund has ranged from $292M to $426M, but two funds are driving an upward bias with these values. Excluding these two managers, the quarterly average queue into a fund has ranged from $84M to $184M. Most important to note is that queue levels have remained relatively stable as prices have rebounded. Overall, the steady level suggests that managers are remaining disciplined when completing transactions and not rushing to put money to work.