The Yield Curve Inverts: Time to Hunker Down?

This morning, the key range of the U.S. Treasury yield curve that is viewed as the bellwether of recessions — the 2-year versus the 10-year — inverted. The 10-year yield fell to 1.61%, below the 2-year’s 1.62%, as of the time of writing. The yield curve serves as a key indicator of market sentiment on future interest rates and therefore the future state of our economy. An upward sloping curve signifies a growing economy, while an inverted curve portends a contracting economy.

This newsletter details what investors should be aware of in light of the inversion, including the possibility of a recession, effects on the equity market, and other current events that may contribute to uncertainty and volatility.

Read > The Yield Curve Inverts: Time to Hunker Down?

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Don’t Cry for Me, Argentina

On Sunday, August 11th, Argentina’s current president since 2015, Mauricio Macri, lost the Argentine presidential primary election by a much greater margin than expected. This development was a surprise to the markets that sent shockwaves through emerging markets asset classes. Macri’s loss seriously reduces his chances of reelection on October 27th, as this primary election was generally viewed as a referendum on Macri’s austerity measures and reforms. Macri is seeking reelection on a platform that commits to continued austerity if he were to be reelected.

In this newsletter, we explore the impact these developments have had on the markets, potential outcomes, and what to watch for going forward.

Read > Don’t Cry for Me, Argentina

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Lower for Longer, or Negative Forever?

With Trump’s surprise announcement of additional tariffs at the beginning of this month — a day after the Fed’s rate cut — the yield curve continued its free fall and flattening that began in earnest at the beginning of 4Q18’s dislocation and the gradual heating-up of the tariff war. Sunday’s Argentine Presidential primary election surprise, where pro-free markets incumbent Macri lost to populist duo Fernandez/Kirchner by a wider than expected margin, further exacerbated that trend.

In this newsletter, we examine the driving forces behind this persistent yield curve decline and flattening and potential remedies to the “lower for longer” norm.

Read > Lower for Longer, or Negative Forever?

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

August Off to a Difficult Start

Since peaking late in the third quarter of 2018, U.S. equities have experienced large swings in performance. Following the worst December performance since 1931, the S&P 500 staged a dramatic rebound logging its best quarterly return since the first quarter of 1998. Equities continued their march higher culminating with the S&P 500 reaching an all-time closing high of 3,025.86 on Friday, July 26th. The year-to-date rally is attributable to a multitude of factors, however, a dovish pivot by the Fed and optimism around U.S.-China trade relations were key macro drivers facilitating the rebound.

However, fortunes quickly changed last week as the S&P 500 logged its worst weekly performance so far this year with a 3.1% drop and the sell-off continued into Monday with a steep one-day drop of 3%. Recent market volatility centers around changing expectations with respect to the economic outlook, market participants reconciling a smaller rate cut than was priced in, and an escalation in the trade war with China. U.S. officials had hinted throughout the year that a deal was close ­— and progress was being made — however that trade deal optimism is now in doubt. An additional 10% tariff on $300 billion worth of Chinese goods was announced last week and is set to take effect on September 1st. China retaliated by telling its state-owned companies to suspend U.S. agricultural imports and allowing its currency to fall to decade lows against the U.S. dollar.

Volatility is likely to stay elevated over the near-term as the economic and trade outlooks remain uncertain. Historically, August is a volatile month and on average the third quarter produces muted returns. It is worth noting that the S&P 500 still has a double-digit year-to-date return and is trading nearly 5% below all-time highs; whether or not the index remains in positive territory for the duration of 2019 will no doubt depend at least partly on how the U.S.-China trade issues play out over the next 5 months.

Print PDF > August Off to a Difficult Start

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

The Fed’s First Post-Recession Economic Stimulus

The Federal Reserve’s two central aims are to keep unemployment below a 5% threshold and inflation near a 2% constant. This week’s chart looks at how the Federal Reserve addressed these aims as they cut interest rates on Wednesday, July 31st, 2019, for the first time since the 2008 Financial Crisis from a fed funds target rate of 2.25%–2.5% to 2.0%–2.25%. This well-telegraphed and long-expected 25 basis point cut signals a shift in the Fed’s monetary policy towards one of dovish1 stimulus after a period of hawkishness from 2015 to 2018 that saw the Fed raise the fed funds target rate nine times from 0–0.25% to 2.25%–2.5%. In conjunction with this rate cut, the Fed also halted the run-off of their balance sheet by restarting their reinvestment in government bonds, effectively infusing more cash into the economy to provide further support.

As shown in the chart, this latest interest rate cut occurs with unemployment well below their 5% threshold — which by itself shows that stimulus is not necessary, while inflation is lower than their 2% target — which by itself shows that some stimulus would not hurt. The reasons for the Fed’s cut include a persistently slow global economy, weak business earnings environment, high U.S. rates relative to low and negative rates2 set by other central banks, the fact that low unemployment has not been driving inflation higher, and potential threats to global growth including Brexit and the tariff escalation between the U.S. and several countries, such as China.

For more information, please reference our full newsletter on the topic.

Print > The Fed’s First Post-Recession Economic Stimulus

1 Dovishness is a term used to describe central banks and central bankers who want to provide economic stimulus to keep unemployment low by reducing interest rates, which makes it easier for businesses to borrow and therefore hire people because of greater economic activity. This is in contrast with hawkishness, which describes central banks and central bankers who want to slow the economy down in order to contain inflation by raising interest rates, which makes it tougher for businesses to borrow and therefore restrains prices because of less economic activity.
2 Negative interest rates have recently become more prevalent among German and Japanese short term bonds as those economies continue to languish and their governments continue to provide more stimulus.

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Stoking the Fire: The First Post-Recession Rate Cut

On July 31, 2019, the Federal Reserve cut interest rates for the first time since the 2008 Financial Crisis from a fed funds target rate of 2.25%–2.5% to 2%–2.25%. This well-telegraphed and long-expected 25 basis point cut, roughly 11 years after their last cut in December of 2008, signals a shift in the Fed’s monetary policy towards one of dovish stimulus after a period of hawkishness from 2015 to 2018 that saw the Fed raise the fed funds target rate nine times from 0–0.25% to 2.25%–2.5%.

This newsletter examines the reasons behind and the initial and potential reactions to the latest interest rate cut, including a look at unemployment, inflation, and the yield curve.

Read > Stoking the Fire: The First Post-Recession Rate Cut

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Venture Capital Benefits from Mega IPOs

The first half of 2019 has produced a number of high profile IPOs including Uber, Slack, Pinterest, Zoom, Beyond Meat, and Lyft. These IPOs have made it a very successful year for U.S. venture capital exits. While the absolute number of exits has remained slightly below the pace of recent years, this year’s exits have been larger, generating nearly $190 billion through the first half of 2019. This year’s second-quarter exit value alone has exceeded the annual amounts for the venture industry going back to 2006. IPOs have accounted for nearly 83% of the cumulative exit value so far in 2019.

This strong exit environment is likely to allow U.S. venture capital to repeat 2018 as the strongest area of performance within the broadly defined private equity market. While we expect the first quarter to provide strong returns, the second quarter is where we will see a significant increase in performance as IPO offerings ramped up in the spring/early summer. With a robust remaining pipeline of potential IPOs scheduled for the second half of 2019 and 2020 including Airbnb, Palantir, Robinhood, Postmates, and WeWork, we do not see this market cooling off much in the near-term. Regardless of which of these remaining high profile IPOs materialize this year, 2019 is likely to be remembered by investors as the year of mega IPOs.

Print PDF > Venture Capital Benefits From Mega IPOs

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Second Quarter Review of Asset Allocation: Risks and Opportunities

Overall, the second quarter was positive for financial markets, thanks to strong economic fundamentals and expected Fed stimulus. Unemployment remains low at 3.7% and inflation (1.8% year over year) is near the Fed’s long-term target of 2%. However, there are increasing concerns about a global economic slowdown and early forecasts for 2Q GDP growth are around 1.5%, far lower than what we’ve seen in recent quarters. Globally, the most important trends we see are the following:

  • The U.S.-China trade conflict remains ongoing as talks between the two countries resumed, but little progress has been made;
  • The Federal Reserve is expected to cut rates in July and markets are forecasting another one to two cuts by the end of the year;
  • Business sentiment is declining ­— most notably in the PMI manufacturing index, which is now dangerously close to falling below its growth threshold;
  • Britain continues to struggle with its Brexit and elected a new PM (Boris Johnson) on July 23rd;
  • China and Europe are expected in increase their stimulus measures to combat slow growth and overall global uncertainty;
  • Late-cycle dynamics in credit and equity markets.

The impact of these trends is explored further in this newsletter as we review second-quarter performance and expectations going forward for each of the major asset classes.

Read > Second Quarter Review of Asset Allocation: Risks and Opportunities

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Boris Johnson Wins Tory Leadership

It’s official. At approximately 12:05 p.m. BST and after a six-week political race, the front-runner, Boris Johnson, won the Conservative Party contest to be the next Tory leader and succeed Theresa May as British prime minister. With the promise of delivering Brexit by October 31st, “come what may,” Johnson trounced his opponent, U.K. Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt, garnering more than 66% of the roughly 160,000 votes.

This newsletter outlines the potential effects of Boris Johnson’s election, including Brexit fears, market reaction, and its impact on the U.K. government and economy.

Read > Boris Johnson Wins Tory Leadership

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Real Estate: Where Do We Go From Here?

Over the last ten years, core real estate as measured by the NFI-ODCE has delivered an annualized return of almost 9% and has helped boost institutional portfolio returns. However, given the consensus view that we are in the late stage of the economic cycle, coupled with overall global uncertainty and moderating returns in the asset class, investors are wondering if it is time to reduce their allocation to real estate, and if so, where they should allocate these funds.

The following article strives to answer these questions by analyzing the current landscape for real estate investments, including opportunities outside of the traditional “core” strategies that have historically constituted the majority of real estate investments for our clients. Furthermore, we offer guidance on where to allocate assets outside of the real estate asset class if investors have built up overweights to the asset class over the last decade of outperformance.

Read > Real Estate: Where Do We Go From Here?

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.