Category: Chart of the Week

Feeling the Squeeze

As investors and economists meticulously analyze data to predict future actions of the Federal Reserve, the domestic economy has maintained resiliency thanks in part to robust consumer spending in recent months. That said, challenges exist for the American public, including the fact that consumer interest payments now constitute an increasing proportion of U.S. household incomes. According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, this figure, which excludes payments related to mortgage debt, reached 4.3% as of the most recent report published on July 31. Incidentally, this marks the highest level observed since 2008 during the Global Financial Crisis.

To this point, U.S. households have managed to withstand these increases in debt servicing payments while simultaneously confronting elevated levels of inflation. However, there are warning signs that this resilience may not be sustainable, particularly among lower-income households that have depleted robust savings amassed during the pandemic. One indication that households are beginning to feel financially squeezed is the fact that delinquency rates have escalated over the last few quarters. According to the Federal Reserve, new 30+ day delinquency rates for consumer credit card debt and auto loans have spiked since bottoming out in late 2021, reaching 7.2% and 7.3%, respectively, as of June 30. While current rates of delinquency remain well below those observed in the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis, both figures now exceed pre-pandemic levels and may be poised to continue rising.

There is also another challenge with which millions of citizens must now grapple — the resumption of student loan payments, which were reinstated earlier this month. Given this new reality, the proportion of total interest payments relative to household income will almost certainly increase, which may lead some consumers to rely more heavily on credit cards to maintain current spending levels. This type of waning consumer strength would likely have significant ramifications for securities markets and the broader economy, and Marquette will continue to monitor indicators related to these dynamics as we head into the fall.

Print PDF > Feeling the Squeeze

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

CHIPS Ahoy!

The U.S. Department of Commerce recently celebrated the one-year anniversary of the CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law on August 9, 2022. This federal statute provides nearly $280 billion in new funding and is aimed at boosting domestic research and manufacturing within the semiconductor sector. Additional goals of the statute include increasing onshore manufacturing jobs, bolstering domestic supply chains, and improving the positioning of the United States within the global semiconductor space. Specifically, the CHIPS and Science Act provides over $52 billion for U.S. semiconductor research, development, and workforce enhancement, including $39 billion in manufacturing incentives and $13 billion for research. Also included within the statute is a 25% investment tax credit for capital expenses related to the manufacturing of semiconductors and similar equipment.

U.S. Census Bureau data on private manufacturing construction spending by industry can be analyzed to help determine the effects of the CHIPS and Science Act on business activity. To that point, over the last decade, private manufacturing construction spending in the computer, electronic, and electrical industries (“CEE”) represented less than 15% of total domestic manufacturing construction spending. However, spending on CEE-related manufacturing construction increased significantly within the last 12 months, surging to more than $110 billion at the end of July. This spike in spending represents an increase of roughly 125% over the last year, and CEE expenditures now account for more than 55% of total private manufacturing construction outlays in the United States.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the return of the S&P 500 Semiconductor & Equipment index is significantly in excess of that of the broader S&P 500 index since the CHIPS and Science Act was passed (53.7% vs. 13.3% for the trailing 12-month period ending July 31). While a portion of this rally can be attributed to optimism surrounding the prospects of artificial intelligence, the increase in manufacturing spending detailed above has also been a material tailwind for semiconductor companies and those in related industries. Additionally, the fact that the statute contained a clause that prevents companies from using taxpayer money to repurchase stock or issue dividend payments suggests that the majority of recent gains within the semiconductor space reflect organic growth. The sector could be poised for continued strong performance given the importance of semiconductors across the globe, however, investors should weigh any potential benefits offered by the space against risks which include increasingly lofty valuations.

Where’s the (Affordable) Beef?

Readers who have recently shopped for Labor Day barbeque supplies may lament the fact that beef prices have climbed to extreme levels. This sharp increase in the cost of beef is in part thanks to an elevated price of corn, which, as the primary feed source for cattle, is a key input in the beef manufacturing process. Due to this relationship, the two prices have moved in a highly correlated matter over the last few decades, albeit with a lag. For instance, corn prices rose from roughly $2 per bushel in 2000 to over $8 per bushel in 2012 as ethanol usage became more prevalent during that time. Live cattle futures increased by roughly 70% over that same interval and kept climbing to nearly $1.70 per pound before tapering off in 2014.

The lagged nature of this relationship is attributable to beef market dynamics. Specifically, when corn prices increase, beef producers first try to pass these higher input costs on to consumers. However, this can only be accomplished to a limited extent before the margins of producers begin to come under pressure. At that point, farmers are forced to cull their herds to reduce the supply of beef, raise prices, and protect margins. Since it takes an extended period of time to rebuild herds, beef prices often moderate over several years after the initial reversion of input prices back to normal levels.

After the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, corn prices skyrocketed due to various shocks, including a spike in demand from ethanol producers and a fertilizer shortage that increased production costs. The invasion of Ukraine further boosted the price of the commodity given the nation’s status as the fourth-largest corn exporter in the world, accounting for roughly 15% of the global corn trade. After increasing by more than 110% since the start of 2020, corn prices peaked in July of last year at roughly $8.20 per bushel. Perhaps unsurprisingly, these dynamics have led to a commensurate rise in the cost of beef in recent years, with prices rising from less than $1 per pound at the beginning of the pandemic to an all-time high of over $1.80 per pound today.

The good news is that it does appear that corn prices have started to moderate, falling by roughly 42% since last summer. That said, it will likely take a few years for beef prices to fully reverse course due to the factors detailed above. Until that time, grillmasters everywhere may need to find more cost-effective ingredients to use during their cookouts.

Print PDF > Where’s the (Affordable) Beef?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Brazil Eases Into the Fall

On August 2, Brazil’s central bank cut its benchmark interest rate by 50 basis points, from 13.75% to 13.25%. This marks the country’s first rate cut in over three years and is in stark contrast to moves made by Brazilian policymakers in recent time. To that point, between February 2021 and July 2022, Brazil increased its key rate from 2.00% to 13.75%, representing the most aggressive monetary tightening by any central bank during this period. The August cut was made possible by a moderate domestic inflation rate of 3.2%, which sits well below the country’s post-pandemic peak of 12.1% exhibited in April of last year. Brazilian authorities have indicated that additional cuts are likely in the near future, thanks in large part to an improving consumer price outlook and longer-term inflation expectations that continue to fall. These dynamics place the country ahead of much of the globe when it comes to the cycle of interest rates, as many nations, particularly those in the developed world, continue to fight elevated inflation via restrictive monetary policy. Alternatively, other Latin American countries like Chile, Mexico, and Peru have either lowered rates in recent time or are expected to embark on easing campaigns within the coming months.

As it relates to performance, Brazilian equities have been a bright spot within the emerging markets space in 2023 and have significantly outpaced the MSCI EM index on a year-to-date basis through the end of July (22.6% vs. 11.4%). Expectations of a shift in monetary policy which has now come to fruition, coupled with better-than-expected fiscal and political outlooks, have boosted sentiment and helped fuel these strong returns. Should monetary conditions continue to ease, Brazil and its Latin American peers may continue to provide an attractive opportunity set for investors going forward.

Revisiting the Banking Industry

Though the regional banking turmoil that surfaced in March has largely faded into the background, Moody’s brought focus back to the sector last week when the rating agency downgraded 10 regional banks one notch (all remain investment grade). Moody’s also placed six larger lenders under review for a potential downgrade and cut the outlook for another 11 banks from stable to negative, indicating their ratings could be downgraded in the future. The rating agency cited interest rate and asset-liability management risks, as well as growing profitability pressures and expectations for a mild U.S. recession in early 2024 as reasons for these changes. Similar to Fitch’s downgrade of U.S. credit the week prior, the timing of these moves is being critiqued as deposit flows have generally stabilized since March, the Federal Reserve is likely at or near peak rates, and a soft landing appears increasingly likely.

Bank stocks pulled back modestly on the news, after notably outperforming the broader market in July. From here, a number of moving pieces remain at play. These include sensitivity of the banking industry to commercial real estate issues, tighter lending standards, and potentially higher-for-longer rates, though it is important to note that overall credit quality remains strong and the banking system remains well capitalized. Though the Moody’s downgrades may have little practical impact, they do serve as a reminder — especially after the strong performance of equities since the start of the year — that a number of uncertainties remain and, therefore, market volatility along with elevated dispersion could likely continue for the remainder of 2023.

Print PDF > Revisiting the Banking Industry

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Honey, I Shrunk the Money Supply

M2 money supply, as defined by the Federal Reserve, includes M1 (currency and coins held by the non-bank public, checkable deposits, and travelers’ checks) plus savings deposits (including money market deposit accounts), small time deposits under $100,000, and shares in retail money market mutual funds. M2 rapidly increased throughout 2020 and 2021 amid COVID-related monetary stimulus, to a peak of almost $22 trillion in July 2022. As the economy reopened and inflation accelerated — with headline CPI hitting a peak of 9% year-over-year in June 2022 — the Fed responded with a series of rate hikes and quantitative tightening measures. The result has been a rapid decrease in the money supply, with M2 down 3.6% year-over-year as of June 2023. The effects of the swift reduction in M2 have likely only begun to be felt, but a continued contraction — facilitated by higher-for-longer rates and continued quantitative tightening — could help cool inflation further and contribute to a soft landing for the economy.

Print PDF > Honey, I Shrunk the Money Supply

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

When the Bill Comes Due

The U.S. economy has proved more resilient than expected this year, buoyed by ongoing consumer strength. Labor market dynamics and pandemic-era savings have allowed consumers to continue to spend despite higher costs. Those excess savings, however, are projected to be fully depleted by the fourth quarter. On top of that, millions of Americans will soon have another monthly charge to factor into budgets, as student loan payments are set to resume in October for the first time in years.
Collectively, U.S. consumers owe $1.6 trillion in education debt, with monthly payments averaging $200–$300. The CARES Act put student loan payments on hold in 2020, saving consumers approximately $185 billion over the last three years.¹

Moreover, the pause in payments brought delinquency rates to historic lows, which helped improve borrowers’ credit scores, enabling them to take on additional debt. As a result, some consumers are now facing greater obligations that may detract from spending on goods and services. Apollo Global Management estimates that student loan payments alone could reduce consumer spending — which makes up two-thirds of U.S. GDP — by more than $100 billion per year. Whether the U.S. tips into recession remains to be seen, but evolving dynamics like the depletion of excess savings and the resumption of student loan payments could change current trajectories. We will continue to watch these factors and their impact on the macroeconomic outlook closely.

Print PDF > When the Bill Comes Due

¹Goldman Sachs via The New York Times, Student Loan Pause is Ending, With Consequences for Economy

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Emerging Opportunities Beyond China

Equity performance in China, with the MSCI China Index down 5.5% through the first half of the year, has disappointed amid hopes for a strong post-COVID recovery. While macro data started the year strong, momentum quickly waned, with a cautious consumer and a slowdown in manufacturing. China’s property sector troubles have continued, and U.S./China tensions remain, with the U.S. moving toward stricter regulation and reduced investment in the Chinese technology sector in 2024. Along with human rights concerns and the general unpredictability of the Chinese government, the debate around China’s investability continues on.

Take China out of the emerging markets picture, however, and the story is different. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index excluding China — the largest single country weight in the index at nearly 30%¹ — has outperformed the broader benchmark since late 2021. Latin American countries like Brazil and Mexico — almost 6% and 3% weights in the index, respectively — have benefited from central banks that began their monetary policy tightening cycle earlier. Additionally, as renewable energy trends continue, Latin American regions rich in natural resources should see exports grow. Nearshoring trends have also benefitted emerging market countries such as Taiwan — the second largest country weight in the index at nearly 16% — and Mexico, with the latter exporting nearly as much to the U.S. as China, something not seen since 2003. And in India — the third largest country weighting in the MSCI EM Index at approximately 15% — government reform programs have drawn in significant investor flows.

Looking into the second half of the year, the evolving macro picture in China, including any potential stimulus, will continue to be a driving factor of overall MSCI EM performance. And outside of China, there are a number of interesting trends playing out across the emerging markets space that should present investment opportunities for active managers.

 

¹All country weights as of June 30, 2023

The FTC vs. M&A

Higher interest rates have broadly impacted capital markets, including M&A deal flow given the significant increase in financing costs. Along with that, elevated regulatory risk has been another headwind for the space.

Since her appointment as Chair of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in June 2021, Lina Khan has emerged as one of the most aggressive anti-trust leaders the U.S. and Wall Street have seen in some time. For large corporations seeking growth via M&A, the regulatory requirements for FTC approval have increased significantly. Deals that would likely have been approved with ease in prior administrations now face costly lawsuits, injunctions, and other challenges by the Commission. Coupled with higher financing costs, the FTC’s aggressive agenda has significantly prolonged the timeline for deals to close. In the second quarter of 2023, completed M&A deal volumes came in at mere $95 billion, just above the $83 billion of deals closed at the height of COVID in the second quarter 2022. At the same time, the volume of pending deals awaiting regulatory approval has substantially increased, reaching $183 billion in the second quarter.

The FTC’s actions have had a clear impact on the M&A environment, leading to significantly wider deal spreads in 2023 amid increased uncertainty. This is both an opportunity and a risk for hedge funds specializing in merger arbitrage. While deal spreads appear attractive, they come with heightened risks that require expertise to successfully navigate. For investors, selecting experienced managers with a proven track record of success across different regulatory regimes is critical to achieving favorable risk-adjusted returns.

Print PDF > The FTC vs. M&A

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Credit Trash is Return Treasure

“One man’s trash is another man’s treasure” may be a cliché, but it has never been more applicable to the below-investment grade, or junk, market. As the macroeconomic backdrop has proven to be more resilient than investors feared heading into 2023, one of the primary beneficiaries has been CCC corporates — traditionally the riskiest securities within the high yield and leveraged loan markets. CCC bonds and loans are the least credit-worthy within their respective markets and tend to perform poorly in periods of economic stress. With the economy so far avoiding recession, this segment of the market has posted significant gains year-to-date. CCC bonds and loans were up 11.0% and 8.3% through the first half, respectively, notably outperforming the broader high yield and leveraged loan indices, up 5.8% and 6.3%, and especially the highest-rated, or BB, segments of each market, up 4.5% and 4.6%, respectively.

On top of better-than-feared macroeconomic conditions, other factors have contributed to the junk rally in these markets. Leveraged credit balance sheets, even amongst the lowest-rated issuers, remain well positioned to weather headwinds. High yield issuer leverage is at a 10-year low while leveraged loan issuer leverage levels are at multi-year lows with interest coverage metrics slightly below all-time highs. Defaults are expected to increase, though only to the long-term average of the asset class, assuaging fears of a wave of defaults. Additionally, market technicals have helped fuel this rally as issuance has remained light, causing what supply is out there to benefit from a continual bid due to the elevated yield on these securities. All of this said, CCCs are still typically the riskiest part of the fixed income market, and continued performance hinges on the notoriously-unpredictable economy.

Print PDF > Credit Trash is Return Treasure

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.