Checking in on Bitcoin’s Fair Value

March 27, 2025 | Nic Solecki, CBDA, Research Analyst

In May of 2024, we published a Chart of the Week titled “Is Bitcoin Fairly Valued?” At the time, bitcoin and the broader digital asset space demonstrated mixed performance amid heightened market volatility, shifting liquidity conditions, and geoeconomic uncertainty. Recognizing the challenges in determining bitcoin’s fair value, we applied standard valuation principles to estimate bitcoin’s fundamental value at that time. While bitcoin and the broader digital asset space have once again exhibited mixed performance amid a shifting macroeconomic backdrop, much has changed over the last year and recent developments suggest that a reassessment of bitcoin’s fair value could be timely.

To better understand why this reassessment could be relevant for institutional investors, here is a brief and non-exhaustive recap of the key developments in the U.S. crypto space this year:

  • On January 23, the Trump administration issued Executive Order (EO) 14178, Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology, signaling a new approach to digital assets and revoking the frameworks and directives established by the Biden administration.
      • Within 180 days, the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets, currently chaired by David Sacks, will evaluate and recommend proposals for a federal framework to govern the issuance and operation of digital assets.
  • On February 5, FDIC Acting Chair Travis Hill and Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman released statements signaling the ongoing reassessment of their organizations’ postures toward the crypto industry — sentiments echoed in recent weeks by officials from the Treasury, DOJ, and SEC.
  • On March 6, President Trump signed the EO to establish a U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and a separate Digital Asset Stockpile; both to be administered and maintained by the Department of the Treasury.
      • Both are to be initially funded with assets seized or forfeited in criminal and civil cases.
      • Without further executive or legislative action, additional Stockpile assets can only be acquired through forfeiture proceedings and civil money penalties imposed by a government agency.
    The Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Commerce may develop budget-neutral strategies for acquiring additional bitcoin.
  • As of March 24, 20 states have active legislation advancing the establishment of digital asset reserve funds or diversification of existing public funds with prominent digital assets — with some proposals specifying potential allocations up to 10% of fund assets.

Unsurprisingly, crypto markets responded enthusiastically to the news. By the end of January, the MVDA 10 Index and the MSCI Global Digital Asset Index were both up roughly 10% as bitcoin traded north of $100,000. Then, February arrived, bringing a notable shift in broad market sentiment and volatility, causing digital asset prices to fall alongside public equities. By the end of February, bitcoin was down roughly 18% while some broad crypto indices were down as much as 28%. So where does bitcoin currently stand?

Applying the discounted cash flow (DCF) method used in our prior analysis, bitcoin’s fair relative value range¹ is illustrated above in light teal, with its upper and lower bounds highlighted, respectively, in orange and green. While bitcoin appears to have closed February at undervalued levels, as of March 24, bitcoin appears to be slightly below and advancing toward its fair value range. That said, it is important to clarify that this point-in-time DCF method is just one of several potential valuation approaches, and other estimates may vary. Valuations for both floating fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies are dynamic, constantly adjusting to inflation, nominal yields, and broader macroeconomic conditions. Going forward, future inflation trends and market dynamics will provide further opportunities to validate this fundamental approach.

1The discounted terminal values of bitcoin are based on a discounted cash flow model that incorporates U.S. Treasury yields, inflation rates, and imputed risk premiums. 

Print PDF

Nic Solecki, CBDA
Research Analyst

Get to Know Nic

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Related Content

Dual-axis line chart comparing LBO/M&A/Recapitalization Activity, its average level, and the SOFR (90-Day) rate from 3Q18 through 2Q26. LBO/M&A/Recapitalization Activity ranges from approximately $0 billion to $100 billion, while SOFR ranges from 0% to approximately 5%. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

09.21.2026

Let’s Make a Deal

For much of the past several years, the conventional view has been that higher interest rates and stretched valuations would…

Line chart comparing annualized return and annualized risk for stock-bond portfolio combinations from 1976-2019 and 2020-2026. Two lines show the range of return and risk outcomes across portfolio allocations during each period. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

09.14.2026

No More Free Lunch?

There are many great things about working at Marquette Associates, but “Free Lunch Tuesday” is right at the top of…

Combination stacked column and line chart comparing EMD fund flows (columns) and index cumulative returns (lines), June 2024 to present. Indices used: JPM EMBI GD Index and JPM GBI EM GD Index. Since May 2025, Monthly Flows have been positive, with the exception of March 2026. Most recent datapoint: July 31, 2026 Hard Currency Flows $1.2B, Local Currency $1.6B, JPM EMBI GD Index at 21.2%, JPM GBI EM GD Index at 23.1%. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

09.08.2026

EMD’s Second Chance?

Over the last several years, emerging market debt (EMD) has faced several headwinds, with rising yields across other fixed income…

Combination stacked column and line chart showing U.S. Buyout (private equity) Net Asset Value holding periods, 2011 to 2025. Column categories include holding periods

08.31.2026

Zombie, Inc.

Private equity has always had a few portfolio companies that refused to leave the party. Today, however, the industry appears…

Five-line chart comparing yield on 30-year debt instrument for the United States, United Kingdon, France, Germany, and Japan, December 2021 to August 21, 2026. First data point in order listed previously: 1.9%, 1.1%, 0.9%, 0.2%, 0.7%. Most recent: 5.3%, 5.8%, 4.9%, 3.8%, 4.1%. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

08.24.2026

Long Weakened

The global bond market is facing renewed pressure as investors demand higher yields to hold long-dated government debt, pushing borrowing…

Column chart showing total deal size for 14 non-financial corporate bond deals of $20B or more since the start of 2025. Out of 14, only three were unrelated to AI or hyperscalers. For full dataset, please contact marquettemarketing@marquetteassociates.com.

08.17.2026

Supersize Me!

As a college football player struggling to put on mass, the “supersizing” deal at McDonald’s was hard to beat. For…

More articles

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Research alerts keep you updated on our latest research publications. Simply enter your contact information, choose the research alerts you would like to receive and click Subscribe. Alerts will be sent as research is published.

We respect your privacy. We will never share or sell your information.

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.

If you have questions or need further information, please contact us directly and we will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us >