Topic Tags: International Economy

First to Cut: The Fed or the ECB?

Based on implied probabilities derived from options markets, investors are currently forecasting an 82% chance that the European Central Bank will cut its policy rate at or before its June meeting. For the full year, market participants currently expect roughly three rate cuts by the ECB in total. By comparison, investors believe there is only a 46% chance the Federal Reserve will lower its policy rate in or before June and are now expecting fewer than two rate cuts from the U.S. central bank over the course of the full year.

Some of the primary reasons for these expectations involve both economic growth and inflation. To that point, in the fourth quarter of 2023, the U.S. economy grew 5.9% on a year-over-year basis. This is in stark contrast to the euro area, which produced 0.0% year-over-year growth for that same period. Estimates for first quarter GDP growth tell a similar story in terms of divergence between the two regions, as the U.S. economy continues to perform well due to a strong labor market and a resilient domestic consumer. On the inflation front, both regions have seen price levels fall from peaks seen in 2022, though European inflation has proved less sticky than that of the U.S. Specifically, the March reading for domestic CPI was 3.5%, which came in above both consensus expectations and the 2.4% figure for the euro area. In short, as it relates to monetary policy expectations, lower levels of economic growth call for more supportive monetary policy, and lower levels of inflation allow for such policy. Should current forecasts related to the trajectory of interest rates come to fruition, the U.S. dollar is likely to benefit relative to the euro, which may create a short-term headwind for non-U.S. equity returns. However, more accommodative monetary policy by the ECB may also serve as a medium-term tailwind for international stocks should the move result in stronger economic growth for the European continent.

Sweet and High Up

Chocolate eggs and bunnies may have appeared more expensive to shoppers this Easter weekend, as the price of cocoa futures has surged by around 125% since the beginning of 2024. New York futures prices saw a roughly 50% increase in the month of March alone and now sit at an all-time high of just below $10,000 per metric ton. By comparison, copper futures prices sat at approximately $8,900 per metric ton as of this writing, meaning cocoa is currently more expensive than the bellwether industrial metal.

The drivers of this dramatic increase in cocoa prices involve difficulties faced by the two biggest growers of the commodity: Ivory Coast and Ghana. Specifically, both nations have seen production hampered by strong seasonal winds and a lack of rainfall, as well as a prevalent disease known as swollen shoot virus, which serves to kill cocoa trees and leads to a drop in yields. To make matters worse, the Ghana Cocoa Board, which depends on foreign financing to compensate domestic farmers, may soon lose access to a critical funding facility due to a lack of beans. Due to these challenges, experts currently expect cocoa production shortfalls ranging from 150,000 to 500,000 tons over the next few seasons.

As readers might imagine, these dynamics are creating turmoil within futures markets. Investors with short positions have been forced to either manage margin calls or purchase contracts to close out their shorts, which can exacerbate price action. Pain has not been limited to futures market participants, as consumers have been forced to stomach chocolate prices that have climbed by roughly 10% over the last year. Additionally, it is possible that more shelf price increases are on the way, as producers of chocolate often hedge their purchases of cocoa months in advance. All of this said, it is unlikely that these developments will have a material impact on capital markets broadly. In other words, a diversified portfolio is one of the best ways for investors to keep their returns sweet!

A Tale of Two Emerging Markets

While Chinese equities have largely languished in recent time amid robust performance of Indian stocks, it is important to note that these dynamics were quite different just a few years ago. To that point, the MSCI China Index outperformed its Indian counterpart by roughly 45% on a cumulative total return basis between 2016 and 2020. During that period, global investors were optimistic about the growth prospects of many Chinese companies and benefitted from an expanded opportunity set given the addition of local market shares to the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Chinese stocks grew to comprise nearly 40% of the benchmark at the end of 2020 as a result of these developments, which caused many market participants to wonder if China should still be considered an emerging country.

As most readers are likely aware, these trends have shifted dramatically in the last few years. Since the start of 2021, the MSCI China Index is down roughly 50%, as the country has presented investors with myriad headwinds including changes to the regulatory environment, increased government debt, a challenged property sector, heightened geopolitical tensions, and a weaker-than-expected post-pandemic economic recovery. In contrast, the MSCI India Index has returned more than 60% on a cumulative basis over the last four years. Market participants have been drawn to India due to its strong structural growth story which centers on favorable demographics, government reforms, and robust economic expansion. As a result of increased investor attention and equity market appreciation, the weight of Indian equities within the EM benchmark has roughly doubled since 2016. Going forward, continued growth may push Indian equities higher, though many investment managers are now becoming wary of current valuations. Many Chinese stocks, on the other hand, are trading at historically low multiples and facing extreme levels of negative sentiment. These dynamics could lead to a reversal of the trends outlined above in the near term.

As it relates to investing in emerging countries, it is important to highlight the need for patience and diversification given the variability of returns associated with the asset class when compared to most developed markets. Investors should also consider the use of actively managed strategies within the space due to return dispersion and the demonstrated ability of most managers to beat the MSCI Emerging Markets Index over long periods of time. Marquette will continue to source best-in-class managers within the asset class, monitor performance trends, and provide recommendations to clients accordingly.

2024 Market Preview Video

This video is a recording of a live webinar held January 25 by Marquette’s research team analyzing 2023 across the economy and various asset classes as well as what trends and themes we’ll be monitoring in the year ahead.

Our quarterly Market Insights series examines the primary asset classes we cover for clients including the U.S. economy, fixed income, U.S. and non-U.S. equities, hedge funds, real assets, and private markets, with commentary by our research analysts and directors.

Sign up for research alerts to be invited to future webinars and notified when we publish new videos. If you have any questions, please send us an email.

2024 Market Preview: A 40 Degree Day

A former colleague once described his brother-in-law to me as a “40 degree day.” The puzzled look on my face revealed my unfamiliarity with the term, so he went on to ask me: “When does anyone get upset about a 40 degree day?” I laughed and shook my head — it was genius, the perfect way to describe something more forgettable than memorable…not especially good or bad, just average.

Given what markets have been through over the last four years — COVID, outsized returns both good and bad, record inflation, sky-rocketing interest rates, geopolitical conflict, and elevated volatility — I know I’m not alone in hoping that 2024 market returns will resemble a 40 degree day. Indeed, an “average” year of returns across markets will equate to positive portfolio performance for most asset allocations and allow investors to satisfy their risk and return goals.

Of course, there are potential stumbling blocks to a “normal” year. In particular, we will closely watch the Fed pivot and the disparity between expected and actual rate cuts, geopolitical conflicts, and the U.S. presidential election.

With that as background, we offer our annual outlook across asset classes, highlighting trends and themes for the year ahead. Happy reading and here’s to a year of normalcy!

Many Happy Returns: A Look Back at 2023

After a challenging 2022, during which significant drawdowns were exhibited by equity and fixed income indices alike, last year saw resurgent performance from most areas of the public market landscape. U.S. stocks were higher in 2023, with the S&P 500 and Russell 2000 indices posting returns of 26.3% and 16.9%, respectively, during the year. Key themes within domestic equity markets in 2023 included increased investor interest in GLP-1 obesity drugs, which led to strong performance from large-cap healthcare companies like Eli Lilly, as well as advances within the field of artificial intelligence. These advances resulted in narrow market leadership for much of 2023 and helped fuel a strong 42.7% calendar year return for the Russell 1000 Growth Index, which is home to each of the “Magnificent Seven” companies (Amazon, Apple, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla) that were ultimately some of the largest beneficiaries of AI-related fervor. Some may have expressed skepticism that U.S. equity markets would exhibit such robust calendar year returns in March of 2023, which saw a banking crisis that led to the shuttering of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic Bank amid an aggressive monetary tightening campaign by the Federal Reserve and widespread runs on deposits. Fortunately, concerns about broader contagion were allayed when the Fed announced plans to protect uninsured deposits at the affected institutions, though performance of mid- and small-cap indices did suffer due to these events.

Non-U.S. equities posted gains in 2023 as well, with the MSCI EAFE and EAFE Small-Cap indices, which track developed market stocks, returning 18.2% and 13.2%, respectively. UK stocks, while still positive for the year, lagged the broad market due to economic stagnation and higher borrowing costs. Japanese equities, on the other hand, served as a bright spot within the developed market space given recent shareholder-friendly corporate governance reforms and monetary policy that continues to be accommodative. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index was positive for the year as well, notching a return of 9.8%. Companies domiciled in Latin American countries like Brazil and Mexico were some of the largest gainers within non-U.S. markets during the year, as many have benefited from a reconfiguration of global supply chains and favorable population demographics. Additionally, the Taiwanese company TSMC, which is the largest constituent of the MSCI EM Index, exhibited strong performance in 2023 thanks to the enthusiasm surrounding AI advances detailed above. Despite these positive outcomes, the 2023 return of the EM benchmark was hampered due to continued challenges faced by China, which was among the worst performing countries during the period. Indeed, a slump in its property sector, ongoing geopolitical issues, a weak job market, and widespread debt stress in the corporate space have spelled trouble for China’s economy in recent time, however, many believe the nation’s slowdown has bottomed.

Fixed income indices were also positive in 2023 after a dismal 2022, with falling inflation, a resilient economy, and expectations of interest rate cuts on the horizon leading to a bond market rally to end the year. To that point, the yield on the 10-year Treasury, which sat above 5.0% less than three months ago, has now dropped to below 3.9%. Thanks in part to these dynamics, the Bloomberg Aggregate Index notched a return of 5.5% in 2023, while high yield bonds (+13.4%) and bank loans (+13.0%) posted their best calendar year performance figures since 2019 and 2009, respectively.

It is important to note that private markets asset classes, including private equity and real estate, report performance on a lagged basis, meaning full calendar year returns for these spaces will not be available for some time. In the coming weeks, Marquette will be providing more detailed analysis related to both public and private market performance in 2023, as well as what investors might reasonably expect in the new year. We encourage clients, in tandem with their consultants, to review these analyses, as well as existing investment exposures and policy targets, to ensure the appropriate positioning of portfolios in 2024 and beyond. Finally, as it relates to the new year, we wish all readers many happy returns!

 

Benchmarks:
Core Bond: Bloomberg Aggregate Index
High Yield: Bloomberg High Yield Index
Bank Loans: CS Leverage Loan Index
Broad U.S. Equities: Russell 3000 Index
Large Cap: S&P 500 Index
Mid Cap: Russell Mid Cap Index
Small Cap: Russell 2000 Index
Broad Intl Equities: MSCI ACWI ex-USA Index
Intl Large Cap: MSCI EAFE Index
Intl Small Cap: MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index
Emerging Markets: MSCI Emerging Markets Index
Commodities: S&P GSCI

Is China Guilty of Category Fraud?

With movie awards season around the corner, some entertainment pundits may use the term “category fraud” to describe races in which an individual has been nominated for an ill-suited honor instead of one that more accurately describes the work in question (e.g., best actor vs. best supporting actor). The concept of category fraud can be applied to the investment world as well, specifically as it relates to certain index constituents potentially not reflecting the attributes of the indices in which they are held. In recent time, some investors have questioned whether China’s roughly 30% weighting in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, a commonly used benchmark that tracks the space, is an example of category fraud, given the size of the nation’s economy and its robust growth over the last several decades. To investigate the extent to which China is guilty of such “fraud,” it is necessary to examine the construction methodology of the index provider in question.

In order to create its indices, MSCI evaluates countries around the world on an annual basis to determine whether they should be classified as developed, emerging, frontier, or standalone markets. When doing so, the provider aims to strike a balance between a country’s economy and the accessibility of its market, while at the same time preserving index stability. MSCI’s classification framework consists of three criteria: economic development, size and liquidity, and market accessibility. In order to be classified in a given investment universe, a country must meet the requirements of all three criteria as detailed in this week’s chart.

It does not take long for China to fall short of the requirements established by MSCI for being classified as a developed market country. As it relates to the economic development standard, the most recent World Bank high income threshold is a gross national income (“GNI”) per capita of $13,846, meaning that China would need to have posted a GNI per capita of more than $17,307 (25% above the threshold) in each of the last three years to be considered developed. However, China has never recorded such a figure in its entire history, with the nation’s highest-ever GNI per capita of just $12,850 coming in the last year. Interestingly, according to the World Bank, more than 60 nations notched higher GNI per capita figures in 2022, including other emerging market countries like Chile, Greece, Hungary, Poland, and the United Arab Emirates. These data points underscore the notion that while China has certainly emerged as an economic giant on the world’s stage, a significant portion of its vast population still has yet to achieve the same standard of living as individuals in more advanced nations. While several large Chinese companies like Alibaba, Baidu, Meituan, PDD, and Tencent meet the developed market size and liquidity requirements established by MSCI, the market accessibility criteria represent additional areas where China may fall short of developed standards. These criteria are admittedly more qualitative and subjective than the ones detailed above, however, it could be easily argued that China’s authoritarian government renders its economic and business landscape less efficient, open, and stable than those of developed countries. Examples of this dynamic include Beijing’s recent regulatory crackdown on major technology companies that led to significant value destruction, as well as the country’s history of limiting capital flows and foreign ownership.

As it relates to the charge of category fraud that some have brought against China concerning its inclusion in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, many readers may be inclined to return a verdict of not guilty in light of the information presented above. Indeed, China still has some distance to go, particularly along GNI per capita and regulatory policy lines, to be considered by MSCI and other classifiers as a developed market, and slowing economic growth and geopolitical tensions with Western countries could inhibit this progression in the near term. Marquette will continue to monitor China’s trajectory along these lines, as well as any updates to the market classification standards established by the major security index providers.

3Q 2023 Market Insights Video

This video is a recording of a live webinar held on October 26 by Marquette’s research team, featuring in-depth analysis of the third quarter and themes we’ll be monitoring for the remainder of the year.

Our Market Insights series examines the primary asset classes we cover for clients including the U.S. economy, fixed income, U.S. and non-U.S. equities, hedge funds, real estate, infrastructure, private equity, and private credit, with presentations by our research analysts and directors.

Sign up for research alerts to be invited to future webinars and notified when we publish new videos. 
For more information, questions, or feedback, please send us an email.

Portfolio Trick or Treat

Coming into 2023, investors were cautiously optimistic about 2023 market returns; cautious considering the broad losses across asset classes during 2022 but optimistic about more attractive valuations and the inherent upside potential stemming from these price points. Nine months into the year, which of these opportunities have been “treats” for investors, and which have been “tricks”?

In this edition:

  • The biggest trick of them all: Investment grade fixed income
  • But not all of fixed income has been a trick…
  • Tricks come in all sizes: U.S. small-cap equities
  • Trick, treat, or both? U.S. growth stocks
  • Currency movements still tricky
  • More treat than trick: Emerging markets
  • If you’re not surprised, it’s not a trick: Commercial real estate

Survey Says…

During its September meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) opted to keep its policy rate unchanged — within a range of 5.25% to 5.50%. In doing so, policymakers signaled a commitment to keeping rates elevated over the coming months in order to achieve the central bank’s long-run inflation target of 2.0%. Fed officials appear to be taking a deliberate and cautious approach to recent policy now that interest rates have entered firmly restrictive territory and could potentially hinder growth. The Fed also noted the “lags with which monetary policy affects economic activity” in its September FOMC statement. These lagged effects would likely be an argument in favor of slowing the pace of tightening since the impact of previous rate increases may not yet be reflected in current economic data. To that point, the most recent Summary of Economic Projections, which in part serves as an assessment of FOMC participants as it relates to appropriate monetary policy, indicates that a majority of officials favor one more rate hike in early November before policy loosening in 2024 and beyond.

The September Summary of Economic Projections yielded additional interesting pieces of information related to how policymakers are viewing the current and future macroeconomic landscape. For instance, the median response of FOMC participants for 2023 GDP growth was 2.1%, which represents a significant increase from the 1.0% figure reflected in the June survey. The median estimate of long-run GDP growth in the September survey was 1.8%. Additionally, the September survey suggests that the median FOMC official expects the unemployment rate to tick up to 4.1% in 2024 before moderating to 4.0% over the longer term. Finally, median estimates for PCE inflation, which is the preferred measure of the Fed, sat between 2.0–2.5% over the coming years.

While it is encouraging to see inflation expectations moderating without substantial decreases in future growth or material increases in the projected unemployment rate, the Fed still faces obstacles related to obtaining these desired outcomes, including a potential government shutdown. Marquette will continue to monitor the actions of the central bank and keep clients informed accordingly.