Second Quarter Review of Asset Allocation: Risks and Opportunities

Overall, the second quarter was positive for financial markets, thanks to strong economic fundamentals and expected Fed stimulus. Unemployment remains low at 3.7% and inflation (1.8% year over year) is near the Fed’s long-term target of 2%. However, there are increasing concerns about a global economic slowdown and early forecasts for 2Q GDP growth are around 1.5%, far lower than what we’ve seen in recent quarters. Globally, the most important trends we see are the following:

  • The U.S.-China trade conflict remains ongoing as talks between the two countries resumed, but little progress has been made;
  • The Federal Reserve is expected to cut rates in July and markets are forecasting another one to two cuts by the end of the year;
  • Business sentiment is declining ­— most notably in the PMI manufacturing index, which is now dangerously close to falling below its growth threshold;
  • Britain continues to struggle with its Brexit and elected a new PM (Boris Johnson) on July 23rd;
  • China and Europe are expected in increase their stimulus measures to combat slow growth and overall global uncertainty;
  • Late-cycle dynamics in credit and equity markets.

The impact of these trends is explored further in this newsletter as we review second-quarter performance and expectations going forward for each of the major asset classes.

Read > Second Quarter Review of Asset Allocation: Risks and Opportunities

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Bank Loans Position Paper

Bank loans represent a key strategic asset class for most institutional investors’ fixed income portfolios. Some of the critical benefits of bank loans include yield that is typically greater than that of core bonds, a floating rate and therefore very little interest rate risk, and a senior secured level in the debt capital structure of issuers such that default risk is minimized and recovery rates are maximized. This position paper covers the history of the asset class as well as some unique characteristics that make it a vital part of many institutional investors’ portfolios. We will also examine its historical returns and correlations with other asset classes, as well as its risks ranging from credit to liquidity risk and interest risk to reinvestment risk. We will conclude with an assessment of its recent valuations as well as how to access this asset class.

Download PDF >

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

 

Sell in May and Go Away?

Global equity markets declined in May on a flurry of geopolitical news. As tensions persist, stocks are grasping to sustain their former rocket-like pace.

This newsletter details the recent trade and tariff announcements, their impact on the markets, and a look at what to expect in the remaining months of 2019.

Read > Sell in May and Go Away?

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Municipal or Taxable Bonds for High Net Worth Investors?

Municipal bonds remain attractive and still make sense for high net worth investors on a go-forward basis even in the wake of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that went into effect in 2018 and the spread-widening that we experienced in the credit markets during the fourth quarter of 2018. This research brief compares the current state of municipal bonds versus taxable bonds, including:

  • The Municipal/Treasury Ratio
  • A Comparison of Long-Term Historical Returns
  • Tax-Equivalent Yields

Read > Municipal or Taxable Bonds for High Net Worth Investors?

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Greg Leonberger Quoted on Equity Risk, Black Swan Events

On October 24, Greg Leonberger, Director of Research, was quoted in a FundFire article on equity risk. The article reported on a public pension fund that is considering cutting its U.S. public equity portfolio by 10% out of concern over potential Black Swan events.

Greg responded that while concerns about equity risk are common, usually the very maximum cut a pension can afford is only 5%. “You see some slight movements… but we’re not seeing a mass exodus out of public equities out of fear of an upcoming market correction,” Greg said. “The funding levels are considerably bad enough that many need to maintain these allocations.”

The need for liquidity in a downturn is another factor keeping pensions from exploring other asset classes. “If there’s a market downturn and you need liquidity in your portfolio, private equity can’t provide it,” Greg added. “There’s really not a compelling opportunity out there to shift assets towards.”

To read the article, visit the FundFire website (subscription required).

First Quarter Review of Asset Allocation

Heading into 2019, the primary risks facing financial markets were the trade war with China, the U.S. government shutdown, Brexit uncertainty, and further Fed rate hikes. However, in the first quarter the majority of these worries subsided.

In this newsletter, we analyze the current market environment with a review of recent performance and future expectations for each major asset class. As always, we caution investors to stay diversified and rebalance as appropriate. There are always potential disruptors to the financial markets and the most powerful tend to be largely unexpected. We will continue to monitor markets and developments as they occur to guide our clients to the most optimal portfolio decisions given the backdrop of program goals and risk tolerance.

Read > First Quarter Review of Asset Allocation

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

The Latest Key Developments in the Healthcare Industry

Health systems today face significant challenges, further complicating an ever-changing landscape. Some of the most notable trends we see in the space include:

  • Higher interest rates, which impact borrowing costs as well as investment opportunities;
  • Efforts to gradually repeal the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”);
  • The emergence of value-based payment programs;
  • The advent of major vertical integrations such as CVS-Aetna;
  • A growing demand for digital healthcare

The following article summarizes these key issues for health systems and where appropriate, provides some potential solutions.

Read > The Latest Key Developments in the Healthcare Industry

With over 20 years of healthcare investment consulting experience, Marquette serves healthcare clients across a broad range of operating cultures — including health systems, stand-alone hospitals, and specialty organizations — and with a variety of focus areas — including operating funds, retirement planning, insurance, endowments, and foundations. For more Marquette coverage of the healthcare industry, please see our previous newsletter Healthcare Organizations’ Top 3 Investment Concerns for Balance Sheet Assets.

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Should Investors Reduce Equity Allocations After Yield Curve Inversion?

The yield curve plots the relationship between U.S. bond yields and their maturities, and typically slopes upward: the longer you hold the security, the higher the return given various risks through time such as inflation, opportunity cost, and economic uncertainty. The yield curve, however, can be inverted when high demand for long-term Treasuries drives the price up and the yield down resulting in a downward sloping curve. Yield curve inversion often signals a pessimistic view of the economy in which investors look for protection against slow economic growth and higher-than-expected inflation. Furthermore, the previous four instances of curve inversion have been followed by a market correction, though it can sometimes be years before a market correction follows inversion.

Last Friday, the 10-year Treasury yield fell below short-term yields with maturities ranging from 1-month to 1-year in response to disappointing Eurozone data, geopolitical risks around Brexit, and Fed Chairman Jerome Powell’s remark on a global economic slowdown. Shortly after the yield curve inverted — especially after the negative yield spread emerged between 3-month and 10-year Treasuries (regarded as the Fed’s most sensitive measure of market sentiment) — the equity market sold off and the S&P 500 total return fell by 1.89%. This immediate reaction led some investors to believe the correction was already unfolding.

While it is impossible to determine at this point if the correction is already here, investors should take comfort knowing that the equity market eventually rebounds from these corrections and shows resilience after the yield curve inverts. Our chart above shows the subsequent 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year returns of the S&P 500 index after the primary inversion data point — the spread between the 2-year and 10-year Treasury yields — first went negative (thus inverting). For example, after the 10s/2s yield inversion on December 27, 2005, S&P 500 annualized total returns after 1 year, 2 years and 5 years were 15.6%, 10.7% and 2.2% respectively. Over longer time periods after yield curve inversion, such as 7 or 10 years, equity returns more closely resemble their long-term averages. The other primary takeaway from the chart is that shorter-term equity returns — 3, 6, or 12 months — feature significant disparity from the last four yield curve inversions, indicating each instance is different in terms of magnitude and timing after initial 10s/2s inversion. Thus, we do not recommend that investors reduce their equity allocations in an attempt to time the potential correction after inversion, and over the longer-term, equities are still expected to be positive contributors to portfolio returns, even if the yield curve is temporarily inverted.

Print PDF> Should Investors Reduce Equity Allocations After Yield Curve Inversion?

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Rebalancing Position Paper

Regularly rebalancing portfolios is one of the key duties of trustees and other fiduciaries responsible for managing an institutional portfolio. Asset allocations are set to provide a predetermined risk/reward profile that fits a fund’s objectives and constraints. Portfolios are rebalanced when they drift away from policy target in order to maintain the risk/reward profiles implicit in the original asset allocations. But how often should clients rebalance their portfolios? What guidelines should clients use to determine when to rebalance? And what are the costs and benefits associated with rebalancing? This paper takes a rigorous look at rebalancing and provides some guidelines for implementing a rebalancing policy.

Download PDF >

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

 

Deciphering the Bond Markets: How Much Duration and Credit Risk Should I Take?

2018 Investment Symposium flash talk by Ben Mohr, CFA

Given the current fixed income environment of rising rates and tight credit spreads, investors are questioning how much interest rate risk and credit risk they should hold in their portfolios. This session addresses the questions of how much duration (interest rate risk) and credit risk investors should take by examining current market conditions, anticipated changes, and an overall assessment of where we are in the credit cycle.

A summary of this flash talk can be downloaded here.