Topic Tags: Fixed Income - Investment Grade

Is the U.S. Economy Headed for a Recession?

The U.S. Treasury yield curve, as measured by the difference between 10-year Treasuries and 2-year Treasuries, has flattened significantly over the past several years, decreasing from 2.65% on December 31, 2013 to 0.65% on November 15, 2017. In fact, this is the flattest that the yield curve has been since November 4, 2007, just prior to the onset of the “Great Recession,” and this has sparked concerns about a potential recession on the near-term horizon. A flattening yield curve has typically been associated with concerns about future economic growth, so mounting worries about a potential recession are understandable.

However, these concerns appear to be a bit premature. First, it is important to note that every recession since 1980 (including the “Great Recession”) was precipitated not only by a flattening yield curve, but by an inverted yield curve, meaning that yields on longer-term (i.e. 10-year) Treasuries were below yields on shorter-term (i.e. 2-year) Treasuries. Given that yields on 10-year Treasuries are currently 0.65% higher than yields on 2-year Treasuries, we are nowhere near an inverted yield curve. Second, it is worth noting that it is fairly common for the yield curve to flatten during rate hike cycles when short-term rates tend to rise faster than long-term rates. Given that the Federal Reserve Bank has increased interest rates four times since 2015, a flattening yield curve is not an unexpected occurrence. Finally, it is important to note that the yields on U.S. Treasuries — particularly the longer-end of the curve — have been significantly impacted by the actions of other central banks around the world. In 2013, the Bank of Japan launched a $1.4 trillion quantitative easing program that primarily focused on purchasing longer maturity Japanese government bonds. In 2015 the European Central Bank launched a $1.2 trillion quantitative easing program that primarily focused on purchasing longer maturity European government bonds. These large-scale bond purchase programs drastically lowered interest rates on Japanese and European government bonds, enticing investors from around the world to purchase U.S. Treasuries, which offered significantly higher relative yields. Between December 31, 2013 (when the spread between 10-year and 2-year Treasuries was 2.65%) and November 15, 2017 (when the spread between 10-year and 2-year Treasuries was 0.65%), yields on 10-year U.S. Treasuries actually decreased from 3.03% to 2.34%, while yields on 2-year U.S. Treasuries increased from 0.38% to 1.69%.

While the flattening yield curve is somewhat concerning, it appears that this combination of Federal Reserve rate hikes boosting the short end of the curve and quantitative easing programs from global central banks depressing the longer end of the curve is the primary driver of the flattening yield curve, not concerns about future economic growth in the United States.

Print PDF

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

2017 Investment Symposium Briefing

A quick recap of the 2017 Investment Symposium — from CEO Brian Wrubel’s opening remarks to the keynotes and flash talks. This year’s symposium covered the current market environment, emerging investment themes and investment stewardship challenges in the year ahead. Our flash talk format is designed to brief clients on pressing topics and encourage timely conversations with investment consultants.

Full keynote and flash talk videos available on demand:

Will the Fed “Normalize” My Investment Returns?


Flash talk by Ben Mohr, CFA at Marquette’s 2017 Investment Symposium

In this session, we review common terms and concepts in fixed income including Fed rate hikes and the Fed’s balance sheet, and explore how each concept can assist investors in modeling bond returns. We also examine potential outcomes of the upcoming change in Fed leadership and FOMC and impacts on client portfolios.

This Market is One Cool Cat

Hurricanes Harvey and Irma substantially impacted the lives and infrastructure of all that was in their paths. They also directly impacted certain investments, namely catastrophe bonds, (“cat bonds”). Catastrophe bonds can help diversify a bond portfolio’s rate, credit and currency risk with non-correlating nature risk. Cat bonds are issued by insurance companies that pool property and casualty policies. They pay coupons to the bondholder using the policy premiums received. However, when a natural disaster occurs, the principal of a cat bond can be used to pay insurance claims on the pool of policies. Historically, annual cat bond returns average 5% to 10%.

This week’s chart shows the Swiss Re Cat Bond Index on the top compared to the Credit Suisse High Yield Bond Index on the bottom. Hurricane Harvey caused only a negligible 0.3% decline in the cat bond index followed by a 0.5% rebound, since the most severe damage came from flooding. Flooding is generally not covered by cat bonds, as cat bonds primarily cover hurricane damages associated with wind. However, Hurricane Irma caused a 16% initial decline, as the index has roughly 20% exposure to Florida hurricanes. Moreover, the state of Florida requires that all homeowners hold hurricane insurance.

Hurricane Irma qualifies as one of the top 10 costliest natural disasters ever recorded, with damage estimates ranging from $50 billion to $100 billion. It is akin to the 2008 housing crisis for the corporate credit and equity markets. The bottom chart shows the high yield bond index declining during the 2008 housing crisis by 33% peak-to-trough, which was over twice the initial decline of the cat bond index due to Hurricane Irma. With recent damage estimates adjusted downwards from an initial overshoot, the Swiss Re Cat Bond Index has already rebounded by 10% only a few days after Irma struck. This makes its net decline 6% to-date as the index continues to recover, showing inherent resilience in the cat bond market. Our thoughts are with those affected by these recent disasters.

Print PDF

Healthcare Organizations’ Top 3 Investment Concerns for Balance Sheet Assets

Historically, healthcare organizations have covered their cost of debt by investing in a conservative mix of fixed income securities. However, for most of the recovery since the Great Recession, the yield on their debt payments exceeded the Bloomberg Barclays Aggregate (Agg) bond index yield. Therefore, many organizations were forced to consider riskier assets to cover their debt payments as a result of this adverse spread. Now that the Federal Reserve rate hikes are underway, Agg yields are once again approaching parity with healthcare issuer debt yields and thereby reducing the pressure to invest in riskier assets to make up for the spread disparity.

Download PDF

Central Bank Balancing Act

The Federal Reserve continues to signal its intention to reduce its $4.5 trillion balance sheet, with the markets anticipating the first move to occur in September. Much of the liquidity, and consequently, asset returns, in the global markets today could be attributed to the substantial bond and other securities purchases made by the major central banks, thereby ballooning their balance sheets.

Our chart this week shows the Federal Reserve (Fed), European Central Bank (ECB) and Bank of Japan (BOJ) balance sheets over time, totaling $14 trillion today. While the Fed has effectively stopped growing its balance sheet since 2014, the ECB and BOJ continue to expand their balance sheets. With the U.S. enjoying the strongest economy relative to Europe and Asia, the Fed will be the first to taper its balance sheet. This move would effectively slow down stimulus in the U.S., with the ECB and BOJ’s balance sheet tapering to follow at some point in the future when their economies have resuscitated. The Fed has been broadly communicating the mechanics of its tapering, and we expect the markets to respond relatively moderately to the first reduction event.

Print PDF

Growing Bond Market in China

Our chart this week shows the five largest bond markets in the world. We will focus on China and highlight a few reasons why the Chinese bond market is projected to overtake Japan in the next few years.

For starters, up until last year capital controls put in place by the Chinese government were designed to limit foreign investment. As a result of some newly implemented reforms since then, international investors have slowly been allowed direct access to the Chinese domestic bond market. For example, on July 3, 2017 Beijing and Hong Kong opened a trading link which will allow investors based in Hong Kong to trade directly in the Chinese bond market.

Additionally, in March Citigroup announced the inclusion of Chinese onshore bonds in several of its market indices and more recently Bloomberg announced similar plans. Inclusion in multiple market indices will aid in growth while increasing foreign investment.

Finally, new rules recently implemented in China require the country’s 22 provinces to borrow in the local government bond market instead of seeking out bank financing which had previously been the preferred route. This change should also contribute positively to the continued expansion of China’s bond market and will offer greater access to more investors.

Print PDF

Will the Yield Curve Invert?

The Chinese yield curve inverted recently. Does this mean that the U.S. yield curve might invert soon? What does inversion mean for investors? Inverted yield curves have been precursors of bad news for the equity market. In the past 20 years, the U.S. yield curve inverted twice, once in 2000 and once in 2006 and the S&P 500 subsequently dropped 48% and 53% following each inversion, respectively. When the yield curve inverts, it usually means that the market is pessimistic about the economy and drives up long bond prices as safe havens, thereby reducing their yields relative to short bond yields, which typically have been driven up by rate hikes.

This week’s chart observes several signals that appear just before the yield curve inverts. First, there are several years of a downward trend in the spread between 10-Year and 2-Year Treasury yields (also known as steepness) and an upward trend in the equity market, as the orange and red arrows show in the chart. Since the last inversion in 2006, we have seen this signal for a while. Second, GDP growth reaches its peak. For the last five years, GDP growth has been stable and at a moderate level, and it is unclear if it has reached a peak or could grow further. Lastly, it takes time for the spread to become negative and the change is not abrupt. Before the inversion, the spread was around 30bps in 2000 and 15bps in 2006. The spread as of May 2017 was around 50bps and still has room to contract.

Overall, there are several signals that suggest that yield curve inversion is coming. However, inversion is unlikely to happen in the near future. The current yield curve is reasonably steep, the market has a positive sentiment about the economy and other economic boosts from the Trump administration may come into play, such as job creation initiatives and tax cuts for businesses and consumers. Yield curve inversion is not yet impending.

Print PDF

Fed Balance Sheet Normalization

The Federal Reserve recently increased its commentary on how and when to reduce its $4.5 trillion balance sheet, comprised of $2.5 trillion in Treasury bonds and $2 trillion in mortgage-backed securities (MBS). Shown in this week’s chart, that amount grew at a rapid rate from under $1 trillion during the 2008 financial crisis to where it is today. This growth was the result of unprecedented monetary stimulus in the form of large-scale bond-buying to keep the economy afloat by flooding it with cash through the Great Recession.

Recent commentary suggests that the Fed might gradually normalize its balance sheet later this year at an expected rate of $1.5 trillion spread over five years. The minutes released this Wednesday from the latest Federal Open Market Committee meeting show even more clarity on this process: The Fed intends to pre-announce, on a regular basis, caps on the amounts of bonds that it would allow to mature without reinvesting. It would start at very low caps and would then raise these caps on a quarterly basis, depending on how strongly the economy continues to grow. The minutes stated, “Nearly all policymakers expressed a favorable view of this general approach.”

Gradually reducing the Fed’s balance sheet may have a similar effect as hiking rates, which the Fed is expected to continue to do. It may ultimately increase Treasury and MBS yields and put downward pressure on their prices as the Fed reduces its role as a buyer. The market is expected to counter this effect, however, as international demand for Treasury bonds remain strong given the continued low and negative rates in countries such as Germany and Japan. Moreover, the market was able to absorb about $5 trillion of MBS during the housing boom, and is expected to absorb much of the MBS that is not retained in by the Fed. The ultimate effect on interest rates from these two opposing forces is unknown, but at the least they should mostly offset to prevent a rapid increase in interest rates.

Print PDF

Who’s Buying?

Over the last 15 years, the U.S. Treasury market has grown from $3.3 trillion in 2000 to $14.3 trillion at the end of 2016; certainly the Financial Crisis and subsequent stimulus programs have contributed to this massive growth. Throughout this period, foreign demand has constituted a consistent 40–50% of the market for U.S. Treasuries. However, the demand has shifted over the years, and our chart of the week chronicles the evolution of foreign buyers and sellers of U.S. Treasuries from 2000 through 2016. Perhaps most notable is that in 2015, foreign demand began to wane as China and other emerging market nations began to defend their currencies against appreciation and consequently reallocated away from U.S. debt.

On Monday, former Federal Reserve Chairs Bernanke and Greenspan spoke about the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet and the United States debt market. Bernanke believes the Federal Reserve should aim to reduce its balance sheet from $4.4 trillion to somewhere in the range of $2.3–2.8 trillion. Of the Federal Reserve’s $4.4 trillion in assets, approximately $2.5 trillion are U.S. Treasury Securities. From 2019-2026, $250 billion in Treasury securities will reach maturity each year. These securities will have to be rolled over in addition to any further deficit spending. To avoid this constant debt overhang, the administration is considering “ultra-long-term bonds”, which would push the repayment of this debt to beyond 2049. Ultimately, the declining foreign demand for U.S. Treasuries combined with the Trump Administration’s plans to cut taxes and increase spending could make it difficult for the Federal Reserve to reduce its balance sheet without facing higher yield demands at Treasury auctions.

Print PDF