Category: Chart of the Week

There Is No Crystal Ball

The Federal Reserve is arguably the most influential financial institution in the world. Their eight meetings a year are highly anticipated, their policy decisions are highly scrutinized, and their economic projections and commentary can move markets. Last month the Nasdaq sold off nearly 9% on concerns of heightened inflation and expected rate hikes by the central bank. The market reversed sharply after the January FOMC meeting on Chair Jerome Powell’s comments about rising inflation and monetary tightening. There are even trading strategies built on predicting market movements after the Fed’s comments and monetary policy surprises. While the monetary policy decisions made by the Fed have a material impact on the economy, their projections are not always accurate, especially when it comes to rate hikes.

Our chart of the week examines the summary of economic projections of GDP, unemployment, inflation, and the number of 25 basis point rate hikes projected for the year over the last eight years. Prior to the COVID pandemic in 2020, the Fed had fairly accurately predicted GDP, inflation, and unemployment, more often than not coming within 0.2% of actual full-year numbers. Ironically, when it comes to interest rate changes — the metric most directly controlled by the Federal Reserve — predictions worsen. While the Fed accurately foresaw no movement in 2014 and 2021 and were on the mark with three rate hikes in 2017, they greatly overestimated hikes in 2015 and 2016 and underestimated rate cuts in 2019 and 2020. Following four rate hikes in 2018, after starting the year predicting three, the Fed quickly reversed course in 2019, cutting rates three times, a sharp contrast to initial expectations for one additional rate increase.

This year the members of the FOMC are predicting three rate hikes, though history has shown us actual results could differ greatly. Monetary policy and economics are never an exact science, and the continually evolving supply and demand dynamics behind inflation make this year all the more challenging. There are simply variables that cannot be predicted. In other words, there is no crystal ball. As the year unfolds, we will continue to keep our clients abreast of policy updates out of the Fed as well as any other developments that could impact the course of rates.

Print PDF > There Is No Crystal Ball

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Any Port in a Storm

The volatile start to the new year has all eyes on the Federal Reserve and its increasing hawkishness. As the Fed prepares to raise interest rates later this year, we look at reverse repurchase agreements and what they mean for the markets.

As part of the Federal Reserve’s efforts to maintain monetary policy and manage liquidity, the New York Fed engages in temporary transactions where reserve balances of excess liquidity are added to or reduced through repurchase (repo) and reverse repurchase (reverse repo) agreements. These operations have a short-term, self-reversing effect on bank reserves. Repurchase agreements involve the Fed purchasing Treasury securities from a counterparty (typically a large institution with excess reserves), with an agreement to resell the securities back at a slightly higher price, representing a small rate of interest. The repo transaction temporarily increases the supply of reserve balances in the banking system and provides liquidity. Reverse repurchase agreements involve the opposite, where counterparties temporarily purchase Treasury securities to be sold back at a later date. Reverse repo transactions help alleviate any undue downward pressure on the effective federal funds rate and set a floor under overnight interest rates by providing a short-term alternative investment for large institutions with excess liquidity reserves.

After a period of dormancy in the beginning of 2021, the Federal Reserve’s overnight window for reverse repurchase agreements saw a rapid rise in demand when the counterparty limit for reverse repos was raised from $30B to $80B in March. This trend continued to accelerate when the limit was again raised to $160B in September, closing out the year at a record level of $1.91T in volume. Low interest rates and the Fed’s quantitative easing efforts presented large institutions with a challenge as to where to invest record levels of excess liquidity reserves. The solution has so far been to make use of the overnight window and earn minimal interest via a risk-free investment in Treasuries.

Time will tell how the Fed will execute its monetary policy changes this year and how markets will respond to that shift. Institutions currently utilizing reverse repurchase agreements may change course once they have higher yielding alternatives, with the impact to the economy and market dependent on where those reserves go. Marquette will continue to carefully follow policy decisions from the Federal Reserve and monitor other indicators, like the demand for overnight repurchase agreements, to help provide clarity during this period of heightened market volatility.

Print PDF > Any Port in a Storm

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

In Search of Lost Yield

The fixed income space faces several significant challenges in 2022. First, the ability of many bond strategies to generate viable income streams is limited by interest rates that remain at historic lows. Additionally, elevated levels of inflation, which may remain above the Federal Reserve’s long-term target of 2.5% throughout the year, will serve to dilute real returns. To that point, the 5-year breakeven rate, a measure of expected near-term inflation in the U.S., ended last year at 2.9% after reaching a level of 3.2% just a few weeks prior, which represents a record high for the metric since Bloomberg began tracking it in 2002. As displayed in this week’s chart, Treasuries, mortgage-backed securities, and high yield municipal bonds exhibited flat-to-negative inflation-adjusted yields at the end of 2021. Finally, many expect rates to rise this year as the Fed curtails stimulus programs and begins to implement increasingly restrictive monetary policy to combat the rise in price levels. The current landscape begs the question: What can fixed income investors do going forward?

In the coming years, traditional bond investors may need to focus on a wider variety of sectors within the asset class to attain desired yields. Specifically, preferred securities, emerging market debt (EMD), high yield bonds, and senior loans all offer yields that are in excess of the 5-year breakeven rate, even when adjusting for duration. Bank loans may be particularly attractive going forward, as these instruments typically offer floating interest rates that protect investors from increases in short-term yields. Of course, the risks of each of these spaces should be thoroughly considered before any allocation changes are implemented. The EMD space, for example, carries with it significant currency risk, while preferreds exhibit credit risk and are subordinated in the capital structure, providing investors with a lower claim on assets than more senior debt. While all of these sectors are not uncommonly featured in investment portfolios, market participants should investigate the merits and drawbacks of each before creating or modifying target allocations, with a specific focus on duration, credit spread sensitivities, and liquidity terms.

Print PDF > In Search of Lost Yield

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

2021 Smashes VC Records as Late-Stage Deals Reshape the Market

U.S. venture capital deployment in 2021 smashed the previous record set in 2020, as $329.8 billion of funds were infused (+98% from 2020) into over 15,500 deals (+27% from 2020). While this tremendous volume of investment was deployed across the market, late-stage deals in particular raised over $100 million in capital in the last year. In fact, within the U.S. venture capital market, the substantial amount of late-stage venture deployment alone eclipsed the previous overall deployment record by 15%, as $190.8 billion of investments were deployed across 4,704 late-stage deals during 2021.

The growth trajectory of the late-stage venture capital market has been steadily climbing over the past decade as part of a broader evolution of the space, as private market companies have become larger and more durable due to capital availability, increased transparency, and minimal reporting requirements. That being said, the market may have now reached a size at which investors could begin to view early-stage venture capital and late-stage growth equity as distinct asset classes given the different investment considerations associated with each (e.g., duration, risk, returns, etc.) and separate the two within portfolios. Indeed, as late-stage deals become larger in size they become increasingly different investments, as many growth companies that have previously been supported by early-stage venture investors evolve into more established businesses with substantial revenues, proven product-market fits, much shorter duration (five years or fewer), lower loss potential, and valuations that are more aligned with public market peers.

As the venture capital market continues to expand due to new participants and existing investors increasing their allocations to the space, it is worth considering allocation mixes within portfolios with an eye toward having specific and dedicated early- and late-stage venture capital deployment targets.

Print PDF > 2021 Smashes VC Records as Late-Stage Deals Reshape the Market

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Office Space in Need of a Booster

As the Omicron variant continues to spread like wildfire across the globe, companies once again find themselves modifying plans for a return to in-person work. Although the market for U.S. office space started to show signs of stabilization during the second half of 2021, the new wave of Omicron cases has already started to impede the recovery across most industries. As a result, the office sector could potentially endure the most profound and longest lasting impact from the recent case surge among the four major core property types. Current remote work dynamics and incremental office supply are expected to exert additional upward pressure on vacancy rates, which increased during the third quarter of 2021 to 16.8%. While the emergence of virus variants and the prevalence of unvaccinated individuals may act as catalysts for permanent changes within the office sector, many companies are expected to opt for flexible work schedules in 2022 rather than leasing additional real estate. With businesses contemplating further vaccination requirements, as well as continued travel restrictions and virtual interactions, there now exists a widening gap between occupied and underutilized office space. To that point, net absorption rates, which serve to quantify the difference between leases and vacancies, have fallen by roughly 120 million square feet during the pandemic, representing the largest drop since the 2001 Technology Bubble.

Going forward, corporations and employees alike may be forced to navigate through a unique work environment on a permanent basis. While hybrid and remote working approaches will likely serve as headwinds for the demand for office space in the aggregate, institutional investors may be well-positioned to achieve portfolio alpha with long-term exposures to high-quality tenants, Class A properties, office conversions, and distressed low-occupancy buildings. As a firm, Marquette will remain focused on working with our clients to target markets with a compelling mix of talent, demographics, and tenants.

Print PDF > Office Space in Need of a Booster

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Credit Spreads Snap Back from Initial Omicron Surge

Given the positive news on the weakness of the Omicron variant and its susceptibility to at least some of the COVID-19 vaccines, credit spreads have generally retraced their widening since the first Omicron case in South Africa was reported to the World Health Organization on November 24th, 2021. Our chart this week compares high-yield spreads against two averages using the Bloomberg High Yield index. The lower dotted line is the average spread for the year-to-date period, with current spreads sitting just above of this figure. The higher dotted line is the since-inception average spread (excluding the extreme periods of 2008 and 2009), with today’s spreads still generally extremely tight compared to this long-term average despite the recent Omicron scare. While we assess only U.S. high yield corporate spreads, these are generally representative for investment grade bonds, bank loans, and emerging markets debt as well.

Omicron has quickly spread to at least 57 countries around the world thus far, but spreads tightened across the board last week as President Biden chose to institute stricter COVID-19 testing requirements for travelers entering the U.S. from abroad instead of implementing more lockdowns and broad mask mandates. Additionally, Moderna and Pfizer have been mobilizing to update their vaccines against the Omicron variant. However, the tail end of last week brought with it some widening pressure as Europe tightened its COVID-19 restrictions and the Consumer Price Index saw a 6.8% increase for the month of November on a year-over-year basis, topping the previous month’s 6.2%. This figure raised some concern that the Federal Reserve may accelerate its tapering and rate hike schedule.

Last week, the fully vaccinated rate remained at 60% for the U.S. and rose one point to 45% for the world. With still a long runway to go before herd immunity levels of 80% are reached, and since issuers remain risk-averse as evidenced by benign fundamentals ranging from generally low leverage to use of loan and bond issuance proceeds directed towards refinancings rather than LBOs, we may expect spreads to potentially tighten further. It is worth noting that this tightening may not be without potential dislocations along the way. As of this writing, spreads are very near all-time tights. Marquette will continue to monitor fixed income valuations, fundamentals, and technicals as we progress through the recovery from the pandemic.

Print PDF > Credit Spreads Snap Back from Initial Omicron Surge

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Don’t Forget About Those Old 401(k) Accounts!

According to a recent study conducted by Capitalize, $1.35 trillion worth of assets were held in forgotten 401(k) accounts as of May 31st, 2021. This figure is based on estimates of 24.3 million retirement accounts with an average balance of $55,400 per account. Based on this study, it is evident that millions of participants are missing out on additional retirement savings each year their old accounts are left behind with previous employer plans, since holding multiple accounts often leads to investors incurring higher fees. To that point, Capitalize estimates that an individual could experience up to $700,000 in foregone retirement savings as a result of forgotten 401(k) accounts. As 2021 draws to a close, plans sponsors should look to begin the new year by helping employees consolidate retirement accounts, which could lead to cost savings and the accumulation of plan assets, by utilizing the following tactics:

  • Confirm participant data, including email and mailing addresses, is up to date to ensure communications will be received
  • Collaborate with the relationship manager of your retirement plan recordkeeper to develop a targeted participant communication strategy (email, hard copy mail, or onsite visits) that highlights the benefits of consolidating retirement accounts from previous employers
  • Ensure communications clearly explain the process for rolling over outside retirement assets
    · Paperwork required to effectuate rollovers can be confusing to many participants, however, the majority of recordkeepers employ support teams available to assist individuals with transfers
    · The phone numbers and email addresses of these support teams should be clearly identified in communications to participants
  • To increase the chances of success when it comes to participant rollovers, communication campaigns should be continued throughout the entire year

Finally, technological developments and the reporting capabilities of retirement plan recordkeepers will allow plan sponsors to measure the effectiveness of these campaigns. By the end of 2022, sponsors should review results related to the number of rollovers completed, the amount of assets gained, and the extent to which employees were actively engaged with the topic during the year. This may help plans delineate future goals and better understand the most effective ways to communicate to participants.

If this is of interest to your plan, please contact your Marquette consultant for additional information.

Print PDF > Don’t Forget About Those Old 401(k) Accounts!

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

 

‘Tis the Season for Consumer Spending?

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant changes to, among a plethora of other things, consumer behavior in the United States. As a result of the virus outbreak in early 2020, the personal savings rate of domestic consumers saw a dramatic increase to a record high of 26.0% in the second quarter of last year. This propensity for conservativism during times of economic hardship can clearly be seen in our chart this week. Direct relief payments made to individuals as part of the government’s massive stimulus program were among the primary contributors to increased personal savings rates, as consumers saw limited opportunities to spend while in lockdown. As time went on, many individuals used excess savings to pay down debt and invest in equity markets, which helped fuel historic levels of retail trading activity. Online retail sales also increased a few months into the pandemic in large part due to pent-up demand, as indicated by the 10.0% quarter-over-quarter change in personal consumption during the third quarter of 2020.

With the holiday season upon us, many investors are curious about the state of the American consumer in light of the challenges posed by the last two years. On one hand, consumer balance sheets remain relatively strong. At the end of the third quarter of 2021, the personal savings rate in the United States was roughly 9.6%, well above the figure recorded at the end of 2019 of 7.4%. This likely means that individuals have more cash at their disposal than in previous years. At the same time, there are several headwinds facing consumers that may persist into the new year. Higher costs due to inflationary pressures and supply chain difficulties have already impacted a significant number of Americans and may cause a drop in consumer confidence if these issues are persistent in nature. The Omicron variant and other strains of the COVID-19 virus may also lead to renewed calls for economic shutdowns, which could leave consumers with fewer spending options. Finally, it is important to note that while the personal savings rate rose overall for consumers during the first several months of the pandemic, increased rates of savings were disproportionately attributed to higher-income individuals and households. This could mean that a large subset of the population is ill-equipped to deal with rising costs and, as a result, unable to spend at levels consistent with history. Ultimately, only time will tell how the American consumer will respond to ongoing uncertainty and whether governments and policymakers will see a need to provide additional economic relief. In light of the dynamics at play and the headwinds currently facing consumers, investors should remain realistic and pragmatic about spending levels heading into the final month of 2021.

Print PDF > ‘Tis the Season for Consumer Spending?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Bulls on Parade: What’s Driving the 2021 Digital Asset Rally?

The first bitcoin futures ETF — the ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF — was approved on October 15th, making it easier for investors to access the most well-known cryptocurrency. Not surprisingly, Bitcoin’s network value (the market capitalization) surged on the announcement, reaching $1.13T (equating to $61,571 per coin). However, this was not the first time Bitcoin’s capitalization crossed $1T: as the orange line in the chart shows, Bitcoin’s total value has crossed this threshold several times since 2020, with significant volatility along the way.

Certainly, the ProShares ETF approval has provided more access to investors, and the October run-up can at least be partially attributed to this new channel. However, there also appears to be an evolving demand dynamic in terms of investor type, which could create broader acceptance of cryptocurrency as an asset class in the coming years. We can examine this trend by looking at the types of transactions on the bitcoin network to see what has changed over the last five years.

Illustrated in blue and on the left axis is bitcoin’s daily exchange-to-network flow ratio: this measures bitcoin transfers on open exchanges (both inflows and outflows) as a percent of total network transfers. The total network is a classic ledger of accounts, the blockchain technology which serves as the foundation for all cryptocurrencies; transfers are debits and credits to and from accounts. Transfers are classified as either open exchange (retail investors), or over the counter (i.e., wholesale, OTC — more akin to institutional investors). As the ratios in blue approximate open exchange flows, the remaining network transfers approximate OTC flows. Overlaying exchange flows and network value propounds the degree to which exchanges drive or do not drive asset appreciation. To that point, the data illustrated above suggests three points:

  • Historically, retail participants via open exchanges drove Bitcoin demand. Daily exchange-to-network flows surged from mid-2017 through mid-2020, averaging ~35.2%, with a high of 99.4%.
  • Around August 2020, the drivers of demand shifted. Daily exchange-to-network flows decreased and have sustained five-year lows, averaging ~15.4% in 2021, with a low of 0.8%.
  • OTC transfers correspond with the 2021 rally, averaging ~84.6% of network transfers. Although it is not definitive, this implies institutional wholesale transfers are the dominant driver of Bitcoin’s value appreciation through 2021.

Taking this analysis a step further, it appears that more institutional money is driving demand for bitcoin. In the past, the infancy of the asset class coupled with the radical volatility of returns was enough to frighten most institutional investors off. If the trend suggested by this chart continues, however, bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies may become a more common holding across institutional portfolios.

Print PDF > Bulls on Parade: What’s Driving the 2021 Digital Asset Rally?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

China: Regulators, Mount Up!

Over the last year, the Chinese government has enacted a series of new regulations targeting several domestic industries including finance, health care, and real estate. In general, the policies that have garnered the most attention are those directed at Chinese technology companies and range from restrictions on the use of advertising algorithms targeting consumers to limitations on the amount of time children are permitted to spend gaming online. As displayed in this week’s chart, these new regulations, the majority of which have been codified in the last few months, have shaken equity investors and led to a significant drop in the MSCI China Index. Specifically, the benchmark lost roughly 18.2% in the third quarter of this year alone as investors scrambled to react to the new regulatory environment in China and its ramifications.

Recent efforts of Chinese government authorities mark a sea change in the country’s social and economic goals and the ways in which those goals are pursued. For decades, China was largely comfortable with encouraging economic development at all costs, however, it seems officials in Beijing have now shifted their focus to pragmatic, quality growth with an emphasis on both prosperity and sustainability ahead of National Party Congress elections in 2022. It is worth mentioning that the developments of the last several months do not constitute a new experience for Chinese companies or investors. China’s government has a history of stepping in after periods of unchecked economic growth, with the targeting of the gaming industry in 2018 serving as a recent example. That said, the significant volume of policy changes that have been enacted in the last year has caught many investors by surprise, which has led to the drawdown in Chinese equity indices described earlier.

While this type of volatility can be difficult to stomach for most market participants, it can also allow investors the chance to purchase securities at more attractive valuations. To that point, many portfolio managers with a focus on Asian markets have expressed an interest in increasing their exposure to Chinese equities over the coming months given the dislocations that have potentially arisen as a result of the recent pullback, though most still expect market fluctuations to continue in the near term. Investors with exposure to Chinese markets should remain disciplined in their approach and cognizant of both the risks and potential opportunities stemming from the current situation.

Print PDF > China: Regulators, Mount Up!

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.