Category: Chart of the Week

The Dollar Returns to Trend (and Could Go Lower)

The dollar has enjoyed an impressive run during the last few years on the backs of trade restrictions, off-cycle expansionary fiscal policy, and muted inflation. That said, the currency has weakened in recent months, as the U.S. Dollar Index — which measures the strength of the greenback relative to a basket of several international currencies — has dropped nearly 10% since the end of March. The index is now nearing its 30-year average of 91.2.

The dollar could fall even further in the near term given the current landscape. While it is unclear exactly how President-elect Joe Biden will govern along the political spectrum, the new administration will almost certainly take a more dovish approach with respect to international trade. A de-escalation of Trump-era tariff wars would be a boon to emerging market equities, which could create trouble for the dollar. Additionally, the lack of additional fiscal stimulus in the United States after the passage of the CARES Act in March, coupled with unprecedented expansionary efforts by the Federal Reserve, is a harbinger of a weaker greenback. Even a new relief package that is more modest in size may not be enough to prevent a further slide in the dollar given the extraordinary scope of the Fed’s support and a sustained low interest rate environment.

It is important to remember that a declining dollar does not necessarily spell doom for the U.S. economy. Goods produced in the United States become more attractive to consumers when the domestic currency is weak, which can lead to job creation in the manufacturing sector and economic growth. Increased global demand for American goods can also lead to trade deficit reductions. If current trends continue, investors will have to weigh these benefits against the costs of a weakening greenback, which include inflation and subsequent increases in commodity prices, as well as lower relative returns for dollar-denominated assets. Now more than ever, allocators should stress the importance of international and style diversification.

Print PDF > The Dollar Returns to Trend (and Could Go Lower)

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Welcome to Lockdown 2.0

As the market and world-at-large were elated by Pfizer’s announcement of positive trial results for its COVID-19 vaccine this week, we all brace for a winter run of global lockdowns and extensive virus spread mitigation measures. In the last three weeks, a number of European countries have reimposed nationwide limitations. Notably, starting October 30th, France reinstituted its spring lockdown rules which restrict residents to their homes except for trips to buy essential goods, medical appointments, and one hour of physical activity. Germany’s “lockdown light” began on November 2nd, closing all bars, restaurants, and theaters and limiting access to retail shops, though schools remain open. And within the U.S., we have seen several states roll out pandemic constraints as well, including Illinois, Maryland, and Washington.

This chart provides a quick snapshot of COVID-19 case tallies as of November 12th. Soberingly, these figures are rising at a pace much faster than the initial wave. We have seen how the spring cases and restrictions hampered productivity and brought a few nations into recessionary territory. In October, the IMF released revised global GDP growth estimates that were mildly positive, reducing the estimate from -4.9% to -4.4% on the back of eased summer restrictions and an influx of fiscal stimulus. While it is expected that fiscal stimulus measures will continue and could dampen the economic blow, global growth will remain depressed for 2020 and into 2021 as we work through this second wave.

Print PDF > Welcome to Lockdown 2.0

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Early Voter Turnout

Of the many reasons the 2020 election may make history, expected record voter turnout is perhaps the best. By October 22nd, early votes via mail-in ballots and early in-person voting had already surpassed all early voting done in the 2016 general election. Based on last night’s latest estimates, almost 100 million have already voted nationwide, more than 70% of 2016’s high water mark of almost 139 million. Key battleground states Texas, Florida, North Carolina, Georgia, and Nevada have already collected more than 90% of 2016’s total vote.

For states that compare ballots to a voter’s party registration, 45% of early voters have been Democrat and 31% Republican, with the remainder registered with a minor party or without party affiliation. Polls generally report that Republicans are more likely to vote in person on Election Day, so early takeaways are limited.

As we anxiously await election results tonight and over the following days (hopefully not weeks), we can at least be celebratory about how many citizens have performed their civic duty in this election.

Please follow Marquette Research for additional election updates in the coming days, including our take on impacts across asset classes.

Print PDF > Early Voter Turnout

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Record Growth During Third Quarter, but Will It Continue?

In this week’s chart of the week, we look at the estimated growth of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) — the value of all goods and services produced across the economy — for the third quarter of 2020. GDP increased at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 33.1% according to the “advance“ estimate released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. This increase is the largest on record, following a record decline (-31.4%) in the second quarter as COVID-19 severely disrupted business activity across the country. The increase was driven by increases in personal consumption expenditures, private inventory investment, exports, nonresidential fixed investment, and residential fixed investment; detractors were decreases in federal, state, and local government spending. The actual quarter-on-quarter rate of expansion, without annualization, was 7.4%.

Economists expect the economy to expand throughout the fourth quarter though much more slowly compared to the third quarter. Rising COVID-19 cases across certain parts of the country could plunge the economy into turmoil again if states are forced to put tighter restrictions back in place, likely slowing consumption and ultimately, GDP growth. Mitigating factors to these trends are potential vaccine approval and distribution, as well as additional stimulus from the U.S. government. Fourth quarter GDP will undoubtedly hinge on how these themes play out and bear watching over the coming months.

Print PDF > Record Growth During Third Quarter, but Will It Continue?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Will a Vaccine Be the End of COVID-19?

Simmering in the background of the presidential race and stimulus talks remains a crucial step towards fully re-opening the country: vaccine progress. Many experts view the development of a vaccine as the key to finally ending the battle against COVID-19. With a commercially available vaccine anticipated as early as April of 2021, it seemed that we were drawing nearer to the end of restrictions on large gatherings. People would be able to attend sporting events, weddings, and graduations again in a return to more normal life. However, in a startling recent poll of over 34,000 people regarding their interest in receiving a government-approved vaccine, over half said that they would not or are not sure that they would want to receive the vaccine.

The stark difference in responses seems to correlate with education level, as shown in the charts above. There is a significant increase in wanting to receive the vaccine on behalf of people whose education includes a college degree. For education levels below college, the results were much more mixed about receptivity to a vaccine. The most commonly cited reservations were accessibility (cost, wait time, proximity of distribution center/medical office) and effectiveness. Although this was just one poll, it appears that the release of a vaccine may not completely stem the pandemic unless there is a dramatic reversal in vaccine sentiment over the coming months.

Print PDF > Will a Vaccine Be the End of COVID-19?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

ESG AUM Continues to Grow

Over the past five years, there has been a substantial increase in assets under management (“AUM”) for ESG (environmental, social, and corporate governance) mandated funds, as investors are placing greater emphasis on environmental and social issues while realizing that performance is not a tradeoff for sustainable investments. Since 2015, there has been a 147.5% increase in AUM for ESG-mandated funds, specifically looking at U.S. Equity, U.S. Fixed Income, Global Equity, and Global Fixed Income.

Going forward, we expect to see a larger increase in ESG investing as the COVID crisis further unfolds against the backdrop of other significant environmental and social issues. The recent inflows into ESG funds are a combination of new funds and the restructuring of old non-ESG funds. During the first half of 2020, over 20 new ESG funds have been launched in the U.S., making it the sixth consecutive year of 20+ new launches, and the U.S. is expected to set a new record by the end of the year. Clearly this is a trend that is gaining momentum across the investment universe and bears watching in future years. For more information on sustainable investing, reference our Sustainable Investing Video Series.

Print PDF > ESG AUM Continues to Grow

 

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Can Real Assets Help Protect Portfolios from Inflation?

Against the current backdrop of unprecedented monetary stimulus, investors have become increasingly wary of future inflation and its potential degenerative effect on portfolio returns. While deflationary pressures appear more likely in the near term, the COVID-driven stimulus packages have created the potential for inflation once the pandemic has subsided. Predictably, investors are contemplating which asset classes can help hedge inflationary risk and real assets are a natural asset class to offset this risk.

During periods of upward price pressure, both real estate and infrastructure funds have at least some degree of pricing power, meaning they can boost rental income and revenue streams from their underlying holdings. In some cases, the embedded lease and contractual agreements of these holdings are linked to an inflation index, particularly for infrastructure. Therefore, the incomes of such holdings will rise as inflation rises and thus unlike fixed rate bonds, the real rate of return will not be eroded.

In order to examine this hypothesis, we compared traditional asset classes — stocks and bonds — to the real assets mentioned above: real estate and infrastructure. We compared cumulative returns during periods of above average inflation and during positive inflation surprises.¹ Although data is limited for real assets (particularly infrastructure), we analyzed cumulative returns for these four asset classes back to the earliest common date of index inception. Since the 2006 inception of the FTSE core infrastructure index, both real estate and infrastructure assets significantly outperformed U.S. equities and bonds during all periods when U.S. CPI rose above the period’s historical YOY average (1.9%). And during all quarters over the same period when developed world inflation experienced a material positive shock (“positive inflation surprises” defined previously), real assets also significantly outperformed both bonds and equities. Thus, while we have only experienced marginal inflationary pressure over the past 15 years, the data indicates that the inflation hedging mechanisms of real estate and infrastructure assets have been effective in protecting the purchasing power of portfolios. While it is difficult to forecast the ultimate timing, duration, and magnitude of inflation from this point forward, it is clear that real assets should offer a degree of insulation from the adverse effects of inflation.

Print PDF > Can Real Assets Help Protect Portfolios from Inflation?

¹ Surprises to developed world inflation are defined as periods where the expectations to the GDP weighted CPIs of the U.S., UK, and EU were below the actual CPI level by more than 10 bps.

 

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

EM: Less About “ME” and More About “IT”

In 2010, the emerging markets equity benchmark was all about “ME” as materials and energy constituted 28% of MSCI’s Emerging Markets Equity Index. Today, however, they account for half of that, and IT and Consumer Discretionary have nearly doubled, growing from 19% in 2010 to 34% in 2020.

In September of 2018, MSCI adjusted its sector classification standards, partially in response to the increasing integration of the internet into all aspects of our communication and business transactions. This change specifically reclassified e-commerce to include companies providing online marketplaces for consumer products and services in the Consumer Discretionary sector rather than their previous IT classification. Alibaba — the largest stock in the index and one of the largest internet-based companies in the world — serves as one example of a company reclassified under the 2018 standards.

Emerging Markets have become less reliant on commodity prices over the past decade and we see this as a positive. Investors can benefit from the larger investment opportunity set which includes companies that are capitalizing on technology trends that played out in the U.S. throughout the 2010s and continue today, including e-commerce, online payment processing, and social platform businesses.

For more coverage on the Emerging Markets Index, reference our recent newsletter, The Changing Landscape in EM Equity.

Print PDF > EM: Less About “ME” and More About “IT”

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

The Year of SPACs

If there is one corner of the financial market that has benefited from the pandemic, it is special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs). This atypical pathway to the public markets was once a niche strategy for small investment firms. Now, the strategy has become one of the hottest financial topics of 2020 after a massive uptick in the volume of these vehicles.

A record 82 special purpose acquisition corporations went public this year to raise a record $39 billion, far exceeding the $9.5 billion in gross proceeds for SPACs in 2019 or the $8.5 billion in 2018.

SPACs are vehicles that raise money in an IPO, and then place the funds in a trust while the sponsor searches for a business or multiple businesses to acquire. The companies then complete a merger and the target becomes a listed stock.

A private company going public via SPAC has a few advantages over a traditional IPO. Private companies can go public on a faster timeline and there is more certainty around a company’s valuation. Furthermore, the listing of a SPAC requires a much lower level of diligence than a similarly sized IPO since there are no financial statements to analyze. For a sponsor, raising a SPAC is similar to raising a closed-end fund, allowing for a shorter and more comfortable timeline during the fundraise. In addition, the reputation of SPACs has improved over the past decades as governance practices have been refined and made more shareholder-friendly.

The volatility and price declines earlier in 2020 made IPOs and direct listings impractical options for many private companies, which is where SPACs have stepped in. There has been a lot of talk particularly in the venture community not being satisfied with the IPO process. That has led to conversations about going the direct listing route, and now the SPAC route. There have been several companies that have gone the IPO route and set a price underwriters deemed reasonable, only to see the stock surge on the first day of trading, which ultimately results in money being left on the table. And with IPOs being inherently riskier, there was less incentive to take on more risk by going public during an election year and pandemic.

It is clear SPACs are here to stay, but it is uncertain whether they will continue at the same rapid pace as this year. While the population of companies that might combine with a SPAC is growing, it still represents a small subset of private companies, limiting the potential disruption of the traditional IPO process. While the momentum driving innovation around public listings is encouraging, SPACs will not provide a solution for every private business. That said, there is a two-year time period for a SPAC to acquire a business, guaranteeing they will remain around for at least the foreseeable future.

Print PDF > The Year of SPACs

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

A Key Rebalancing Consideration: Drawdowns

In times of market turbulence, investments may sustain peak-to-trough declines known as drawdowns. The COVID-induced drawdown in March was no exception. Our chart this week illustrates the drawdown history for core bonds, bank loans, high yield bonds, and hard currency sovereign emerging markets debt (“EMD”) compared with the S&P 500. While past performance is not indicative of future returns, historical drawdown risk associated with past market volatility is a helpful metric to consider in the recovery from the current global health pandemic. As evident in the chart, each of the fixed income plus sectors¹ is correlated with the S&P 500, but the magnitude of plus sector drawdown risk is much less than the magnitude of equity drawdown risk — with one notable exception. In the 1990s EMD exhibited larger drawdowns than equity. At that time, EMD was very thinly traded, less mature, and more susceptible to dramatic swings.

While rebalancing from equity to fixed income plus sectors increases credit risk and introduces some drawdown risk, the magnitude of that drawdown risk from plus sectors is expected to be less than the expected drawdown risk from equity. As such, in this low Treasury yield environment, we recommend that investors consider both fixed income plus sectors and equity as ways to achieve greater total return potential and yield in portfolios. A diversified portfolio that takes advantage of the lower correlations between bank loans, high yield, EMD, and equities may benefit from greater efficiency and a higher Sharpe ratio in addition to the lower-magnitude drawdown risk from plus sectors.

Print PDF > A Key Rebalancing Consideration: Drawdowns

¹Bank loans, high yield bonds, and emerging markets debt.

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.