Category: Chart of the Week

Record Flows: Another Headwind for Active Management

Fund flows, which measure the net movement of assets into and out of investment vehicles like mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”), can provide a window into investor behavior and are often an indication of investor sentiment. Strong inflows can indicate optimism within a particular asset class or investment style, while outflows may suggest pessimism on the part of investors. That said, a robust market is not always supported by investor inflows, as underlying fund flows and market index performance frequently deviate. This phenomenon was on display in 2020 and merits further evaluation.

The S&P 500 index posted a double-digit return in 2020 and closed the year at an all-time high, despite record-breaking outflows from U.S. equity funds. Nearly $241 billion flew out of domestic equity funds in 2020, a figure that is more than four times the previous calendar year record set in 2015. Perhaps unsurprisingly, these outflows centered predominately around actively managed products, a trend that has been persistent since 2014. Active funds saw net outflows in every month of 2020, while passive funds enjoyed bursts of investor interest, with extreme net inflows in both March (after the market bottomed) and November (due to positive coronavirus vaccine news). Investor preference for ETFs over mutual funds is particularly noteworthy. ETFs have risen in popularity as a lower-cost alternative to mutual fund investing and carry little-to-no investment minimum with real-time pricing. In November, passive ETFs saw a staggering net inflow of more than $54 billion, which is $12 billion more than the last monthly record set in December of 2016. This historic net inflow provided a tailwind to an already optimistic investor base and propelled indices like the Russell 2000 index, which tracks the U.S. small-cap market, to post its strongest returning month on record.

Hefty inflows for passive vehicles, like those in November, can have unfortunate implications for active investment managers. Many of these investment professionals are constructing a relatively small basket of securities with the intent to outperform a benchmark, often with less risk, over the long term. Commonly, these managers focus on quality metrics like top line growth, gross margins, earnings, and lower debt levels to drive outperformance. When a wave of inflows hits passive products, we see a “rising tide lifts all boats” phenomenon that is largely detached from underlying stock fundamentals. This can cause a short-term price dislocation and distortion of investor sentiment. Ultimately, the immediate impact of fund flows is temporary, but the continued trend away from active management may pose a greater threat to the asset management industry if portfolio managers fail to improve benchmark-relative performance.

Print PDF > Record Flows: Another Headwind for Active Management

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Bubble, Bubble, Toil, and Trouble

In Shakespeare’s Scottish play Macbeth, three witches prophesize the protagonist’s imminent rise and fall. This week, Deutsche Bank released its mid-January survey highlighting 627 global market professionals’ feelings of the market’s current state. The survey’s arguably most somber statistic showed that 89% of respondents believe there are currently bubbles in the financial markets. As seen in previous events, we know that bubbles have dire consequences for financial markets. In particular, U.S. tech stocks and Bitcoin were the two assets that respondents believe are the most likely bubbles waiting for a correction. As of January 19th, Bitcoin has soared over 320% and the Nasdaq index is up over 43% in the past year. Due to digital currencies’ nascency, particularly Bitcoin, it is almost impossible to glean any insight from past performance.

Moreover, much of Bitcoin’s future value will be driven by its overall acceptance by financial institutions and its finite supply. Alternatively, investors have decades of Nasdaq data and have experienced market bubbles such as the Dot-com Bubble and the Global Financial Crisis. If history is our guide, the Nasdaq’s current PE ratio of approximately 26 is mild relative to a P/E ratio of 70 seen in 2006 and a fraction of its peak of 175 witnessed in 2000.¹ While a P/E ratio is not a perfect gauge for market bubbles, neither is recent strong performance. Since 1975, of the ten years that the Nasdaq has eclipsed a 30% positive return, only two of the years was the index negative the following year, 1981 and 2000.

If the Deutsche Bank survey is correct, this might be the most well-forecasted bubble in financial history, and if we have learned anything from previous financial bubbles, we know they are tough to predict. Macbeth’s witches were able to predict the future down to the smallest details with powers not held by financial market harbingers. Regardless, surveys give investors powerful insight into the mood and sentiment of financial professionals, but it is up to them to plan accordingly. Much has been learned over the past year as 2020 will remain front of mind for investors for years to come. Since the market bottom in March, many asset classes have benefited from a swift and steady rally, posting strong gains in 2020. Furthermore, the market has felt disconnected from the overall economy, which continues to struggle with the fallout of the COVID pandemic and has caused investors to question, “How long can this continue?” Driven by record-low interest rates, investors allocating to risk assets should remain mindful of future return expectations and potential volatility at current valuation levels.

Print PDF > Bubble, Bubble, Toil, and Trouble

¹ Bloomberg

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Glass Half Full?

As we are beginning to see a possible finish line on the COVID-19 front, there is an expectation in the market that vaccine-assisted re-openings globally will bring about a return to pre-pandemic economic productivity levels. The “Great Lockdown” of 2020 caused many countries around the world to enter a deep recession, which, like former hard resets, has impacted societal behaviors (i.e., social distancing) and reframed business operations and outlooks (i.e., increased safety measures and focus on supply chain). It is fair to say that some industries and segments of the market may have been permanently changed by the pandemic, be it in a positive or negative manner. While we welcome the return to normalcy — or even the new normal — it is important for investors to be mindful of a few things with respect to this economic reversal: 1) the market has largely priced in this turnaround story, 2) continued accommodative monetary policy and large fiscal stimulus packages are providing the support to restart the economic engine, and 3) any hiccups in national inoculation plans and vaccine distribution could sidetrack progress.

Hence, our glass is half full when it comes to sustaining global growth expectations in 2021. As shown in today’s chart, the IMF’s estimate of the global GDP growth rate is expected to come in at -4.4% for 2020. This is a less severe contraction than estimated in June 2020, which showed a more dire COVID-19 impact on economic activity. For 2021, the global GDP growth rate is projected to lampoon to +5.2%, due to a wide negative output gap and a gradually immunized workforce. Of note, China is the only country expected to post a positive GDP growth rate for 2020 and 2021, as it continues to show leadership in restoring and maintaining economic activity. As 2021 plays out, the actual growth numbers across the globe versus what has been projected will be followed and reported upon closely and will undoubtedly have an impact on financial markets. Among vaccine roll-out, efficacy, a new administration in Washington, and a host of other geopolitical factors, global GDP bears watching, especially the first half of the year.

Print PDF > Glass Half Full?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Is Velocity Stifling Inflation Amid Record Growth of Money Supply?

Inflation has remained well below 3% in the United States for nearly a decade despite a record economic expansion and supportive monetary policy. Even after unprecedented alterations to the macroeconomic landscape in recent months, investors have not seen the significant price level increases that might have been expected in theory. This puzzling situation may be at least partially explained by the current relationship between money supply and velocity.

When it comes to economic relief efforts in the U.S. during 2020, no entity has been more active than the Federal Reserve, which has increasingly relied on open market operations with short-term interest rates near zero. Since the start of the pandemic, the Fed has purchased $3.5 trillion in Treasuries, corporate bonds, and mortgage-backed securities, and recently announced its intention to press forward with $120 billion per month in additional bond buying. The central bank’s balance sheet has now ballooned to over $7 trillion. As a result, M2 ­— a measure of the total money supply that includes narrow money, cash equivalents, and short-term deposits — spiked by roughly 25% in 2020, a record year-over-year growth figure.¹ The recent M2 surge has been accompanied by a decrease in the velocity of money, calculated as the ratio of quarterly nominal GDP to the quarterly average of M2 money stock. Put simply, velocity denotes the rate of turnover in the money supply and is a gauge of economic health, as higher velocity is usually associated with more robust economic activity. Since the beginning of 2020, money velocity has fallen by more than 20%, indicating a strong preference for saving vs. spending on the part of the American consumer since the outbreak of COVID-19.

The relationship between money supply and velocity has significant implications for security markets going forward, particularly as it relates to inflation. Investors have long been confounded by the absence of inflation in the U.S. since low interest rates and M2 growth should lead to higher price levels all else equal. Part of the reason for the lack of inflation could be lower levels of money velocity, which has largely declined since 2000 amid three significant recessions in the United States. The recent plunge in velocity may signal to central bankers that expansionary efforts could be continued in the near term without the risk of significant price level increases. As the economic recovery continues, however, velocity will necessarily rise, which could lead to interest rate hikes and the tapering of the Fed balance sheet to prevent runaway inflation. Investors should be cognizant of the possibility of restrictive monetary policy in the coming years as the world lifts itself out of recession.

Print PDF > Is Velocity Stifling Inflation Amid Record Growth of Money Supply

¹As measured on November 30, 2020

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Market Recovery: Superpower Showdown

Despite the enormous challenges of 2020, financial markets have rebounded. While baffling at face value, the contrast between market performance and the widespread suffering due to COVID-19 is more understandable in the context of markets as a representation of human ingenuity and resiliency. These two traits are perhaps most recognized in the world’s foremost economic superpowers: The United States and the People’s Republic of China. During the third week of March, both countries saw market drawdowns near 30%; most other equity indices across the world saw similar drops. Since the global market bottom, countries have been racing to make up these losses and charge ahead to new highs. As of December 11th, America’s recovery has been nearly a third stronger than China’s. Globally, the recovery has fallen in between these two world powers.

A dollar invested in American public equities on March 23rd would have grown to $1.72 as of last Friday, December 11th, as represented by the Russell 3000 (representing approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market¹). Over this same time span, a dollar invested in China would have driven an increase to $1.54, as represented by the MSCI China Index. This broad market index captures 85% of China’s equity universe and includes the variety of share classes available to both strictly domestic Chinese investors as well as foreign investors.² However, America’s strength in capital markets recovery does not reflect the country’s relative success in managing the virus. In the U.S., the fight drags on, while much of China has returned to business as usual.³ Broadly, capital markets as measured by the All Country World Index (ACWI) — which contains 85% of the global equity markets, including 23 developed countries and 26 developing countries² — has rebounded at a clip between that of the U.S. and China. The good news for investors is that equity markets — regardless of home country — have rebounded from the extreme drops seen in March and April.

As detailed in our previous Chart of the Week, “Main Street Won’t Look Like Wall Street for a While,” the real-world experience of many Americans is one of continued economic hardship. While this desperate situation may soon be addressed with additional stimulus, Americans and people around the globe can also find hope in the fact that markets are forward-looking and humans, by nature, are resilient and resourceful. As a testament to this, one needs to look no further than the rollout of the highly anticipated and historic COVID-19 vaccine, which saw its first doses administered in the U.S on Monday.⁴ The extreme market volatility and large sell-off early in the year and subsequent recovery have further underscored why a long-term investment perspective rooted in a fundamental confidence in continual technological and economic progress is the most effective mindset an investor can have.

Print PDF > Market Recovery: Superpower Showdown

¹ FTSE Russell
² MSCI
³ China is back to normal — the US and Europe are not. Here’s how it succeeded
⁴ First Covid-19 Vaccine Given to U.S. Public

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Main Street Won’t Look Like Wall Street for a While

The month of November is often a positive one for equity markets, with the S&P 500 Index posting positive returns 62% of the time, and November 2020 was surely one for the record books. The Dow Jones Index, designed to serve as a proxy for the health of the broader U.S. economy, posted its best monthly return since 1987. Smaller companies also rallied in November as the Russell 2000 Index, which tracks U.S. small-capitalization stocks, set its first record high since 2018 and posted its strongest monthly return ever. That said, a stark contrast emerges when these milestones are viewed beside other economic indicators, particularly unemployment.

Down 54.4% from the April 2020 peak, U.S. national unemployment came in at 6.7% for November. This is exceptionally positive news considering the recent figure is only 0.6% above its 15-year average. However, this aggregated unemployment measure does not highlight the significant disparity plaguing the broader employment landscape.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the labor market can be divided into 22 unique occupation groups, many of which have been hit harder by the COVID-19-induced recession than others. For example — and perhaps not surprisingly — the four groups most affected by the pandemic include those on the frontlines of human interaction, such as Personal Care & Service, Food Preparation & Serving, Transport & Material Moving, and Building Grounds & Cleaning. While it is clear from the chart that these occupations tend to have a slightly higher rate of unemployment than the national figure, the average November unemployment rate for these groups was a significant 10.7%, coming in 4% higher than the current national level and 2.9% higher than the long-term average of the same groups. Conversely, occupation groups including Healthcare Practitioners, Legal, Computer & Mathematical, and Architecture & Engineering have escaped COVID-19 largely unscathed. These groups posted an average rate of 2.4% unemployment in November, which is 4.4% below the current national level and, in fact, 0.2% lower than their own long-term average. The gravity of this disparity takes on new meaning when viewed through the lens of workforce concentration and wealth generation. The least affected occupation groups employ 11.6% of the workforce, while the most affected groups have nearly double the employee base, at 23.0%. To make matters worse, this larger workforce earns substantially less than their COVID-sheltered peers. According to 2019 data, the most affected groups earned a median annual income of $27,800, which is just over the poverty line for a family of four and $12,000 less than the median income for all occupation groups. On the other hand, for those occupation groups nearing full employment, the median worker earned an annual income of $79,900 in 2019, more than two times the national median.

Ultimately, no two recessions are the same, but perspective can be gleaned by looking to the past. Since 1950, the average U.S. unemployment rate has been a low 5.8%, despite 10 unique bear market corrections during that time. However, the subsequent decline from a spike in unemployment can be slow and long. Looking back to the Global Financial Crisis, U.S. unemployment peaked at 10% in October 2009 and took just over six years to recover back to pre-crisis levels. However, unlike other recessions we have seen in recent memory, this one seems to have a discernible cure: a COVID-19 vaccine. With national distribution beginning before the end of the year, many analysts are expecting the economy to return to ‘normal’ by mid-2021. An unprecedented level of stimulus has already been injected into the economy and an additional highly anticipated package expected to arrive early next year are added reasons for optimism. Taken together, there is hope that current unemployment figures will revert to typical levels at a pace not seen in history.

Print PDF > Main Street Won’t Look Like Wall Street for a While

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Is Growth Conceding?

The market’s continued rally following the U.S. election has been a welcome relief, even more so for value investors. Since major media outlets called the presidential race for now President-elect Biden on November 7th, the Russell 1000 Value Index has outperformed the Russell 1000 Growth Index by 6.6%, and at one point by more than 10%. It has been the strongest value run since the dot-com bubble burst in 2001. The Monday following the result, November 9th, was the best single day for value over growth ever.

Presidential elections and other regime changes can often spark a rotation within the market. In this case, in addition to expectations for additional stimulus post the election, the delayed election results lined up with Pfizer’s announcement — and the peer announcements that followed — that its COVID-19 vaccine candidate was found to be more than 90% effective. Stocks generally, but in particular, more cyclical businesses and industries most impacted by the pandemic, rallied and have continued to gain momentum. Banks are up 20% and Energy stocks more than 30%. Technology and Healthcare have lagged despite the Republican gains in Congress that subsequently reduced the risk of sweeping regulatory changes.

The question now is whether value can maintain this momentum. Interestingly, the move is reminiscent of the period following the 2016 election. From the election on November 8th, 2016 to a peak in mid-December, value had outpaced growth by 5%. Financials, along with Energy and Basic Materials, led at that point as well, though for different reasons, set to benefit from expected regulatory rollbacks, tax cuts, and protectionist trade policies. Technology unsurprisingly lagged following Trump’s attacks on Tech bellwethers throughout his campaign. But the high expectations fizzled as Trump’s agenda hit roadblocks. In 2016, value’s advantage lasted roughly a month, with growth back on top by mid-March 2017. Only time will tell how market dynamics will play out this time. Relative to growth, value is trading at some of the most attractive valuations ever. But several of the same trends that led to growth’s dominance over the last decade, and certainly this year, are also arguably stronger than ever.

Print PDF > Is Growth Conceding?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

The Dollar Returns to Trend (and Could Go Lower)

The dollar has enjoyed an impressive run during the last few years on the backs of trade restrictions, off-cycle expansionary fiscal policy, and muted inflation. That said, the currency has weakened in recent months, as the U.S. Dollar Index — which measures the strength of the greenback relative to a basket of several international currencies — has dropped nearly 10% since the end of March. The index is now nearing its 30-year average of 91.2.

The dollar could fall even further in the near term given the current landscape. While it is unclear exactly how President-elect Joe Biden will govern along the political spectrum, the new administration will almost certainly take a more dovish approach with respect to international trade. A de-escalation of Trump-era tariff wars would be a boon to emerging market equities, which could create trouble for the dollar. Additionally, the lack of additional fiscal stimulus in the United States after the passage of the CARES Act in March, coupled with unprecedented expansionary efforts by the Federal Reserve, is a harbinger of a weaker greenback. Even a new relief package that is more modest in size may not be enough to prevent a further slide in the dollar given the extraordinary scope of the Fed’s support and a sustained low interest rate environment.

It is important to remember that a declining dollar does not necessarily spell doom for the U.S. economy. Goods produced in the United States become more attractive to consumers when the domestic currency is weak, which can lead to job creation in the manufacturing sector and economic growth. Increased global demand for American goods can also lead to trade deficit reductions. If current trends continue, investors will have to weigh these benefits against the costs of a weakening greenback, which include inflation and subsequent increases in commodity prices, as well as lower relative returns for dollar-denominated assets. Now more than ever, allocators should stress the importance of international and style diversification.

Print PDF > The Dollar Returns to Trend (and Could Go Lower)

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Welcome to Lockdown 2.0

As the market and world-at-large were elated by Pfizer’s announcement of positive trial results for its COVID-19 vaccine this week, we all brace for a winter run of global lockdowns and extensive virus spread mitigation measures. In the last three weeks, a number of European countries have reimposed nationwide limitations. Notably, starting October 30th, France reinstituted its spring lockdown rules which restrict residents to their homes except for trips to buy essential goods, medical appointments, and one hour of physical activity. Germany’s “lockdown light” began on November 2nd, closing all bars, restaurants, and theaters and limiting access to retail shops, though schools remain open. And within the U.S., we have seen several states roll out pandemic constraints as well, including Illinois, Maryland, and Washington.

This chart provides a quick snapshot of COVID-19 case tallies as of November 12th. Soberingly, these figures are rising at a pace much faster than the initial wave. We have seen how the spring cases and restrictions hampered productivity and brought a few nations into recessionary territory. In October, the IMF released revised global GDP growth estimates that were mildly positive, reducing the estimate from -4.9% to -4.4% on the back of eased summer restrictions and an influx of fiscal stimulus. While it is expected that fiscal stimulus measures will continue and could dampen the economic blow, global growth will remain depressed for 2020 and into 2021 as we work through this second wave.

Print PDF > Welcome to Lockdown 2.0

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Early Voter Turnout

Of the many reasons the 2020 election may make history, expected record voter turnout is perhaps the best. By October 22nd, early votes via mail-in ballots and early in-person voting had already surpassed all early voting done in the 2016 general election. Based on last night’s latest estimates, almost 100 million have already voted nationwide, more than 70% of 2016’s high water mark of almost 139 million. Key battleground states Texas, Florida, North Carolina, Georgia, and Nevada have already collected more than 90% of 2016’s total vote.

For states that compare ballots to a voter’s party registration, 45% of early voters have been Democrat and 31% Republican, with the remainder registered with a minor party or without party affiliation. Polls generally report that Republicans are more likely to vote in person on Election Day, so early takeaways are limited.

As we anxiously await election results tonight and over the following days (hopefully not weeks), we can at least be celebratory about how many citizens have performed their civic duty in this election.

Please follow Marquette Research for additional election updates in the coming days, including our take on impacts across asset classes.

Print PDF > Early Voter Turnout

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.