U.S Economy Archives — Page 47 of 62

Are Equities Oversold?

After an extended period of historically low volatility and steady gains in U.S. equity markets, the first significant pullback for U.S. equities since February 2016 has transpired over the last week. Through February 8th, the DJIA and S&P 500 each traded below their January 26th all-time closing highs by 10.4% and 9.7%, respectively. In 2017 the DJIA posted a record 71 new closing highs while the S&P 500 notched 62 new closing highs, its second highest in history. The upward trend continued into January 2018 with both DJIA and S&P continuing to record 11 and 14 additional new closing highs.

With the sharp return of volatility to a bull market that is already long in duration, investors are rightfully feeling a bit jittery right about now. The catalyst for the recent sell-off began with last week’s employment report showing faster than expected wage growth. This created concern that inflation could rise faster than expected. Under this scenario, the Fed would be forced to raise short-term rates at a quicker pace than what is currently being priced into the market. Only time will tell if this was simply a long overdue pullback as part of a normally functioning market, or the start of further price deterioration. While the bull market is long by historical standards and valuations are near the upper end of their historical ranges, economic and corporate fundamentals do not appear to signal warning signs. With such uncertainty, it can be helpful to look towards technical signals for clues.

This week’s chart looks at a popular technical indicator, the Relative Strength Index (RSI). This indicator measures the degree of recent gains and losses for a security or index over a specified period, typically 14 days, to identify overbought or oversold conditions. Its calculation captures both the speed and magnitude of price movements. RSI values range between 0 and 100, however RSI values of 70 or above are generally considered overbought and likely to experience a trend reversal. Likewise, RSI values of 30 or below are generally considered oversold and likely to experience a trend reversal to the upside. RSI values can remain in overbought or oversold territory for extended periods of time, so it is not until that value crosses these threshold levels again that a bottom or top is considered as being potentially formed. At the January 26th close, the DJIA’s RSI measured 88.7 and had been in overbought territory since late 2017. With the recent pullback, the DJIA’s RSI quickly dropped to 29.5 as of February 5th. The following three trading days produced large price swings, but ultimately these indices have continued to trade lower. Currently at 30.4, RSI for the DJIA is thus far holding above the oversold threshold. While a technically oversold level may foreshadow a future potential uptrend, investors should not place too much weight on any one indicator.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

You Get a Dividend, You Get a Dividend, You Get a Dividend!

As January closes, it is not uncommon for New Year’s resolutions to go up in smoke; one publication has suggested that as many as 80% of commitments for change are gone come February.¹ Regardless, many such resolutions target weight loss in the New Year, and an obvious winner in this game would seem to be Weight Watchers. However, January’s performance for this stock appears surprisingly unrelated to news of increased subscribers. Instead, it appears that the influential figurehead Oprah Winfrey had an unanticipated — and unconventional — impact on Weight Watcher’s January performance.

Since Oprah took a 10% stake and joined the board of directors at Weight Watchers in late 2015, her $43 million investment has grown to exceed $400 million. Compare that 847% growth to the S&P’s 39% increase and the Oprah effect cannot be denied. Her powerful speech at the Golden Globes on January 7th incited social media to explode with excitement over a theorized 2020 run for the presidency. Weight Watchers shares jumped over 12% the Monday following her speech and an additional 9% the next day; the stock continued to climb through January, though this was likely due to more typical reasons such as the company’s strong growth outlook. Once news broke on the 25th that Oprah was officially not planning to run for president, shares tumbled 7% intraday and ended the month down 5% from their January peak.

An announcement from a board member regarding a lack of intent to run for president is certainly not a typical cause for a depression in stock price, and this situation is only a recent example of the growing importance of a company’s brand. Stock prices are no longer solely affected by their fundamentals; a seemingly unrelated blip in the news cycle can now blow up on social media and essentially override a company’s true fundamentals to impact its share price. While an event like this can be unpredictable, it forces management across all industries to have a stronger brand awareness, which is ultimately a good thing as it can lead to increased responsiveness to consumer feedback. As it relates to portfolio management, actively managed funds that can successfully account for this trend are more likely to outperform both their peers and respective indices. As capital markets unfold in 2018, this is a pattern that bears watching.

Print PDF

2018 Market Preview

Each year, investors face numerous questions that can impact their portfolios, and 2018 is no different. How will tax reform further impact the capital markets? How much – and often – will the Fed raise rates in the coming year? Can international equities continue to outperform their U.S. counterparts? Should we be concerned about the levels of dry powder in the private equity market? These topics among many others are covered in the following articles as we offer our annual market preview newsletters. In the links below, readers will find a preview newsletter for each asset class that we cover, as well as a general U.S. economic preview. Each article contains insightful analysis and key themes to monitor over the coming year, themes which will underlie the actual performance of the asset classes covered. We hope that this set of articles can assist you and your committees as you plan for 2018. Should you have any questions about any of the content, please feel free to contact myself or any of the authors or consultants here at Marquette. We also have a webinar recording available by request if you would like to hear a high-level presentation of the topics presented in these articles. Happy New Year!

U.S. Economy by Jeffrey Hoffmeyer, CFA, Lead Analyst, Asset Allocation

Fixed Income by Ben Mohr, CFA, Senior Research Analyst, Fixed Income

U.S. Equities by Samantha T. Grant, CFA, CAIA, Senior Research Analyst, U.S. Equities & Rob Britenbach, CIPM, Research Analyst, U.S. Equities

Non-U.S. Equities by David Hernandez, CFA, Senior Research Analyst, International Equities

Real Estate by Jeremy Zirin, CAIA, Senior Research Analyst, Real Assets

Infrastructure by Jeremy Zirin, CAIA, Senior Research Analyst, Real Assets

Hedge Funds by Joe McGuane, Senior Research Analyst, Alternatives

Private Equity by Derek Schmidt, CFA, CAIA, Senior Research Analyst, Private Equity

Alpha Returned in 2017, But What About 2018?

Equity hedge strategies were the best performing hedge fund strategy in 2017, as alpha was generated on both the long and short side. This chart shows that net alpha bounced back nicely from 2016, as the 2017 environment was much better for active management. Alpha was generated on the short side during the first half of the year, but trailed off as the bull market continued to move higher.

Another factor that helped equity hedge strategies was the decline in correlations during the year. An environment with lower correlations among stocks is positive for active managers, particularly those who maintain both long and short positions.

For alpha generation to continue in 2018, correlations between stocks will need to stay low, with meaningful sector dispersion. Coupled with the continued effort to remove global monetary stimulus, we would expect managers to benefit from these conditions.

Print PDF

Will the Fed Prevent the Yield Curve from Inverting?

The U.S. Treasury yield curve is flatter today than it was at the end of the Great Recession in 2009. This week’s chart examines how flat the curve is now, and the potential for further flattening, possible inversion, or potential steepening. The 10s minus 2s steepness shown in the chart is the 2-year Treasury yield subtracted from the 10-year Treasury yield.

In general, a steep yield curve signifies a growing economy and a bullish market, as long-term bonds must provide greater yields to keep up with future growth. On the other hand, an inverted yield curve signifies a shrinking economy and a bearish market, as investors buy long-term bonds as safe havens, thereby driving their prices up and lowering their yields. As we can see from the chart, the yield curve inverted prior to the 2000 tech bubble burst and prior to the 2008 Great Recession.

With the Tax Cut now signed and underway, we would theoretically expect the yield curve to steepen as the market expects stronger economic growth. However, in the fourth quarter of 2017 — as the legislation gained momentum through Congress and was ultimately signed into law by Trump — the yield curve flattened instead. This is a possible sign that much of the tax stimulus may have already been priced into assets.

Previous Fed Chairs Greenspan and Bernanke both said the economy would be fine after the yield curve inverted in 2000 and 2008, respectively. Going forward, we may expect that the new Fed Chair Jerome Powell will be more cautious in preventing inversion.

Prospects for curve steepening still exist, as inflation — which rose recently — may continue to rise as the economy benefits from the Tax Cut. Rising inflation would then be expected to raise the long end of the yield curve. However, we continue to see the mitigating effect of overseas reach for yield, as U.S. rates across the curve still outyield rates from the rest of the developed markets. Non-U.S. pensions, insurers, and banks continuing to buy long U.S. bonds may drive up prices and keep yields low on that segment of the curve.

Given the flat yield curve, we recommend maintaining an allocation to core bonds for yield, diversification, and principal protection, as well as the inherent moderate duration position.

Print PDF

Oil Market Disruption for 2018 is Closer to Home

Iran, one of the largest exporters of oil, rang in 2018 with a wave of political demonstrations across the country. Citizens gathered to protest Iran’s spiraling economic conditions, which include a 12% unemployment rate, high inflation, and elevated prices of basic goods such as eggs and dairy products. While energy analysts monitor such geopolitical events with due concern, the consensus is that the Iran riots have not caused a significant disruption of supply to the global oil market.

Instead, analysts are pointing to elevated oil production in the U.S., and the subsequent decline in imports. As depicted in this week’s Chart of the Week, net imports of oil to the U.S. dropped more than 65% in the past decade due to rising domestic production. Numerous U.S. shale drillers have pledged to expand exploration if crude oil prices hold above $60, driving imports down even further.

This rise in U.S. oil production has proved a headache for the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and its affiliates, which have actively restrained output since 2016 in hopes of buoying prices. These cutbacks have successfully reduced oil inventories in these countries and the output restraint is set to remain in place through the end of this year. However, global supplies remain high and OPEC’s plan depends on continued compliance from its members. These factors coupled with U.S. production momentum could keep oil prices in check through 2018.

Print PDF

How Will Tax Reform Impact Asset Class Returns?

On December 20, 2017, Congress passed the final version of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act (H.R. 1). This tax reform bill is estimated to be a $1.5 trillion tax cut and represents the most significant reform to the U.S. tax code since the 1986 tax cut passed under President Reagan. This newsletter will address the most important changes as it relates to the economy, markets, and our client portfolios.

Download PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice nor an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Is the Private Equity Market Overvalued?

Most institutional investors generally expect lower future returns at this point of the economic cycle as valuations remain inflated across all asset classes. Nevertheless, investors still seek attractive opportunities which provide potential for stronger relative returns. We continue to see robust fundraising in the private equity industry as investors are attracted to the current fundamentals as well as the long-term excess returns the industry has generated.

Valuations have continued to increase across the private equity industry, partly as a result of improving fundamentals of small businesses in the U.S., and partly as a result of an increasingly attractive sellers’ market, with strategic and financial buyers anticipated to deploy capital over the next few years. These valuations, now averaging 10.5x EBITDA, still remain well below the public markets. Throughout this growth cycle private valuations have not inflated as significantly as they have in the public markets. As seen in the chart, over the last decade valuations in private equity have ranged between a 20-40% discount to the Russell 2000. We believe this persistently lower valuation in a relatively expensive market should continue to attract capital from valuation sensitive investors as they rebalance portfolios heading into 2018.

Print PDF

Is the Federal Reserve Poised to Turn Hawkish?

As America’s central bank, the Federal Reserve is tasked with the important power of keeping our nation’s employment and inflation within a range that is conducive to prosperity. The Fed does this by controlling interest rates. By keeping interest rates low, the Fed enables businesses to borrow more easily, thereby increasing employment, but at the risk of raising inflation to levels that could be too high. In Fed-speak, the Fed is being dovish when it keeps rates low to stimulate the economy — stepping on the gas versus pumping the brakes. On the other hand, if the Fed raises interest rates, it is harder for businesses to borrow, thereby containing inflation, but at the risk of raising unemployment. In this case, the Fed is hawkish when it raises rates to rein in the economy — pumping the brakes.

This week’s chart looks at the dovishness or hawkishness of the Federal Open Market Committee, the committee within the Federal Reserve that sets interest rates. The committee is going through much change: Jerome Powell — a dove — was recently nominated by Trump to Fed Chair starting in 2018 and was affirmed by the Senate. Janet Yellen — a dove — will be stepping down as Fed Chair at the end of this year. Randal Quarles — a centrist — recently joined the committee.

The Fed publishes the committee’s membership for each of the next three years. By assessing the recent speeches and papers from each member, we constructed a Dove-O-Meter to show how dovish or hawkish the group is expected to be. It is important to note that the Fed board of governors, which comprises a large portion of the Federal Open Market Committee, will have four empty seats out of seven total once Yellen steps down, so there may be some change to the dovishness or hawkishness of the group as Trump continues to nominate more people. However, with the members that we know will be on the committee, we can expect a relatively centrist Fed in 2018 and a relatively dovish Fed in 2019 and 2020, as shown in the chart. A centrist Fed in 2018 may be more balanced in normalizing rates and its balance sheet, while a dovish Fed in 2019 and 2020 may lean towards hiking rates less and trimming its balance sheet less to continue to be more stimulative.

Print PDF

Subscribe to Research Email Alerts

Research Email Alert Subscription

Thank You

We appreciate your interest in Marquette Associates.