Topic Tags: U.S. Equity

Will Strong Deal Activity Continue in 2018?

M&A activity got off to a fast start in 2018, as over 7,000 deals worth $1.3 trillion in value were announced during the first quarter. A common theme among these deals were complex cross-border transactions. The number of transactions greater than $10 billion doubled to a Q1 record of eighteen versus eight last year.

Health care and media/content related deals dominated the quarter and are expected to continue throughout the year. The largest announced deal was the $55 billion merger between Cigna and Express Scripts, a vertical merger of healthcare providers. Other announced deals in the quarter included Comcast’s $31 billion bid for British broadcaster Sky; Keurig Green Mountain’s $19 billion acquisition of Dr Pepper Snapple Group and French insurer AXA’s $15 billion takeover of XL Group.

The biggest risk to M&A deals going forward? Government intervention remains the elephant in the room. Markets became alarmed following the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) antitrust suit in 4Q 2017 around the Time Warner/AT&T deal. The trial between the companies and the DOJ started on March 19th and is expected to continue over the next few months, with many in the media space following it very closely. Government intervention continued in 2018 as the Trump administration blocked Broadcom’s $117 billion hostile bid for Qualcomm, citing national security concerns. Companies now must spend time analyzing how the U.S. government will view any potential deal. Deal activity will likely remain strong in 2018 if companies feel the U.S. government will remain on the sidelines.

As it relates to investments, the fast start of M&A activity in 2018 has given merger arbitrage hedge funds a diverse set of transactions to invest in. A typical merger arbitrage hedge fund will buy shares of the target company and short the acquiring company by borrowing shares with the hope of repaying them later with lower cost shares. If the deal goes as planned, the target company’s stock price should eventually rise to the agreed per-share transaction price and the acquirer’s price should fall to reflect what it is paying for the deal. Deal spreads widened out in February as equity market volatility returned and concerns about government intervention continued to grow. Despite healthy deal activity, merger arbitrage funds have been carefully analyzing deals and how the current administration is likely to view them, thus adding another dynamic to the traditional merger arbitrage strategy.

Print PDF

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

What Do Higher Interest Rates Mean for Higher Yielding Equity Sectors?

It looks like interest rates will dominate both fixed income and equity markets in 2018. Potentially higher interest rates have not only negatively affected bond markets, but have also wreaked havoc in certain sectors of the equity markets. Particularly hard hit:

  • Consumer Staples, down 7.1%;
  • Telecom, down 7.0%;
  • Real Estate, down 6.7%, and
  • Utilities, down 4.7 %.

Predictably, these are the worst performing sectors in the S&P 500 through April 13, 2018. The S&P 500 was down 0.1% over the same period.

Given the stubbornly low interest rate environment after the Global Financial Crisis, investment firms created a plethora of high dividend indices and strategies to respond to the world’s demand for yield. Investors who were not comfortable taking a bet on long duration bonds often invested in high dividend yield strategies to capture yield premiums over the 10-year bond and S&P 500. After a few years, high yielding sectors were often among the best performers in the market. For instance, in 2014 the Telecom sector returned 29.0%, trouncing the return of every other sector and the S&P 500 index.

Dividend-oriented ETFs saw $40B in net inflows which was in stark contrast to equities which have seen outflows over the same time period. However, there have been periods of outflows, namely during the Taper Tantrum in the summer of 2013 and in December 2015 after the Fed’s first interest rate hike.

However, the interest rate outlook is very different today versus three years ago. The global economy is strong and the U.S. is embarking on an interest rate normalization process. Since year-end, the yield on the 10-year bond increased 0.4% from 2.4% to 2.8% and the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats index, a proxy for high yielding stocks, yields 2.5%, which is lower than the yield on bonds. As fixed income’s yield prospects have improved, the interest in bond-proxy sectors has waned and investors are starting to withdraw assets. Although outflows are not as extreme as in December 2015, the return prospects of bond-proxy sectors could be challenged further as rates continue to rise.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Is the Worst Over, or Still Yet to Come?

In the last few months investors were quickly reminded of the volatile nature of equities as these markets suffered steep declines. While there are several possible explanations — ranging from high valuations to geopolitical concerns — many are wondering if we were simply due for a correction or if this a sign of more to come. This week’s chart looks at the historical inter-year drawdowns for the S&P 500 to see how the recent pullback compares.

Since 1983, the S&P 500 index has only had five calendar years with a negative return. Despite this, 28 out of the last 35 years had an intra-year drawdown of more than 7% with the median max drawdown around 10%. Year to date, 2018’s largest drawdown was 10.2%. While this is significant, especially in comparison to the remarkably calm 2017, this is not out of the ordinary. Additionally, even with this drop in the index, the total return for the year is nearly flat thanks to dividend yields.

It is difficult to predict what happens next given the current volatility. Many geopolitical risks remain and though valuations have come down, they are still elevated in comparison to historic levels. However, this drawdown is similar in magnitude to many previous years and the historic average, suggesting that the worst may be over. Even with drawdowns of this size most years have delivered positive equity returns, meaning this could an opportunity to enter the market or invest additional funds.

Print PDF

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Can Low Interest Rates Justify High Stock Valuations?

Given the persistence of above-average equity market valuations in recent years, a proclamation oft-heard from the financial press and market pundits alike is that today’s low interest rates justify these higher valuations. Intuitively, it is easy to see how the rationale behind such statements originated. At the most basic level, the intrinsic value of stocks (and most assets) is the present value of their discounted future stream of cash flows, where the required rate of return (“discount rate”) reflects the riskiness of those cash flows. For instance, discount rates for stocks are higher than those for bonds due to the greater uncertainty of cash flows to equity owners. Because of this framework, and noting that lower discount rates will result in higher present-day asset valuations, it can be easy to empathize with the notion that lofty stock prices today, relative to their fundamentals, are “justified.”

To investigate the validity of such claims, this week’s chart examines the historical relationship between interest rates and equity valuations, defined as the cyclically-adjusted P/E (CAPE) ratio. If the theory holds true in practice, we would expect to see periods of heightened equity valuations coincide with low interest rates. As seen above, there are indeed periods where this relationship is observed — including today and in the late 1920’s prior to the Great Depression. However, there are also periods where the opposite is true — such as the 1910’s and during much of the 1940’s — when low interest rates accompanied low valuations. Likewise, long interest rates reached what were then all-time highs in the late 1960’s, but valuations were also heightened, challenging the assertions that are repeated today. Based on what history has shown us, we would caution against the use of long interest rates as a reliable gauge of the reasonableness of equity market valuations.

Print PDF

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Treasuries vs. Dollar Purchasing Power

Our Chart of the Week reviews the link between the 10-year U.S. Treasury Yield and the Trade Weighted U.S. Dollar Index. The Trade Weighted U.S. Dollar Index measures the value of the U.S. dollar relative to a broad group of currencies circulated throughout the globe, lending insight into the global purchasing power of the dollar.

The left axis displays the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury and on the right axis, the price of the Trade Weighted Dollar Index. Higher U.S. interest rates is one factor that can lead to a stronger dollar, as foreign investors look to place their monies into higher yielding U.S. government securities. This relationship holds true from the beginning of 2016 through October of 2017 at which point we see the two diverge. In the 4th quarter of 2017, we saw a pick up in the U.S. 10 Year Treasury yield as Congress passed favorable tax legislation.

An additional factor that helps to explain exchange rate movement is the current account balance which measures the balance of trade through the amount of country exports less imports. We saw dollar weakness as the current account deficit rose to $128.2 billion in the 4th quarter of 2017, the highest level since the end of 2008.

As equity volatility picked up in February 2018, we saw an inflection point in the data. Equity volatility can be measured through the VIX-CBOE Volatility Index, which measures the market’s expectations of 30-day volatility for the S&P 500 Index. The VIX increased from a level of 11 at the end of 2017 to a current level of 22.5; the long-term average is 20.

Historically speaking, the correlation between these two economic variables has been positive, but the two trends have diverged more recently. As economic and political developments occur, including the U.S. Federal Reserve’s normalization of short term interest rates, discussions of potential trade wars and other developments, we will continue to monitor the correlation between the U.S. 10 Year Treasury Yield and the Trade Weighted Index, with the expectation that a positive correlation will re-emerge in the coming year.

Print PDF

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Is This the End of a Low Volatility Regime?

For most of 2017, we were fixated on the unusually low volatility environment. Despite a number of geopolitical challenges, markets continued their sanguine march to higher heights. A month ago, we reviewed the latest U.S. equity market correction (defined as a market decline of at least 10%). At the beginning of the year, the S&P 500 Index had not had a negative month since October 2016 and January 2018 was already off to a strong start. However, cracks started to appear at the end of January as generally positive news (i.e. higher wage growth and low unemployment) precipitated February’s market decline and the first U.S. equity market correction since January 2016.

Periods of higher volatility and market corrections are not unusual at all. In the chart above, we have plotted the CBOE Volatility Index, also known as the VIX. The VIX shows the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility for the S&P 500 Index. Twenty is the average level of the VIX. Since the VIX’s inception, there have been vacillations between periods of high and low volatility, as noted in the chart. Coming off a period of extended low volatility, it is not surprising that current signals suggest elevated volatility in the near future. First, volatility regimes have lasted a little over five years on average; the current period is at the end of its sixth year. Second, the Federal Reserve is embarking on an interest rate normalization process and investors are afraid that the Fed may have to tighten faster due to stronger economic growth and inflation pressures. Excessive Fed tightening could constrain growth and thus equity markets, which explains the market drop in February.

However, higher volatility does not necessarily mean markets will be negative. From December 1996 through January 2003 and from July 2007 through June 2012 — the last two periods of higher volatility — the market posted positive returns. The former period included the bursting of the Tech Bubble and two U.S. recessions while the latter period encompassed the Global Financial Crisis. So while market volatility has risen from extremely low levels over the past six weeks, volatility is part of a functioning and healthy equity market.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Value Underperformance in the Current Market Cycle

With the value premium seemingly in decline, value investors have had a lot to complain about over the past ten years. Growth stocks continue to soar despite rich valuations and increasingly lofty expectations. However, we are most likely closer to the end than the beginning of this “pro-growth” trend.

Download PDF

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice nor an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Are Equities Oversold?

After an extended period of historically low volatility and steady gains in U.S. equity markets, the first significant pullback for U.S. equities since February 2016 has transpired over the last week. Through February 8th, the DJIA and S&P 500 each traded below their January 26th all-time closing highs by 10.4% and 9.7%, respectively. In 2017 the DJIA posted a record 71 new closing highs while the S&P 500 notched 62 new closing highs, its second highest in history. The upward trend continued into January 2018 with both DJIA and S&P continuing to record 11 and 14 additional new closing highs.

With the sharp return of volatility to a bull market that is already long in duration, investors are rightfully feeling a bit jittery right about now. The catalyst for the recent sell-off began with last week’s employment report showing faster than expected wage growth. This created concern that inflation could rise faster than expected. Under this scenario, the Fed would be forced to raise short-term rates at a quicker pace than what is currently being priced into the market. Only time will tell if this was simply a long overdue pullback as part of a normally functioning market, or the start of further price deterioration. While the bull market is long by historical standards and valuations are near the upper end of their historical ranges, economic and corporate fundamentals do not appear to signal warning signs. With such uncertainty, it can be helpful to look towards technical signals for clues.

This week’s chart looks at a popular technical indicator, the Relative Strength Index (RSI). This indicator measures the degree of recent gains and losses for a security or index over a specified period, typically 14 days, to identify overbought or oversold conditions. Its calculation captures both the speed and magnitude of price movements. RSI values range between 0 and 100, however RSI values of 70 or above are generally considered overbought and likely to experience a trend reversal. Likewise, RSI values of 30 or below are generally considered oversold and likely to experience a trend reversal to the upside. RSI values can remain in overbought or oversold territory for extended periods of time, so it is not until that value crosses these threshold levels again that a bottom or top is considered as being potentially formed. At the January 26th close, the DJIA’s RSI measured 88.7 and had been in overbought territory since late 2017. With the recent pullback, the DJIA’s RSI quickly dropped to 29.5 as of February 5th. The following three trading days produced large price swings, but ultimately these indices have continued to trade lower. Currently at 30.4, RSI for the DJIA is thus far holding above the oversold threshold. While a technically oversold level may foreshadow a future potential uptrend, investors should not place too much weight on any one indicator.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

You Get a Dividend, You Get a Dividend, You Get a Dividend!

As January closes, it is not uncommon for New Year’s resolutions to go up in smoke; one publication has suggested that as many as 80% of commitments for change are gone come February.¹ Regardless, many such resolutions target weight loss in the New Year, and an obvious winner in this game would seem to be Weight Watchers. However, January’s performance for this stock appears surprisingly unrelated to news of increased subscribers. Instead, it appears that the influential figurehead Oprah Winfrey had an unanticipated — and unconventional — impact on Weight Watcher’s January performance.

Since Oprah took a 10% stake and joined the board of directors at Weight Watchers in late 2015, her $43 million investment has grown to exceed $400 million. Compare that 847% growth to the S&P’s 39% increase and the Oprah effect cannot be denied. Her powerful speech at the Golden Globes on January 7th incited social media to explode with excitement over a theorized 2020 run for the presidency. Weight Watchers shares jumped over 12% the Monday following her speech and an additional 9% the next day; the stock continued to climb through January, though this was likely due to more typical reasons such as the company’s strong growth outlook. Once news broke on the 25th that Oprah was officially not planning to run for president, shares tumbled 7% intraday and ended the month down 5% from their January peak.

An announcement from a board member regarding a lack of intent to run for president is certainly not a typical cause for a depression in stock price, and this situation is only a recent example of the growing importance of a company’s brand. Stock prices are no longer solely affected by their fundamentals; a seemingly unrelated blip in the news cycle can now blow up on social media and essentially override a company’s true fundamentals to impact its share price. While an event like this can be unpredictable, it forces management across all industries to have a stronger brand awareness, which is ultimately a good thing as it can lead to increased responsiveness to consumer feedback. As it relates to portfolio management, actively managed funds that can successfully account for this trend are more likely to outperform both their peers and respective indices. As capital markets unfold in 2018, this is a pattern that bears watching.

Print PDF

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

2018 Market Preview

Each year, investors face numerous questions that can impact their portfolios, and 2018 is no different. How will tax reform further impact the capital markets? How much – and often – will the Fed raise rates in the coming year? Can international equities continue to outperform their U.S. counterparts?  Should we be concerned about the levels of dry powder in the private equity market? These topics among many others are covered in the following articles as we offer our annual market preview newsletters. In the links below, readers will find a preview newsletter for each asset class that we cover, as well as a general U.S. economic preview. Each article contains insightful analysis and key themes to monitor over the coming year, themes which will underlie the actual performance of the asset classes covered. We hope that this set of articles can assist you and your committees as you plan for 2018. Should you have any questions about any of the content, please feel free to contact myself or any of the authors or consultants here at Marquette. We also have a webinar recording available by request if you would like to hear a high-level presentation of the topics presented in these articles. Happy New Year!

U.S. Economy by Jeffrey Hoffmeyer, CFA, Lead Analyst, Asset Allocation

Fixed Income by Ben Mohr, CFA, Senior Research Analyst, Fixed Income

U.S. Equities by Samantha T. Grant, CFA, CAIA, Senior Research Analyst, U.S. Equities & Rob Britenbach, CIPM, Research Analyst, U.S. Equities

Non-U.S. Equities by David Hernandez, CFA, Senior Research Analyst, International Equities

Real Estate by Jeremy Zirin, CAIA, Senior Research Analyst, Real Assets

Infrastructure by Jeremy Zirin, CAIA, Senior Research Analyst, Real Assets

Hedge Funds by Joe McGuane, Senior Research Analyst, Alternatives

Private Equity by Derek Schmidt, CFA, CAIA, Senior Research Analyst, Private Equity