Global Equities Still Well Above COVID Lows

Just over two years ago, on March 23rd, 2020, global equities hit their COVID-19-induced bottom. At their lows, the S&P 500, MSCI Emerging Markets Index, and MSCI EAFE Index were down 30%, 32%, and 33%, respectively, year-to-date. Over the next seven quarters, global equities produced mostly positive returns, with the S&P 500 leading the way. From the 2020 trough, the large-cap U.S. index was up an astounding 119% through the end of 2021.

This year, markets have faced several geopolitical and macroeconomic concerns that have squashed that positive momentum. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February and China’s rise in COVID-19 cases combined with its zero-COVID policy have worsened supply chain issues, exacerbated global inflation, and added to mounting economic pressures. To combat inflation, central banks have aggressively raised interest rates, which will likely further dampen economic activity. As a result of these headwinds, the S&P 500, MSCI EM, and MSCI EAFE benchmarks are all down roughly 17–19% year-to-date.¹ Despite these losses, global equities remain well above the COVID-19 trough, with non-U.S. equities still roughly 40+% higher and the S&P 500 77% higher. Looking forward, we expect global equities — particularly in developed countries — to face continued volatility in the second half of the year as central banks continue their fight against inflation, likely at the expense of economic growth.

Print PDF > Global Equities Still Well Above COVID Lows

¹As of June 29, 2022

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Can Bond Investors Outsmart the Market?

While it is generally accepted that successfully and consistently timing the equity market is a loser’s bet, the same sentiment is not heard as often in the bond market. However, timing interest rates is just as difficult as equity markets and can lead to the same patterns of underperformance over multiple market cycles. Nonetheless, the recent rate volatility may be a temptation to shorten duration in anticipation of further rate rises. The following analysis examines why this strategy could be difficult to execute successfully, and why we recommend that clients stay the course and remain invested in line with their investment policies.

Read > Can Bond Investors Outsmart the Market?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Private Equity — Living in the 21st Century

In 2011, venture capitalist Marc Andreessen wrote “software is eating the world,” and added that disruptors were “invading and overturning established industry structures.” Private equity firms were taking notes. Over the past decade, technology investments have steadily grown as a percentage of the global buyout market. In 2021, $284 billion in technology deals were closed, accounting for 25% of total buyout deal value and 31% of total buyout deal count — the largest share of any sector. Of that $284 billion, software deals comprised $256 billion. And while capital has flooded the sector, increasing competition for these businesses and driving up multiples, superior performance has continued, both in terms of lower loss rates and higher upside of outperforming deals.

Additionally, the value creation levers being pulled by private equity firms in the technology space appear sustainable. According to DealEdge, in fully realized global buyout deals between 2010 and 2021 with more than $50 million in invested capital, 71% of the value created in technology deals (excluding software) and 55% in software deals was driven by EBITDA growth, relative to 44% for all other sectors. These compelling return characteristics are due in large part to the operating models of these businesses — asset light, scalable, with high margins, and, in most cases, sticky, recurring revenue.

Despite the sector’s broad appeal, technology has proven to be a domain for specialists within the buyout market. The complexity of these business models, constant evolution in the technology landscape, and the need for expertise to lead these businesses at scale lends itself to investors who focus exclusively on the sector. LPs appear to share this sentiment, with more than $270 billion raised by technology-focused private equity firms in the past five years, equivalent to 13% of total global buyout capital raised during that time.

While technology and software stocks in the public arena have suffered over the last year-plus amid rising rates, private companies have not been subject to the same mark-to-market risk. The sector remains a driving force in innovation and economic value creation, and we expect exciting opportunities for private equity firms to persist.

Print PDF > Private Equity – Living in the 21st Century

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

When Apple Becomes the Forbidden Fruit

For much of the last two years, big name tech stocks had been tantalizing fruit for investors willing to pay up for growth. Enter 2022. After peaking on January 4th, the S&P 500 has taken a nosedive, led by those same tech stocks. Since 2018, the Information Technology sector has grown from a 20.1% weight in the S&P 500 to 26.8%, setting it up to now have an outsized impact as equities correct. The largest detractors year-to-date, regardless of GICS sector classification, have business models and value propositions rooted in technological advancement and innovation. The top eight detractors this year are Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Tesla, NVIDIA, and Netflix. These eight stocks have cost the index more than 800 basis points year-to-date, almost half of the S&P 500’s -17.6% return.¹

Behind the outsized correction in technology stocks are macro headwinds and rising rates. The instability caused by the Russia/Ukraine war, COVID-related shutdowns in China, ongoing supply chain disruptions, and heightened inflation has led to shifts out of longer-duration growth stocks towards the perceived safety of assets like gold and value stocks. Rising rates are weighing on growth stock multiples and increasing recessionary concerns are reducing confidence in outyear earnings projections. Uncertainty is high and sentiment is weak, and while risks certainly remain, that may eventually help support a market bottom. Up or down, large tech stocks will continue to have a meaningful impact on broader market returns.

Print PDF > When Apple Becomes the Forbidden Fruit

¹As of June 10, 2022

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Defined Contribution Plan Legislative Update – 2Q 2022

This legislative update covers the SECURE Act 2.0, summarizes requirements in the SECURE Act for defined contribution plans to provide participants with lifetime income illustrations, addresses the Department of Labor’s recent guidance regarding cryptocurrencies in retirement plans, and reviews plan features and enhancements employers are considering to improve employee retention amidst the “Great Resignation.”

Read > 2Q 2022 DC Legislative Update

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

High on Lithium

Electric vehicle (EV) sales have seen significant growth over the past several years. Recently, elevated demand has contributed to a rampant increase in lithium prices, a primary input to the batteries that power EVs. As the global transition to a clean energy economy continues, the demand for lithium is expected to rise exponentially, to the point of creating a supply shortage in the coming years. While the metal itself is not in short supply, there are limitations to the extraction process and investment in the space has yet to catch up with the rise in demand.

In the last two years, lithium prices have soared more than 700% as sales of EVs have hit record-breaking numbers. Demand for lithium, according to McKinsey & Co., is expected to increase more than sixfold to 3.3 million metric tons in 2030 from 0.54 million metric tons in 2021. Supply is currently projected to reach 2.7 million metric tons by 2030, leaving 0.64 million in demand unaccounted for. The lithium mining industry today resembles an oligopoly, with only a handful of companies responsible for the majority of global supply. Going forward, this could change as further investment is made into the space, which could in turn help normalize price levels. While mining is often thought of as the polar opposite of sustainability, lithium mining actually helps further green energy initiatives, and lithium-related investments may serve ESG-focused investors well over time.

Print PDF > High on Lithium

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Consumer Sentiment: Harbinger for Recession or a Reflection of Pain at the Pump?

U.S. consumer sentiment has become increasingly pessimistic in 2022 as a plethora of macro headwinds have created uncertainty. The University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index, a key proxy for consumer confidence, fell to 58.4 in May, the lowest reading since August 2011. The survey aggregates consumer views across a range of questions including personal finances, general business conditions, housing market conditions, spending expectations, and outlook. The overall level of the index and the relative change from prior readings provide an indication as to how consumers feel about the current and future U.S. economy. Since its inception in 1978, the survey has posted a reading below 60 in only three other distinct periods: the late stages of the stagflationary environment in 1980, the Global Financial Crisis in 2008–2009, and a brief period in 2011 when S&P Global Ratings downgraded U.S. Treasury debt.

Despite consumer spending comprising the majority of GDP, extremely bearish consumer sentiment has historically been a poor predictor of recession. Survey readings below 60 have coincided with a recession only 33% of the time (two out of six recessions) since 1978. Consumer sentiment surveys seem to be far more indicative of the current consumer experience than the longer-term economic outlook. As seen in this week’s chart, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index has shown a strong correlation to gasoline prices — a very visible component of inflation for most consumers — especially during periods of rising gas prices. While current sentiment can have a very real impact on economic growth via consumer spending, it is important to consider this metric alongside other economic measures, many of which still show consumer strength. With the market laser-focused on the health of the U.S. consumer and the risk of recession, we will continue to monitor various economic indicators and advise our clients accordingly.

Print PDF > Consumer Sentiment: Harbinger for Recession or a Reflection of Pain at the Pump?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Our Growing Stake in the Stock Market

Equity markets have experienced heightened levels of volatility throughout 2022 with the S&P 500 down nearly 20% from its high in January. A host of macroeconomic factors — 40-year high inflation, supply chain disruptions, the war in Ukraine, and hawkish central bank policy — are stoking uncertainty in the markets and driving stocks lower. With the consumer at the center of the biggest unknown — whether the U.S. will dip into recession — the growing connection between individuals and the equity market is an increasingly important dynamic.

It’s generally accepted that the stock market is not the economy, though today the lines are more blurred. The portion of household financial assets held in equities has been steadily increasing, reaching an all-time high of 41.2% at the end of 2021. Individuals have an increasing stake in equity performance, with fluctuations in the stock market directly impacting consumer balance sheets and spending potential, and thus economic growth. This dynamic further complicates the job of the Federal Reserve as it looks to raise rates enough to combat heightened inflation without extinguishing growth. While no one has a crystal ball, continued market volatility seems likely. That said, for long-term investors, history has shown that markets are resilient and staying invested leads to the best outcomes; we encourage investors to remain disciplined.

Print PDF > Our Growing Stake in the Stock Market

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Flirting With a Bear Market: How Did We Get Here, and What Comes Next?

Quite simply, this has been the worst start to a year since the 1930s:

  • One of only 19 quarters since 1976 when both bonds and stocks posted negative returns;
  • One of only six of those quarters when bonds have underperformed stocks;
  • The worst four-month return for the S&P 500 since 1939.

2022 to date has featured a myriad of macroeconomic factors coming to a head: inflation at its highest level since the 1980s, the Federal Reserve responding with aggressive rate hikes, and increasing concerns about the health of the consumer leading to a possible recession. An evolving pandemic, a war in Eastern Europe, and draconian lockdown policies in the world’s second-largest economy and largest manufacturing hub have further added to the problem and complicated the solution. With these macro headwinds and uncertainties driving markets year-to-date, Marquette’s fixed income, U.S. equities, and non-U.S. equities teams discuss the impacts on their asset classes and weigh in on the outlook from here.

Read > Flirting With a Bear Market: How Did We Get Here and What Comes Next?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Observations on Fidelity’s Bitcoin–401(k) Announcement

On April 26th, 2022, Fidelity Investments announced plans to offer bitcoin for 401(k) plans. For Fidelity, this plan is a natural next step. As shown in Exhibit 1, Fidelity began exploring digital assets in 2014. Soon after, bitcoin-centric custody solutions began to emerge, followed by a private fund and spot-based ETF. While Fidelity’s embrace of bitcoin could be seen simply as bandwagon hopping, the trend below suggests that bitcoin may be part of a broader long-term digital asset strategy.

In this edition of DC Perspectives, we cover the implications of Fidelity’s announcement for bitcoin and digital assets broadly, for the investment industry, and for defined contribution plan sponsors.

Read > Observations on Fidelity’s Bitcoin-401(k) Announcement

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.