This week’s chart looks at the CBO’s updated fiscal projections for the U.S. federal government published on May 14th (the red line on this chart is the updated deficit/GDP estimate). These projections are an update from the last set of projections made in February (gray line) and include the full effect of the tax increases implemented on January 1, 2013 and the budget cuts mandated by sequestration, which began on March 1st. These updated projections show a $642 billion drop in the expected federal budget deficit in 2013, and over a $6 trillion reduction in the expected deficit over the next decade. The bars on this chart show the projected improvement in the deficit (higher revenue or lower expenditures) compared to the previous projections. Interestingly, a large part of the improvement in 2013 is driven by payments to the U.S. Treasury from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which have recently returned to profitability after being taken over by the federal government during the credit crisis. While the deficit-to-GDP ratio is now expected to shrink substantially over the next few years, the CBO projections still show the U.S. federal government running a structural deficit of 3%-4% of GDP indefinitely. This is because the recent improvement in the deficit has been driven by a cyclical recovery in the U.S. economy and fiscal austerity, but the long term problem of entitlements remains unsolved. These updated projections are clearly good news for the economy and the market in the near term, but until the long term structural deficits are addressed, investors are unlikely to view the U.S. as back to full fiscal health.

This week’s Chart of the Week focuses on debt levels of the U.S. consumer and federal government. For consumer debt, all forms of debt other than mortgages are included in the analysis. As of the fourth quarter of 2012, U.S. consumers collectively held debt of $2.8T. Over the 32 year time frame since 1981 (when data was first collected), consumer debt has increased from $378B to $2.8T, a whopping increase of 635%. However, this still constitutes a relatively small percentage of U.S. debt, and has hovered between 5 and 10% over the years.

On the other hand, federal debt has not only been a much higher dollar amount (not surprising), but has also been a much more volatile component of overall U.S. debt. As of the fourth quarter of 2012, the Federal Government’s debt was $11.6T. In the 32 year time frame, Federal debt has increased from $821B to $11.6T, an even larger jump of 1313%. Federal debt has averaged 22% of total U.S. debt ranging from a low of 16% to a high of 29%.

The chart above depicts these four debt data points: households’ consumer credit dollar amount, Federal government’s dollar amount, consumer debt percentage of total U.S. debt, and Federal debt percentage of total U.S. debt. The takeaways are quite evident. The Federal debt has increased significantly since the 3rd quarter of 2008 (onset of the Global Financial Crisis), and appears to be maintaining this trajectory. On the other hand, while consumers’ household debt has increased in absolute terms, there have not been dramatic spikes in the debt level. Additionally, it has maintained its weight in the overall debt picture. Given the disparity in both dollar amount and share of overall debt, the level (and trend) of federal debt will continue to have a much more notable impact on the economy and financial markets than consumer debt.

This week’s chart looks at current U.S. Syndicated Loan Underwriting Volume in comparison with the new business environment created by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”). Dodd Frank was enacted by President Obama in 2009 – 2010 with stated objectives of increasing financial accountability and transparency, ending “too big to fail” institutions requiring corporate bailouts, and protecting consumers. However, the ability of the Act’s provisions to accomplish these goals has been the subject of fierce debate. Amidst many new regulations imposed on the Financial Services Industry, Dodd-Frank restricts the types of proprietary trading activities that financial institutions are allowed to practice. This restriction comprises part of what is known as “The Volcker Rule”, which was implemented on July 21, 2012.

One of the major criticisms of the Volcker Rule has been one voiced by Canadian, British, and Japanese government finance ministers and bankers. These countries say the Volcker Rule is a disincentive for their banks to transact with their American counterparts because the Volcker Rule exempts U.S. government securities from its restrictions on proprietary trading but leaves similarly-rated foreign institutions out of the exclusion. Volcker Rule proprietary trading prohibitions would thus apply even if a transaction were between foreign parties wherein an American bank is involved only in an ancillary (ex. clearinghouse) capacity. Under this theory, in order to avoid this interference, foreign banks may avoid syndicating with U.S. banks.

Given that as of 1Q2013, North American deals constitute 82.1% of all Global Syndicated Loans¹, the number of domestically-originated syndicated loans which receive financing should be significantly affected if these doomsayers’ warnings ring true. However, per this week’s chart, over three quarters have passed since the Volcker Rule has become effective, and U.S. Syndicated Loan Underwriting Volume has recovered to pre-subprime crisis levels. Thus, while Dodd Frank and Volcker will continue to be scrutinized along other lines, it would seem that the hypothesized downward pressure on syndicated deals has been much to do about nothing.

¹Bloomberg