Topic Tags: Currency

Livestream Videos: 2022 Investment Symposium

The presentations by our research team from Marquette’s 2022 Investment Symposium livestream on September 23rd are now available. Please feel free to reach out to any of the presenters should you have any questions.

View each talk in the player above — use the upper-right list icon to access a specific presentation.

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. Past performance is not indicative of future results. For full disclosure information, please refer to the end of each presentation. Marquette is an independent investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Marquette including our investment strategies, fees and objectives can be found in our ADV Part 2, which is available upon request.

The Currency Conundrum

The U.S. dollar is the strongest it has been in a generation. The U.S. dollar index is up almost 11% this year against a basket of global reserve currencies with the greenback reaching parity with the euro last week for the first time since 2002. Like many things in financial markets, interest rates tend to be one of the most significant drivers of currency valuation, specifically the interest rate differentials between global central banks. As the Federal Reserve has pivoted to a more hawkish stance to tame decades-high inflation, other central banks, including the ECB and BOJ, have been slower to respond. When capital can flow freely, investors tend to flock to higher-yielding assets as interest rates rise, which leads to appreciation of the higher-interest rate country’s financial account and increases demand for the domestic currency — in this case, the U.S. dollar.

The Japanese yen is down roughly 16% year-to-date and is the worst performing major currency relative to the U.S. dollar. In an effort to fight decades-long deflation, the Bank of Japan has committed to holding down short-term interest rates, resulting in significant currency devaluation. Japan is the largest foreign holder of U.S. Treasuries, with $1.3 trillion as of January 2022. As the U.S. dollar strengthens, it becomes more expensive for Japan to continue to purchase on-the-run Treasury issuances, which could put further upward pressure on U.S. rates at the same time the Fed is lifting the benchmark fed funds rate and engaging in quantitative tightening. The question of what will happen when the two largest buyers of U.S. Treasuries — the Federal Reserve and the Bank of Japan — both remove liquidity from the market is another unknown that could add to market volatility in the near term.

Print PDF > The Currency Conundrum

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Halftime Market Outlook: A Mixed Bag

Last week, we hosted our “Halftime” Market Insights Webinar. As the host, my job was to introduce the analyst for each section and then summarize his or her comments before moving to the next speaker. After the fourth section, I found myself using the term “mixed bag” for the third time; it was at that moment that I knew I had my title for this letter!

Of course, “mixed bag” is an overused and unoriginal cliché to describe a perspective that features both positive and negative elements. If we focus solely on the first half of the year, it is hard to find much good news at all between negative economic growth, historically high inflation, and hefty losses in both the equity and bond markets. Even the good news is rooted in how bad things are…after all, how much longer can inflation stay above 9%? Could the equity market REALLY drop another 20% the second half of the year? Alas, our “mixed bag” descriptor admittedly relies on the assumption that conditions should improve at least somewhat for the remainder of the year, though likely not enough to reverse the damage inflicted during the first half. On an absolute and relative basis, growth and return figures should be better, but it is naïve to think that all of the bad news is behind us.

In this edition:

  • Inflation expectations
  • Consumer and business sentiment
  • The S&P 500’s worst six-month start to a year since 1970
  • Recession probability
  • The Agg’s worst start to a year ever
  • Bonds go back to being bonds

Read > Halftime Market Outlook: A Mixed Bag

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

2022 Halftime Market Insights Video

This video is a recording of a live webinar held July 20th by Marquette’s research team, featuring in-depth analysis of the first half of 2022 and risks and opportunities to monitor in the coming months.

Our Market Insights series examines the primary asset classes we cover for clients including the U.S. economy, fixed income, U.S. and non-U.S. equities, hedge funds, real estate, infrastructure, private equity, and private credit, with presentations by our research analysts and directors.

Sign up for research alerts to be notified when we publish new videos and invited to future webinars.
For more information, questions, or feedback, please send us an email.

Flirting With a Bear Market: How Did We Get Here, and What Comes Next?

Quite simply, this has been the worst start to a year since the 1930s:

  • One of only 19 quarters since 1976 when both bonds and stocks posted negative returns;
  • One of only six of those quarters when bonds have underperformed stocks;
  • The worst four-month return for the S&P 500 since 1939.

2022 to date has featured a myriad of macroeconomic factors coming to a head: inflation at its highest level since the 1980s, the Federal Reserve responding with aggressive rate hikes, and increasing concerns about the health of the consumer leading to a possible recession. An evolving pandemic, a war in Eastern Europe, and draconian lockdown policies in the world’s second-largest economy and largest manufacturing hub have further added to the problem and complicated the solution. With these macro headwinds and uncertainties driving markets year-to-date, Marquette’s fixed income, U.S. equities, and non-U.S. equities teams discuss the impacts on their asset classes and weigh in on the outlook from here.

Read > Flirting With a Bear Market: How Did We Get Here and What Comes Next?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Digital Assets as an Inflation Hedge?

With inflation a top concern for investors, digital assets and cryptocurrencies have reemerged in several narratives as a potential inflation hedge. Crypto proponents have long purported bitcoin as deflationary, citing the crypto’s finite supply and diminishing mining rewards. This week’s chart looks at daily market values of the S&P 500, CPI, bitcoin, and the Cryptocurrencies Index 30 (CCi30), supplemented with correlations. The CCi30 is an index of the top 30 free-floating digital assets by market capitalization, designed to objectively measure the performance of blockchain-based assets, excluding pegged assets known as stablecoins.

Typically, an inflation hedge should correlate and increase in value as inflation increases. The data suggest digital asset performance relative to inflation is intermittent with negligible correlations ranging between -0.02 and 0.03 over the trailing 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year periods. Although there have been several periods – April 2020 and May 2021 – where digital assets moved in step with inflation, there are just as many divergent periods – May 2017 or January 2022. With U.S. adoption of crypto prior to 2020 largely driven by retail investors and opportunistic hedge funds, it is possible that the observed crypto-inflation correlations were the result of short-term momentum and investor sentiment. Looking ahead, advances in institutional adoption could change the crypto-inflation dynamic, with implications for market behavior, volatility, and portfolio application. At this point, however, there is little evidence that cryptocurrencies offer a hedge against inflation, but given the limited data available, this is worth monitoring over the coming years.

Print PDF > Digital Assets as an Inflation Hedge

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

In Context Conversation: The Evolution of Cryptocurrency

This video is a recording of a live webinar by Director of Research Greg Leonberger, FSA, EA, MAAA, and Research Associate Nic Solecki covering cryptocurrency and other digital assets. While not an endorsement of cryptocurrency, Greg and Nic approach the topic from several angles, beginning by addressing common misconceptions, how blockchains work and why they require cryptocurrency, the evolution of digital assets as a potential asset class, sectors and subsectors within digital assets, and technology and concepts that have arisen alongside cryptocurrency, including smart contracts and decentralized finance (DeFi). They then examine adoption across the globe — from consumer to commercial to institutional investors — and provide an overview of performance and investment characteristics for digital assets, including risk/return profiles, liquidity, volatility, performance during drawdowns, and correlations to traditional asset classes. Finally, they address the market risks and most important considerations for investors. The webinar finished with a Q&A, which we have also included in this recording.

Marquette’s In Context series brings our latest research to your screen, with discussion led by the authors behind Marquette’s publications. From current events and trends to portfolio strategy and the broader economic landscape, we explore the questions investors are asking with consideration and the context you need to know.

Sign up for research alerts to be notified when we publish new videos here.
For more information, questions, or feedback, please send us an email.

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. Marquette is an independent investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Marquette including our investment strategies, fees, and objectives can be found in our ADV Part 2, which is available upon request.

What Do the Internet and Cryptocurrencies Have in Common?

Discussions surrounding cryptocurrencies and digital assets have become more common in recent months as investors seek opportunities for future growth amidst high headline inflation and mounting recession concerns. While the narratives regarding digital assets vary widely, one of the more intriguing dialogues to emerge is the broad adoption comparison between the internet and crypto.

Illustrated in green on the left is global internet adoption in its first 10 years; measured as the total number of internet users, global internet users as a percent of world population, and U.S. internet users as a percent of the U.S. population. Similarly, illustrated in blue on the right is global crypto adoption in its first 10 years; measured as total crypto owners, global crypto owners as a percent of world population, and an estimate of U.S. crypto owners as a percent of the U.S. population. At first glance, the commonality between the trends is hard to miss. However, there are some notable nuances.

First, as the U.S. led the digital revolution through the 1990s and into the 2000s, internet users and users as % of the U.S. population grew in tandem. Certainly, U.S. crypto adoption is increasing. However, the fluctuations in U.S. crypto adoption — notably from 2016 through 2020 — seems to imply that U.S. adoption has been less influential in crypto than it was with the internet. Global adoption appears to be a more consistent and prominent growth driver for crypto.

Second, the scale of internet adoption in its first decade was almost ten times greater than that realized by crypto. Although there are numerous explanations for this difference that extend beyond the scope of this causal analysis, the difference itself indicates that crypto has not realized the same breadth of adoption in its first decade as that experienced by the internet.

Naturally, no internet-crypto comparison would be complete without referencing the Dot-Com Bubble and the volatility in crypto markets. The third and final observation is the pattern of both internet and crypto adoption during market drawdowns. Despite the Dot-Com Bubble bursting in 2000, global internet adoption appears to have proceeded unphased. Similarly, when the crypto ICO (initial coin offering) bubble burst in 2018, global adoption seems to have steadily increased. In the context of adoption, this may suggest that both the excesses in secondary markets creating a bubble and the ramifications of a bubble bursting may be overplayed or overstated.

Much remains to be seen and there are many variables at play beyond the scope of this comparison. While the first 10 years of crypto adoption appears more modest than that of the internet, it can be said that crypto has steadily advanced on a trajectory comparable to the internet. History may not repeat itself, but it could rhyme. Past performance does not guarantee future results, but nonetheless, we are fascinated to watch this dynamic play out in the coming years.

Print PDF > What Do the Internet and Cryptocurrencies Have in Common?

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Collapse of the Russian Ruble

This week, as the crisis in Ukraine continues to evolve, we look at the devaluation of the Russian ruble amid retaliation from the West. In response to Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, allied governments are imposing financial sanctions, companies are pulling back from operations in Russia, and investors are looking to exit Russian investments. As a result, the ruble, now worth less than a penny, has fallen more than 30% over the last week. The pace of the move surpasses even that seen in 2014 when Russia moved to a floating exchange rate amid pressures following its annexation of Crimea, resultant sanctions, and the sharp drop in global oil prices. In 2014, Russia was able to leverage its mountain of foreign currency reserves to eventually help stabilize the ruble. That ability is severely restricted this time following the decision to cut off certain Russian banks from SWIFT, the financial messaging system used by more than 200 countries to link money transfers between the world’s banks.

The sharp devaluation of the ruble could shock Russia’s economy. Inflation in Russia surpassed 9% as of February 25th, above the country’s 4% target. The Russian central bank on February 28th more than doubled its benchmark interest rate to 20% in an attempt to prevent a run on banks. The line the world is walking to manage inflation without negatively impacting growth is now much finer in Russia, with reverberations likely to be felt globally. Inflation, the path of rising interest rates, and geopolitical tensions remain key risk factors for investors this year, and we will continue to keep clients updated on developments and any related portfolio recommendations.

Print PDF > Collapse of the Russian Ruble

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.

Life During Wartime: Assessing the Market Impact of the Russia/Ukraine Conflict

Recent days have seen an escalation of political tensions in Eastern Europe, and on February 24th, Russian forces began conducting large-scale military operations in Ukraine. These actions have drawn widespread condemnation from the international community, with NATO repositioning troops along its eastern flank and both the United States and European Union announcing intentions to impose sanctions on a variety of Russian financial institutions. The conflict has also threatened the stability of global markets, particularly those areas of the world economy that are most sensitive to energy and the performance of emerging market countries. The aim of this newsletter is to assess the ramifications of Russian actions vis-à-vis the broad market and determine the potential implications of further escalation of the conflict going forward, including:

  • Equity index performance
  • Index exposure to Russia and Ukraine
  • Commodity market expectations
  • Central bank policy and inflation impacts
  • Historical impact of similar exogenous shocks on equities

Read > Life During Wartime: Assessing the Market Impact of the Russia/Ukraine Conflict

 

The opinions expressed herein are those of Marquette Associates, Inc. (“Marquette”), and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Marquette reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.